Automatic segmentation of MRI images for brain radiotherapy planning using deep ensemble learning.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1088/2057-1976/ada6ba
S A Yoganathan, Tarraf Torfeh, Satheesh Paloor, Rabih Hammoud, Noora Al-Hammadi, Rui Zhang
{"title":"Automatic segmentation of MRI images for brain radiotherapy planning using deep ensemble learning.","authors":"S A Yoganathan, Tarraf Torfeh, Satheesh Paloor, Rabih Hammoud, Noora Al-Hammadi, Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/ada6ba","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i><i>and Purpose</i><b>:</b>This study aimed to develop and evaluate an efficient method to automatically segment T1- and T2-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. We specifically compared the segmentation performance of individual convolutional neural network (CNN) models against an ensemble approach to advance the accuracy of MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT) planning.<i>Materials and Methods</i>. The evaluation was conducted on a private clinical dataset and a publicly available dataset (HaN-Seg). Anonymized MRI data from 55 brain cancer patients, including T1-weighted, T1-weighted with contrast, and T2-weighted images, were used in the clinical dataset. We employed an EDL strategy that integrated five independently trained 2D neural networks, each tailored for precise segmentation of tumors and organs at risk (OARs) in the MRI scans. Class probabilities were obtained by averaging the final layer activations (Softmax outputs) from the five networks using a weighted-average method, which were then converted into discrete labels. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance at 95% (HD95). The EDL model was also tested on the HaN-Seg public dataset for comparison.<i>Results</i>. The EDL model demonstrated superior segmentation performance on both the clinical and public datasets. For the clinical dataset, the ensemble approach achieved an average DSC of 0.7 ± 0.2 and HD95 of 4.5 ± 2.5 mm across all segmentations, significantly outperforming individual networks which yielded DSC values ≤0.6 and HD95 values ≥14 mm. Similar improvements were observed in the HaN-Seg public dataset.<i>Conclusions</i>. Our study shows that the EDL model consistently outperforms individual CNN networks in both clinical and public datasets, demonstrating the potential of ensemble learning to enhance segmentation accuracy. These findings underscore the value of the EDL approach for clinical applications, particularly in MRI-guided RT planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ada6ba","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgroundand Purpose:This study aimed to develop and evaluate an efficient method to automatically segment T1- and T2-weighted brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. We specifically compared the segmentation performance of individual convolutional neural network (CNN) models against an ensemble approach to advance the accuracy of MRI-guided radiotherapy (RT) planning.Materials and Methods. The evaluation was conducted on a private clinical dataset and a publicly available dataset (HaN-Seg). Anonymized MRI data from 55 brain cancer patients, including T1-weighted, T1-weighted with contrast, and T2-weighted images, were used in the clinical dataset. We employed an EDL strategy that integrated five independently trained 2D neural networks, each tailored for precise segmentation of tumors and organs at risk (OARs) in the MRI scans. Class probabilities were obtained by averaging the final layer activations (Softmax outputs) from the five networks using a weighted-average method, which were then converted into discrete labels. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance at 95% (HD95). The EDL model was also tested on the HaN-Seg public dataset for comparison.Results. The EDL model demonstrated superior segmentation performance on both the clinical and public datasets. For the clinical dataset, the ensemble approach achieved an average DSC of 0.7 ± 0.2 and HD95 of 4.5 ± 2.5 mm across all segmentations, significantly outperforming individual networks which yielded DSC values ≤0.6 and HD95 values ≥14 mm. Similar improvements were observed in the HaN-Seg public dataset.Conclusions. Our study shows that the EDL model consistently outperforms individual CNN networks in both clinical and public datasets, demonstrating the potential of ensemble learning to enhance segmentation accuracy. These findings underscore the value of the EDL approach for clinical applications, particularly in MRI-guided RT planning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度集成学习的MRI图像自动分割用于脑放疗规划。
背景与目的:本研究旨在开发和评估一种有效的脑磁共振成像(MRI)图像自动分割T1和t2加权的方法。我们特别比较了单个卷积神经网络(CNN)模型与集成方法的分割性能,以提高mri引导放射治疗(RT)计划的准确性。材料与方法。评估是在一个私人临床数据集和一个公开可用的数据集(HaN-Seg)上进行的。临床数据集中使用了55名脑癌患者的匿名MRI数据,包括t1加权、t1加权对比和t2加权图像。我们采用了一种EDL策略,该策略集成了五个独立训练的2D神经网络,每个神经网络都针对MRI扫描中的肿瘤和危险器官(OARs)进行精确分割。通过使用加权平均方法对五个网络的最终层激活(Softmax输出)进行平均,从而获得类概率,然后将其转换为离散标签。使用Dice相似系数(DSC)和95%的Hausdorff距离(HD95)来评估分割性能。EDL模型还在HaN-Seg公共数据集上进行了测试,以进行比较。EDL模型在临床和公共数据集上都表现出优异的分割性能。对于临床数据集,集成方法在所有分割上的平均DSC为0.7±0.2,HD95为4.5±2.5 mm,显著优于产生DSC值≤0.6和HD95值≥14 mm的单个网络。在HaN-Seg公共数据集中也观察到类似的改善。我们的研究表明,EDL模型在临床和公共数据集中始终优于单个CNN网络,证明了集成学习在提高分割精度方面的潜力。这些发现强调了EDL方法在临床应用中的价值,特别是在mri引导下的RT计划中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
期刊最新文献
Biological cell response to electric field: a review of equivalent circuit models and future challenges. A novel hollow-core antiresonant fiber-based biosensor for blood component detection in the THz regime. Simulations of the potential for diffraction enhanced imaging at 8 kev using polycapillary optics. Determining event-related desynchronization onset latency of foot dorsiflexion in people with multiple sclerosis using the cluster depth tests. Automated detection of traumatic bleeding in CT images using 3D U-Net# and multi-organ segmentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1