The Estimation Value of 99mTc-MAA in Comparison with 90Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Current radiopharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859
Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir
{"title":"The Estimation Value of <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA in Comparison with <sup>90</sup>Y-PET/MR-based Dosimetry in Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT) for Liver Malignancies.","authors":"Nami Yeyin, Mohammad Abuqbeitah, Aysel Namazova, Mustafa Demir","doi":"10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA SPECT/CT and <sup>90</sup>Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by <sup>90</sup>Y-glass microspheres.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over <sup>90</sup>Y-PET/MR images after <sup>90</sup>Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit<sup>90</sup>Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean tumor dose was 270 ± 111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ± 12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55 ± 18 Gy from <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA simulation. <sup>90</sup>Y-PET/MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271 ± 125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25 ± 12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was deduced that <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in <sup>90</sup>Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with <sup>90</sup>Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MAA simulation was not affected.</p>","PeriodicalId":10991,"journal":{"name":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","volume":" ","pages":"174-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current radiopharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118744710333819250112153859","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study intended to compare the radiation dose estimates to target and nontarget liver compartments from 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT and 90Y-PET/MR scans in liver tumors treated by 90Y-glass microspheres.

Materials and methods: Dose estimation was performed for twenty-three eligible patients (13M, 10F) after 99mTc-MAA simulation using SPECT/CT imaging, and over 90Y-PET/MR images after 90Y-microsphere therapy. Simplicit90Y™ software was used for voxel-based dosimetry over the liver parenchyma. Dose estimates were obtained for whole healthy liver (HL), healthy injected liver (HIL), and tumor volumes. Pearson correlation, Bland-Altman plot, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean tumor dose was 270 ± 111 Gy, the whole liver parenchyma dose was 26 ± 12 Gy, and the healthy injected liver dose was 55 ± 18 Gy from 99mTc-MAA simulation. 90Y-PET/MR dosimetry yielded a mean tumor dose of 271 ± 125 Gy, a HIL mean dose of 54±18 Gy, and a liver parenchyma dose of 25 ± 12 Gy. An excellent agreement was demonstrated between tumor doses (R2=0.90) and liver doses (R2=0.87), while the agreement was less for HIL doses (R2=0.80). Wilcoxon signed-ranks test yielded no significant difference between the dose estimates for all liver compartments.

Conclusion: It was deduced that 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT simulation provides valuable dose prediction in 90Y-glass microsphere therapy. Despite the difference in volume measurements and dose estimates with 90Y-PET/MR, the predictive value of the 99mTc-MAA simulation was not affected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
99mTc-MAA与90Y-PET/ mr剂量法在肝脏恶性肿瘤选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)中的价值比较
目的:本研究旨在比较90y玻璃微球治疗肝脏肿瘤时,99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT和90Y-PET/MR扫描对靶区和非靶区辐射剂量的估计。材料和方法:对23例符合条件的患者(13M, 10F)进行SPECT/CT 99mTc-MAA模拟后的剂量估计,并对90y微球治疗后超过90y的pet /MR图像进行剂量估计。使用Simplicit90Y™软件对肝实质进行基于体素的剂量测定。获得了整个健康肝脏(HL)、健康注射肝脏(HIL)和肿瘤体积的剂量估计。采用Pearson相关、Bland-Altman图和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行统计分析。结果:99mTc-MAA模拟的肿瘤平均剂量为270±111 Gy,全肝实质剂量为26±12 Gy,健康肝脏注射剂量为55±18 Gy。90YPET/ MR剂量测定显示肿瘤平均剂量为271±125 Gy, HIL平均剂量为54±18 Gy,肝实质剂量为25±12 Gy。肿瘤剂量(R2=0.90)和肝脏剂量(R2=0.87)之间的一致性很好,而HIL剂量的一致性较低(R2=0.80)。Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示所有肝室的剂量估计值之间没有显著差异。结论:99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT模拟在90y玻璃微球治疗中提供了有价值的剂量预测。尽管90Y-PET/MR在体积测量和剂量估计方面存在差异,但99mTc-MAA模拟的预测值并未受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current radiopharmaceuticals
Current radiopharmaceuticals PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Development of [64Cu]Cu-NODAGA-RGD-BBN as a Novel Radiotracer for Dual Integrin and GRPR-targeted Tumor PET Imaging. Radiopharmaceuticals Adverse Events Management. Biological Efficacy of Ionizing Radiation Sources on 3D Organotypic Tissue Slices Assessed by Fluorescence Microscopy. Guideline Adherence as an Indicator of PET Scan Overuse in an Italian Teaching Hospital: An Observational Study. Pressed Solid Target Production of 89Zr and its Application for Antibody Labelling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1