Tori L McFarlane, James T Symanowski, Declan Walsh, Ye Myint Aung, Aynur Aktas, Michele L Szafranski, Jonathan C Salo, Patrick L Meadors, Kunal C Kadakia
{"title":"Malnutrition risk and overall survival at solid tumour diagnosis.","authors":"Tori L McFarlane, James T Symanowski, Declan Walsh, Ye Myint Aung, Aynur Aktas, Michele L Szafranski, Jonathan C Salo, Patrick L Meadors, Kunal C Kadakia","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-004906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Malnutrition severely impacts tolerance to anticancer therapies, but any relationship with overall survival (OS) at the time of solid tumour diagnosis in outpatients in the USA remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated 3562 patients who completed the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) at diagnosis, identifying the relationship between MST risk, a validated tool evaluating anorexia and weight loss, and OS. MST score of ≥2 of 5 was classified as high malnutrition risk (H-MST). Kaplan-Meier techniques and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse OS in H-MST versus low malnutrition risk (L-MST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the unadjusted models, MST risk was individually associated with OS. Multivariable regression confirmed that MST risk remained independently prognostic for OS after controlling for key confounding variables, HR=1.51 (95% CI: 1.33 to 1.72). The H-MST group had shorter OS (50-month survival rates: 69% L-MST vs 60% H-MST).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MST risk at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for OS. H-MST risk is associated with shorter survival in a broad cohort of solid tumour oncology outpatients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Malnutrition severely impacts tolerance to anticancer therapies, but any relationship with overall survival (OS) at the time of solid tumour diagnosis in outpatients in the USA remains unclear.
Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 3562 patients who completed the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) at diagnosis, identifying the relationship between MST risk, a validated tool evaluating anorexia and weight loss, and OS. MST score of ≥2 of 5 was classified as high malnutrition risk (H-MST). Kaplan-Meier techniques and Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyse OS in H-MST versus low malnutrition risk (L-MST).
Results: In the unadjusted models, MST risk was individually associated with OS. Multivariable regression confirmed that MST risk remained independently prognostic for OS after controlling for key confounding variables, HR=1.51 (95% CI: 1.33 to 1.72). The H-MST group had shorter OS (50-month survival rates: 69% L-MST vs 60% H-MST).
Conclusion: MST risk at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for OS. H-MST risk is associated with shorter survival in a broad cohort of solid tumour oncology outpatients.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.