Effectiveness and tolerability of intravenous fosfomycin in treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli: a prospective cohort study from the FOSFOMIC project.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Clinical Microbiology and Infection Pub Date : 2025-01-18 DOI:10.1016/j.cmi.2025.01.007
Elisa Moreno-Mellado, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Murat Akova, Eva León, Nicolás Merchante, David Vinuesa, Encarnación Moral-Escudero, Svetlana Sadyrbaeva-Dolgova, Salvador López-Cárdenas, Ángela Cano-Yuste, Matteo Rinaldi, María Núñez-Núñez, Maddalena Giannella, Jesús Sojo-Dorado, Ana Cristina Antolí-Royo, Natalia Chacón, Vicente Merino-Bohórquez, Inés Portillo, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño, Fernando Docobo-Pérez, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez
{"title":"Effectiveness and tolerability of intravenous fosfomycin in treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by Escherichia coli: a prospective cohort study from the FOSFOMIC project.","authors":"Elisa Moreno-Mellado, Abdullah Tarik Aslan, Murat Akova, Eva León, Nicolás Merchante, David Vinuesa, Encarnación Moral-Escudero, Svetlana Sadyrbaeva-Dolgova, Salvador López-Cárdenas, Ángela Cano-Yuste, Matteo Rinaldi, María Núñez-Núñez, Maddalena Giannella, Jesús Sojo-Dorado, Ana Cristina Antolí-Royo, Natalia Chacón, Vicente Merino-Bohórquez, Inés Portillo, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño, Fernando Docobo-Pérez, Belén Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.01.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The FOSFOMIC study assessed the clinical and microbiological effectiveness, and safety of intravenous fosfomycin in treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by Escherichia coli, in comparison with other intravenous antimicrobials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, multinational matched cohorts study involving adults with community-acquired cUTIs and receiving targeted therapy with intravenous fosfomycin or other first-line drugs (beta-lactams or fluoroquinolones) was conducted from November 2019 to May 2023 in ten centres from Spain, Italy, and Türkiye. Matching criteria included type of infection acquisition, Charlson and Pitt scores. Endpoints were clinical and microbiological cure, mortality, recurrence, and adverse effects. Analyses used conditional logistic regression and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 155 matched pairs were included. Clinical and microbiological cure rates were 65.2% (101/155; 95% CI, 57.4-72.2) and 63.2% (98/155; 95% CI, 55.4-70.4) with fosfomycin and comparators, respectively (adjusted OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.73; p 0.73). Mortality rates were 1.9% (3/155; 95% CI, 0.7-5.5) and 5.8% (9/155; 95% CI, 3.1-10.7), respectively (p 0.11). Recurrence rates were 14.2% (22/155; 95% CI, 9.6-20.6) in the fosfomycin group vs. 10.3% (16/155; 95% CI, 6.1-16.1) (p 0.39). Severe adverse effects occurred in 1.9% (3/155; 95% CI, 0.7-5.5) of patients treated with fosfomycin vs. 0.6% (1/155; 95% CI, 0.0-3.3) in the control group (p 0.62). Non-severe adverse effects were more frequent with fosfomycin, affecting 23.3% (36/155; 95% CI, 17.0-30.7) compared with 7.7% (12/155; 95% CI, 4.1-13.1) in the control group (adjusted OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.04-14.1; p < 0.001). In DOOR analysis, fosfomycin demonstrated comparable effectiveness in treating pyelonephritis (probability of better DOOR, 54.0%; 95% CI, 48.5-59.6) and in comparison with ceftriaxone (50.3%; 95% CI, 44.7-55.8), without evidence of inferiority in bacteraemic urinary tract infections (DOOR, 47.3%; 95% CI, 41.7-52.8).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Fosfomycin is a viable option for treating cUTIs caused by E. coli, allowing for diversification in the treatment of these high-incidence infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.01.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The FOSFOMIC study assessed the clinical and microbiological effectiveness, and safety of intravenous fosfomycin in treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by Escherichia coli, in comparison with other intravenous antimicrobials.

Methods: A prospective, multinational matched cohorts study involving adults with community-acquired cUTIs and receiving targeted therapy with intravenous fosfomycin or other first-line drugs (beta-lactams or fluoroquinolones) was conducted from November 2019 to May 2023 in ten centres from Spain, Italy, and Türkiye. Matching criteria included type of infection acquisition, Charlson and Pitt scores. Endpoints were clinical and microbiological cure, mortality, recurrence, and adverse effects. Analyses used conditional logistic regression and desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR).

Results: Overall, 155 matched pairs were included. Clinical and microbiological cure rates were 65.2% (101/155; 95% CI, 57.4-72.2) and 63.2% (98/155; 95% CI, 55.4-70.4) with fosfomycin and comparators, respectively (adjusted OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.73; p 0.73). Mortality rates were 1.9% (3/155; 95% CI, 0.7-5.5) and 5.8% (9/155; 95% CI, 3.1-10.7), respectively (p 0.11). Recurrence rates were 14.2% (22/155; 95% CI, 9.6-20.6) in the fosfomycin group vs. 10.3% (16/155; 95% CI, 6.1-16.1) (p 0.39). Severe adverse effects occurred in 1.9% (3/155; 95% CI, 0.7-5.5) of patients treated with fosfomycin vs. 0.6% (1/155; 95% CI, 0.0-3.3) in the control group (p 0.62). Non-severe adverse effects were more frequent with fosfomycin, affecting 23.3% (36/155; 95% CI, 17.0-30.7) compared with 7.7% (12/155; 95% CI, 4.1-13.1) in the control group (adjusted OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.04-14.1; p < 0.001). In DOOR analysis, fosfomycin demonstrated comparable effectiveness in treating pyelonephritis (probability of better DOOR, 54.0%; 95% CI, 48.5-59.6) and in comparison with ceftriaxone (50.3%; 95% CI, 44.7-55.8), without evidence of inferiority in bacteraemic urinary tract infections (DOOR, 47.3%; 95% CI, 41.7-52.8).

Discussion: Fosfomycin is a viable option for treating cUTIs caused by E. coli, allowing for diversification in the treatment of these high-incidence infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“静脉注射磷霉素治疗大肠杆菌引起的复杂尿路感染的有效性和耐受性:来自FOSFO-MIC项目的前瞻性队列研究”。
目的:FOSFO-MIC研究评估静脉注射磷霉素治疗由大肠杆菌引起的复杂性尿路感染(cUTIs)的临床、微生物学有效性和安全性,并与其他静脉注射抗菌药物进行比较。方法:2019年11月至2023年5月,在西班牙、意大利和土耳其的10个中心进行了一项前瞻性、多国匹配队列研究,研究对象是接受静脉注射磷霉素或其他一线药物(β -内酰胺类药物或氟喹诺酮类药物)靶向治疗的社区获得性cUTIs成人。匹配标准包括医疗关系、查尔森和皮特分数。终点是临床和微生物治愈率、死亡率、复发率和不良反应。分析采用条件逻辑回归和DOOR。结果:共纳入155对配对。临床和微生物治愈率为65.2% (101/155;95% CI: 57.4-72.2)至63.2% (98/155;95% CI:55.4-70.4),分别与磷霉素和比较物(aOR: 1.09;95%置信区间:0.68—-1.73;p = 0.73)。死亡率为1.9% (3/155;95% CI:0.7-5.5)和5.8% (9/155;95% CI:3.1-10.7) (p=0.11)。复发率14.2% (22/155;95% CI: 9.6-20.6),而磷霉素组为10.3% (16/155;95% CI: 6.1-16.1) (p=0.39)。严重不良反应发生率为1.9% (3/155;95% CI: 0.7-5.5)与0.6% (1/155;95% CI: 0.0-3.3) (p=0.62)。非严重不良反应在磷霉素组更为常见,发生率为23.3% (36/155;95% CI: 17.0-30.7)与7.7% (12/155;95% CI: 4.1-13.1) (aOR: 5.36;95% ci: 2.04-14.1;结论:磷霉素是治疗由大肠杆菌引起的cUTIs的可行选择,可使这些高发感染的治疗多样化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
期刊最新文献
Mortality due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemia: a five-year cohort study in intensive care patients. Detection of Treponema pallidum DNA for diagnosis, resistance identification, and treatment outcome prediction in early syphilis among men who have sex with men. Metagenomic analysis of microbial cell-free DNA from plasma of patients with suspected infections: performance and therapeutic impact in clinical routine. Re: 'In vitro activity of cefepime-enmetazobactam on carbapenem resistant Gram negatives' by Bonnin et al. Revisiting diagnostics: Syndromic PCR-based testing beyond its approval and what we need instead.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1