Adult Attachment Style, Emotion Regulation and Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder—A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Mediational Investigation of an Attachment-Based Model

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical psychology & psychotherapy Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1002/cpp.70031
Sara Kerstine Kaya Nielsen, Anne Christine Stuart, Clas Winding, Mette Øllgaard Pedersen, Sarah Ingrid Franksdatter Daniel, Signe Vangkilde, Nicole Rosenberg, Ida Hageman, Anders Petersen, Martin Balslev Jørgensen
{"title":"Adult Attachment Style, Emotion Regulation and Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder—A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Mediational Investigation of an Attachment-Based Model","authors":"Sara Kerstine Kaya Nielsen,&nbsp;Anne Christine Stuart,&nbsp;Clas Winding,&nbsp;Mette Øllgaard Pedersen,&nbsp;Sarah Ingrid Franksdatter Daniel,&nbsp;Signe Vangkilde,&nbsp;Nicole Rosenberg,&nbsp;Ida Hageman,&nbsp;Anders Petersen,&nbsp;Martin Balslev Jørgensen","doi":"10.1002/cpp.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>There is evidence that emotion regulation plays a role in the aetiology and maintenance of OCD, but knowledge about what impacts emotion dysregulation is limited. Attachment style is related to both emotion regulation and OCD symptoms, but the link between them has not been thoroughly studied. Examining emotion dysregulation within the context of OCD through an attachment theory framework may lead to a better understanding of the aetiology and maintenance of OCD. In the present study, we combined theoretically and empirically derived knowledge to examine the mediating role of emotion regulation between attachment dimensions (avoidance and anxiety) and OCD symptoms. One-hundred seventy-nine individuals with OCD were assessed with Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Yale-Brown Obsession Compulsion Scale (Y-BOCS), and mediation analyses were conducted. Our results indicate that the association between OCD and attachment anxiety/avoidance was mediated by emotion dysregulation. The primary limitation of our study is that data are cross-sectional and, therefore, we cannot infer anything about the causal direction of these relationships. A second limitation of the study is that two of the three measures were derived from self-reported questionnaires, which may be prone to biassed reporting. Our results suggest that insecure attachment is important in OCD when taking emotion regulation into account. Thus, clinical interventions for OCD may improve by targeting attachment and difficulties related to emotion regulation. However, our findings are based on cross-sectional data that preclude conclusions relating to causal influence.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.70031","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is evidence that emotion regulation plays a role in the aetiology and maintenance of OCD, but knowledge about what impacts emotion dysregulation is limited. Attachment style is related to both emotion regulation and OCD symptoms, but the link between them has not been thoroughly studied. Examining emotion dysregulation within the context of OCD through an attachment theory framework may lead to a better understanding of the aetiology and maintenance of OCD. In the present study, we combined theoretically and empirically derived knowledge to examine the mediating role of emotion regulation between attachment dimensions (avoidance and anxiety) and OCD symptoms. One-hundred seventy-nine individuals with OCD were assessed with Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) and Yale-Brown Obsession Compulsion Scale (Y-BOCS), and mediation analyses were conducted. Our results indicate that the association between OCD and attachment anxiety/avoidance was mediated by emotion dysregulation. The primary limitation of our study is that data are cross-sectional and, therefore, we cannot infer anything about the causal direction of these relationships. A second limitation of the study is that two of the three measures were derived from self-reported questionnaires, which may be prone to biassed reporting. Our results suggest that insecure attachment is important in OCD when taking emotion regulation into account. Thus, clinical interventions for OCD may improve by targeting attachment and difficulties related to emotion regulation. However, our findings are based on cross-sectional data that preclude conclusions relating to causal influence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人依恋类型、情绪调节与强迫症——依恋模型的初步横断面中介研究。
有证据表明,情绪调节在强迫症的病因和维持中起着重要作用,但对影响情绪失调的因素的了解有限。依恋类型与情绪调节和强迫症症状都有关系,但两者之间的联系尚未得到深入研究。通过依恋理论框架来研究强迫症背景下的情绪失调可能有助于更好地理解强迫症的病因和维持。在本研究中,我们结合理论和实证知识来检验情感调节在依恋维度(回避和焦虑)与强迫症症状之间的中介作用。采用亲密关系体验修正量表(ECR-R)、情绪调节困难量表(DERS)和耶鲁-布朗强迫强迫量表(Y-BOCS)对179名强迫症患者进行了评估,并进行了中介分析。研究结果表明,强迫症与依恋焦虑/回避之间的关系是由情绪失调介导的。我们研究的主要限制是数据是横断面的,因此,我们无法推断这些关系的因果方向。该研究的第二个局限性是,三个测量中有两个来自自我报告的问卷,这可能容易导致有偏见的报告。我们的研究结果表明,当考虑到情绪调节时,不安全依恋在强迫症中很重要。因此,对强迫症的临床干预可以通过针对依恋和情绪调节相关的困难来改善。然而,我们的发现是基于横断面数据,排除了因果影响的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
期刊最新文献
Five-Year Outcomes of a Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Skills Training Group Versus Supportive Group Training for Individuals With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Randomized Controlled Study Schema Mechanisms Underlying Emotion Dysregulation and Impulsivity in Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Borderline Personality Disorder Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors for Intermittent Explosive Disorder, ADHD and Conduct Disorder: Shared and Unique Influences Dissociative Symptoms Associated With Phenotypical Characteristics in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review Interrelationships Among Childhood Trauma, Insecure Attachment, Dissociation, Negative Schemas and Psychosis Symptoms: A Network Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1