Neuropsychological outcome of indoor rehabilitation in post-COVID-19 condition-results of the PoCoRe study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1486751
Michael Jöbges, Melanie Tempfli, Christoph Kohl, Christoph Herrmann, Stefan Kelm, Alexa Kupferschmitt, Ida Montanari, Nike Walter, Gerhard Suetfels, Thomas Loew, Volker Köllner, Thilo Hinterberger
{"title":"Neuropsychological outcome of indoor rehabilitation in post-COVID-19 condition-results of the PoCoRe study.","authors":"Michael Jöbges, Melanie Tempfli, Christoph Kohl, Christoph Herrmann, Stefan Kelm, Alexa Kupferschmitt, Ida Montanari, Nike Walter, Gerhard Suetfels, Thomas Loew, Volker Köllner, Thilo Hinterberger","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1486751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post COVID-19 condition (PCC) is increasingly recognized as a debilitating condition characterized by persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neuropsychological deficits, including cognitive impairments and fatigue, are prevalent in individuals with PCC. The PoCoRe study aimed to evaluate the burden of neuropsychological deficits in PCC patients undergoing multidisciplinary indoor rehabilitation and to describe possible changes in this symptomatology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PoCoRe study, a prospective, non-randomized, controlled longitudinal study, recruited PCC patients from six German indoor rehabilitation centers. Eligible participants underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments at admission and discharge. Various measures were employed, including the fatigue scale for motor functioning and cognition (FSMC), the Test Battery for Attention (TAP) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 1,086 recruited participants, a total of <i>N</i> = 701 participants were included in the main data analysis. The prevalence of fatigue on admission was high (84.6%) and decreased significantly by discharge (77.4%), with a mild effect size. Reaction times on the alertness subtest were abnormal in 70% of patients on admission and 50% on discharge. Sustained attention was abnormal in 55% of patients on admission, decreasing to 43% on discharge. These differences were significant with mild effect sizes. Furthermore, of the 27% of participants with pathological MoCA scores at admission, 63% improved to normative levels during rehabilitation, indicating a significant treatment effect (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). However, the MoCA demonstrated limited sensitivity in detecting attention deficits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PoCoRe study highlights the high prevalence of neuropsychological deficits and fatigue in PCC patients, with notable improvements observed following multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Challenges remain in accurately identifying and addressing these deficits, underscoring the importance of comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and tailored rehabilitation interventions. Further research is warranted to optimize screening tools and enhance neuropsychological care for PCC patients in both rehabilitation and outpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1486751"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743264/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1486751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post COVID-19 condition (PCC) is increasingly recognized as a debilitating condition characterized by persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Neuropsychological deficits, including cognitive impairments and fatigue, are prevalent in individuals with PCC. The PoCoRe study aimed to evaluate the burden of neuropsychological deficits in PCC patients undergoing multidisciplinary indoor rehabilitation and to describe possible changes in this symptomatology.

Methods: The PoCoRe study, a prospective, non-randomized, controlled longitudinal study, recruited PCC patients from six German indoor rehabilitation centers. Eligible participants underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessments at admission and discharge. Various measures were employed, including the fatigue scale for motor functioning and cognition (FSMC), the Test Battery for Attention (TAP) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Results: Out of the 1,086 recruited participants, a total of N = 701 participants were included in the main data analysis. The prevalence of fatigue on admission was high (84.6%) and decreased significantly by discharge (77.4%), with a mild effect size. Reaction times on the alertness subtest were abnormal in 70% of patients on admission and 50% on discharge. Sustained attention was abnormal in 55% of patients on admission, decreasing to 43% on discharge. These differences were significant with mild effect sizes. Furthermore, of the 27% of participants with pathological MoCA scores at admission, 63% improved to normative levels during rehabilitation, indicating a significant treatment effect (p ≤ 0.001). However, the MoCA demonstrated limited sensitivity in detecting attention deficits.

Conclusion: The PoCoRe study highlights the high prevalence of neuropsychological deficits and fatigue in PCC patients, with notable improvements observed following multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Challenges remain in accurately identifying and addressing these deficits, underscoring the importance of comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and tailored rehabilitation interventions. Further research is warranted to optimize screening tools and enhance neuropsychological care for PCC patients in both rehabilitation and outpatient settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
covid -19后患者室内康复的神经心理结局——PoCoRe研究结果
背景:COVID-19后状态(PCC)越来越被认为是一种以SARS-CoV-2感染后持续症状为特征的衰弱状态。神经心理缺陷,包括认知障碍和疲劳,在PCC患者中普遍存在。PoCoRe研究旨在评估接受多学科室内康复治疗的PCC患者的神经心理缺陷负担,并描述这种症状的可能变化。方法:PoCoRe研究是一项前瞻性、非随机、对照的纵向研究,从六个德国室内康复中心招募了PCC患者。符合条件的参与者在入院和出院时接受了全面的神经心理学评估。采用了运动功能和认知疲劳量表(FSMC)、注意力测试单元(TAP)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)等多种测量方法。结果:在1086名招募的参与者中,共有N = 701名参与者被纳入主数据分析。入院时疲劳患病率高(84.6%),出院时明显下降(77.4%),效应量轻微。入院时70%的患者反应时间异常,出院时50%的患者反应时间异常。入院时持续注意力异常的患者占55%,出院时下降到43%。这些差异在轻度效应量下是显著的。此外,入院时病理MoCA评分为27%的参与者中,63%在康复期间改善到规范水平,表明治疗效果显著(p≤ 0.001)。然而,MoCA在检测注意缺陷方面表现出有限的敏感性。结论:PoCoRe研究强调了神经心理缺陷和疲劳在PCC患者中的高患病率,在多学科康复后观察到显着改善。在准确识别和解决这些缺陷方面仍然存在挑战,强调了全面的神经心理学评估和量身定制的康复干预的重要性。需要进一步的研究来优化筛查工具,并在康复和门诊环境中加强对PCC患者的神经心理学护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Neural correlates of connected speech indices in acquired neurological disorders. Enhancing ALS disease management: exploring integrated user value through online communities evidence. Use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Development and validation of a diagnostic model for migraine without aura in inpatients. Editorial: Translational neuroeconomic approach: from economic decision making to neuropsychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1