Ancillary tests for brain death.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1491263
Shyam Duvuru, Vivek Sanker, Rajeeb Kumar Mishra, Arvind K Sharma, Shir Lynn Lim, Nisha Baskar, Vijay K Sharma
{"title":"Ancillary tests for brain death.","authors":"Shyam Duvuru, Vivek Sanker, Rajeeb Kumar Mishra, Arvind K Sharma, Shir Lynn Lim, Nisha Baskar, Vijay K Sharma","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1491263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ancillary tests are often used in the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), especially when the clinical examination is inconclusive. DNC is widely accepted, as defined by the comprehensive report of the World Brain Death Project. However, there are several medical, legal, religious, ethical, and social controversies. Accordingly, \"premature\" and \"delayed\" diagnoses of brain death attract these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Depending upon the availability and experience of the managing medical teams, various ancillary tests are employed for an early and supplementary diagnosis of brain death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We describe the practicality, test performance, and utility of some of the commonly employed ancillary tests for the diagnosis of brain death in clinical practice, along with their case examples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brain death is a clinical diagnosis determined by history, physical examination, and adherence to recommended criteria. All ancillary investigations are used as supplementary tests with variable accuracy parameters. These ancillary tests often facilitate an early and \"timely\" diagnosis of brain death.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1491263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1491263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ancillary tests are often used in the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), especially when the clinical examination is inconclusive. DNC is widely accepted, as defined by the comprehensive report of the World Brain Death Project. However, there are several medical, legal, religious, ethical, and social controversies. Accordingly, "premature" and "delayed" diagnoses of brain death attract these issues.

Methods: Depending upon the availability and experience of the managing medical teams, various ancillary tests are employed for an early and supplementary diagnosis of brain death.

Results: We describe the practicality, test performance, and utility of some of the commonly employed ancillary tests for the diagnosis of brain death in clinical practice, along with their case examples.

Conclusion: Brain death is a clinical diagnosis determined by history, physical examination, and adherence to recommended criteria. All ancillary investigations are used as supplementary tests with variable accuracy parameters. These ancillary tests often facilitate an early and "timely" diagnosis of brain death.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑死亡的辅助测试
背景:辅助试验常用于根据神经学标准(DNC)确定死亡,特别是当临床检查不确定时。根据世界脑死亡项目的综合报告,DNC被广泛接受。然而,在医学、法律、宗教、伦理和社会方面存在一些争议。因此,脑死亡的“过早”和“延迟”诊断引起了这些问题。方法:根据管理医疗团队的可用性和经验,采用各种辅助测试来早期和补充诊断脑死亡。结果:我们描述的实用性,测试性能和效用的一些常用辅助测试诊断脑死亡的临床实践,以及他们的案例。结论:脑死亡是一种由病史、体格检查和遵守推荐标准确定的临床诊断。所有辅助调查都用作具有可变精度参数的补充试验。这些辅助检查通常有助于早期和“及时”诊断脑死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Neural correlates of connected speech indices in acquired neurological disorders. Enhancing ALS disease management: exploring integrated user value through online communities evidence. Use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Development and validation of a diagnostic model for migraine without aura in inpatients. Editorial: Translational neuroeconomic approach: from economic decision making to neuropsychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1