Community engagement to inform multi-level analyses of the role of neighborhood factors in cancer control behaviors in African Americans.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1118
Cheryl L Knott, Asli McCullers, Nathaniel Woodard, Valerie Aldana, Beverly R Williams, Eddie M Clark, Mario Schootman, Crystal L Park, Xin He, Debarchana Ghosh
{"title":"Community engagement to inform multi-level analyses of the role of neighborhood factors in cancer control behaviors in African Americans.","authors":"Cheryl L Knott, Asli McCullers, Nathaniel Woodard, Valerie Aldana, Beverly R Williams, Eddie M Clark, Mario Schootman, Crystal L Park, Xin He, Debarchana Ghosh","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While community engagement has had a substantial presence in public health research, community input to inform geospatial and health analyses remains underutilized and novel. This manuscript reports on community engagement activities to solicit stakeholder perspectives on the role of neighborhood conditions in health and cancer. We discuss how this community input refined a priori conceptual model to be tested in the larger Families, Friends, and Neighborhoods (FFAN) Study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with 82 stakeholders (e.g., community and faith leaders, educators, healthcare workers) across four states (Maryland, Connecticut, Alabama, Missouri). Participants discussed how where a person lives can impact their health and cancer risk. We subsequently convened a virtual group discussion with 17 randomly selected interviewees. Our study team individually reviewed discussion notes, which were synthesized into a consensus document.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In addition to constructs from the original conceptual model, participants identified neighborhood-level factors not in the original model, including K-12 education quality, local property investment, homelessness, public transportation infrastructure, proximity to healthcare facilities, environmental toxin exposures, access to healthy foods, and cost of living. These factors will be incorporated into the FFAN study analytic models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Though geospatial analyses in health research has not traditionally employed community engagement techniques, this study illustrates the value of informing multi-level analytic models with the lived experiences of those negatively impacted by neighborhood conditions that underlie the risk, prevention, and screening behaviors driving cancer incidence and mortality.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Future social epidemiology research can be enriched through community engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9458,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While community engagement has had a substantial presence in public health research, community input to inform geospatial and health analyses remains underutilized and novel. This manuscript reports on community engagement activities to solicit stakeholder perspectives on the role of neighborhood conditions in health and cancer. We discuss how this community input refined a priori conceptual model to be tested in the larger Families, Friends, and Neighborhoods (FFAN) Study.

Materials and methods: We conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with 82 stakeholders (e.g., community and faith leaders, educators, healthcare workers) across four states (Maryland, Connecticut, Alabama, Missouri). Participants discussed how where a person lives can impact their health and cancer risk. We subsequently convened a virtual group discussion with 17 randomly selected interviewees. Our study team individually reviewed discussion notes, which were synthesized into a consensus document.

Results: In addition to constructs from the original conceptual model, participants identified neighborhood-level factors not in the original model, including K-12 education quality, local property investment, homelessness, public transportation infrastructure, proximity to healthcare facilities, environmental toxin exposures, access to healthy foods, and cost of living. These factors will be incorporated into the FFAN study analytic models.

Conclusions: Though geospatial analyses in health research has not traditionally employed community engagement techniques, this study illustrates the value of informing multi-level analytic models with the lived experiences of those negatively impacted by neighborhood conditions that underlie the risk, prevention, and screening behaviors driving cancer incidence and mortality.

Impact: Future social epidemiology research can be enriched through community engagement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区参与为非裔美国人癌症控制行为中邻里因素作用的多层次分析提供信息。
背景:虽然社区参与在公共卫生研究中占有重要地位,但社区为地理空间和健康分析提供信息的投入仍未得到充分利用,而且是新颖的。这份手稿报告了社区参与活动,以征求利益相关者对社区条件在健康和癌症中的作用的看法。我们讨论了这种社区输入如何改进先验概念模型,以便在更大的家庭、朋友和社区(FFAN)研究中进行测试。材料和方法:我们对四个州(马里兰州、康涅狄格州、阿拉巴马州、密苏里州)的82名利益相关者(例如,社区和信仰领袖、教育工作者、医疗工作者)进行了半结构化的虚拟访谈。与会者讨论了一个人的居住地如何影响他们的健康和癌症风险。随后,我们召集了一个虚拟小组讨论,随机选择了17名受访者。我们的研究小组单独审查了讨论笔记,这些笔记被合成为一个共识文件。结果:除了原始概念模型的构建外,参与者还确定了原始模型中未包含的社区层面因素,包括K-12教育质量、当地房地产投资、无家可归者、公共交通基础设施、靠近医疗设施、环境毒素暴露、获取健康食品和生活成本。这些因素将被纳入FFAN研究分析模型。结论:虽然健康研究中的地理空间分析传统上没有采用社区参与技术,但本研究说明了将受社区条件负面影响的人们的生活经历告知多层次分析模型的价值,这些环境条件是驱动癌症发病率和死亡率的风险、预防和筛查行为的基础。影响:未来的社会流行病学研究可以通过社区参与来丰富。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
538
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention publishes original peer-reviewed, population-based research on cancer etiology, prevention, surveillance, and survivorship. The following topics are of special interest: descriptive, analytical, and molecular epidemiology; biomarkers including assay development, validation, and application; chemoprevention and other types of prevention research in the context of descriptive and observational studies; the role of behavioral factors in cancer etiology and prevention; survivorship studies; risk factors; implementation science and cancer care delivery; and the science of cancer health disparities. Besides welcoming manuscripts that address individual subjects in any of the relevant disciplines, CEBP editors encourage the submission of manuscripts with a transdisciplinary approach.
期刊最新文献
Waist circumference, a body shape index, and molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of four cohort studies. Identifying metabolomic mediators of the physical activity and colorectal cancer relationship. Absolute risk prediction for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma adaptable to regional disease burden across diverse regions. The Changing pathogenesis of liver cancer in Hawaii over three decades. Oropharyngeal cancer incidence and trends in Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1