The Estimation Value of 99mTc-MAA in Comparison with 90Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current radiopharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859
Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir
{"title":"The Estimation Value of 99mTc-MAA in Comparison with 90Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies.","authors":"Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir","doi":"10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by 90Y-glass microspheres.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after 99mTc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over 90Y-PET/MR images after 90Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit90Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor dose was 270±111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ±12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55±18 Gy from 99mTc-MAA simulation. 90YPET/ MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271±125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25±12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was deduced that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in 90Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with 90Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the 99mTc-MAA simulation was not affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":10991,"journal":{"name":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by 90Y-glass microspheres.

Material and methods: Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after 99mTc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over 90Y-PET/MR images after 90Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit90Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean tumor dose was 270±111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ±12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55±18 Gy from 99mTc-MAA simulation. 90YPET/ MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271±125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25±12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.

Conclusion: It was deduced that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in 90Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with 90Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the 99mTc-MAA simulation was not affected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
99mTc-MAA与90Y-PET/ mr剂量法在肝脏恶性肿瘤选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)中的价值比较
目的:本研究旨在比较90y玻璃微球治疗肝脏肿瘤时,99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT和90Y-PET/MR扫描对靶区和非靶区辐射剂量的估计。材料和方法:对23例符合条件的患者(13M, 10F)进行SPECT/CT 99mTc-MAA模拟后的剂量估计,并对90y微球治疗后超过90y的pet /MR图像进行剂量估计。使用Simplicit90Y™软件对肝实质进行基于体素的剂量测定。获得了整个健康肝脏(HL)、健康注射肝脏(HIL)和肿瘤体积的剂量估计。采用Pearson相关、Bland-Altman图和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析。结果:99mTc-MAA模拟的肿瘤平均剂量为270±111 Gy,全肝实质剂量为26±12 Gy,健康肝脏注射剂量为55±18 Gy。90YPET/ MR剂量测定显示肿瘤平均剂量为271±125 Gy, HIL平均剂量为54±18 Gy,肝实质剂量为25±12 Gy。肿瘤剂量(R2=0.90)和肝脏剂量(R2=0.87)之间的一致性很好,而HIL剂量的一致性较低(R2=0.80)。Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示所有肝室的剂量估计值之间没有显著差异。结论:99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT模拟在90y玻璃微球治疗中提供了有价值的剂量预测。尽管90Y-PET/MR在体积测量和剂量估计方面存在差异,但99mTc-MAA模拟的预测值并未受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current radiopharmaceuticals
Current radiopharmaceuticals PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Harnessing Radionuclides: Unveiling the Promising Role of Radiopharmaceuticals in Cancer Theranostics and Palliative Care. The Estimation Value of 99mTc-MAA in Comparison with 90Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies. Enhancing Ketoprofen Solubility: A Strategic Approach Using Solid Dispersion and Response Surface Methodology. Preclinical Aspects of [89Zr]Zr-DFO-Rituximab: A High Potential Agent for Immuno-PET Imaging. Apigenin's Influence on Inflammatory and Epigenetic Responses in Rat Lungs After Radiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1