Interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and community health workers: a scoping review.

IF 4.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal for Equity in Health Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02377-7
Carole Bandiera, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Elizabeth Harris, Mark F Harris, Parisa Aslani
{"title":"Interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and community health workers: a scoping review.","authors":"Carole Bandiera, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Elizabeth Harris, Mark F Harris, Parisa Aslani","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02377-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community health workers (CHWs) help bridge the cultural gap between health services and the communities they serve. CHWs work with physicians, nurses and social workers, but little is known about their collaboration with pharmacists. This scoping review aims to describe the interprofessional collaboration between CHWs and pharmacists, the types of interventions they deliver and CHWs' and pharmacists' specific roles within these interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The scientific literature published in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL and the grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were that the research (i) involved pharmacists and CHWs working collaboratively and (ii) included an intervention, service or program. One researcher screened all articles, and two reviewers screened 6% of articles (20/340) assessed for eligibility, using the software Covidence. After the discrepancies were resolved, data from the included articles were extracted using a customized template for data extraction and synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA (14/18) and were published since 2020 (12/18). Most interventions involved medication reviews, support for medication adherence, disease prevention or addressing the social determinants of health. Pharmacists had primarily clinical roles (i.e., medication reconciliation and patient education), while the CHWs' roles consisted of collecting patient information, supporting patient self-management, bridging the cultural gap by translating information in the patient's language and ensuring patient follow-up. The collaborative practice occurred via interprofessional referral, ranging from the CHW facilitating the link between the patient and the pharmacist, and information sharing between the CHW and the pharmacist, to an interprofessional collaborative practice where CHWs and pharmacists delivered the intervention together.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While CHWs and pharmacists had independent roles as part of the interventions, they also collaborated at various levels to deliver services to patients. CHWs have an important role to play in bridging the cultural gap between the patient and the pharmacist, in improving patient referral so that more patients can benefit from pharmaceutical services, and in identifying patients' social determinants of health. CHWs and pharmacists can work synergistically and collaboratively to tailor an intervention to the patient's needs, which can improve and optimize pharmaceutical services, and may ultimately positively impact health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11752743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02377-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Community health workers (CHWs) help bridge the cultural gap between health services and the communities they serve. CHWs work with physicians, nurses and social workers, but little is known about their collaboration with pharmacists. This scoping review aims to describe the interprofessional collaboration between CHWs and pharmacists, the types of interventions they deliver and CHWs' and pharmacists' specific roles within these interventions.

Method: The scientific literature published in PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, CINAHL and the grey literature were searched. Inclusion criteria were that the research (i) involved pharmacists and CHWs working collaboratively and (ii) included an intervention, service or program. One researcher screened all articles, and two reviewers screened 6% of articles (20/340) assessed for eligibility, using the software Covidence. After the discrepancies were resolved, data from the included articles were extracted using a customized template for data extraction and synthesized narratively.

Results: Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the USA (14/18) and were published since 2020 (12/18). Most interventions involved medication reviews, support for medication adherence, disease prevention or addressing the social determinants of health. Pharmacists had primarily clinical roles (i.e., medication reconciliation and patient education), while the CHWs' roles consisted of collecting patient information, supporting patient self-management, bridging the cultural gap by translating information in the patient's language and ensuring patient follow-up. The collaborative practice occurred via interprofessional referral, ranging from the CHW facilitating the link between the patient and the pharmacist, and information sharing between the CHW and the pharmacist, to an interprofessional collaborative practice where CHWs and pharmacists delivered the intervention together.

Conclusion: While CHWs and pharmacists had independent roles as part of the interventions, they also collaborated at various levels to deliver services to patients. CHWs have an important role to play in bridging the cultural gap between the patient and the pharmacist, in improving patient referral so that more patients can benefit from pharmaceutical services, and in identifying patients' social determinants of health. CHWs and pharmacists can work synergistically and collaboratively to tailor an intervention to the patient's needs, which can improve and optimize pharmaceutical services, and may ultimately positively impact health outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师和社区卫生工作者之间的跨专业合作:范围审查。
社区卫生工作者(chw)有助于弥合卫生服务与他们所服务的社区之间的文化差距。卫生保健员与医生、护士和社会工作者合作,但对他们与药剂师的合作知之甚少。本综述旨在描述卫生工作者和药剂师之间的跨专业合作、他们提供的干预措施类型以及卫生工作者和药剂师在这些干预措施中的具体角色。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、PsycInfo、CINAHL等网站发表的科学文献及灰色文献。纳入标准是研究(i)涉及药剂师和卫生保健员的合作,(ii)包括干预、服务或项目。一名研究人员筛选了所有的文章,两名审稿人使用covid - ence软件筛选了6%的文章(20/340)。在解决差异后,使用定制的数据提取模板从纳入的文章中提取数据并进行叙述合成。结果:18项研究符合纳入标准。大多数在美国进行(14/18),并于2020年(12/18)发布。大多数干预措施涉及药物审查、支持药物依从性、疾病预防或解决健康的社会决定因素。药师主要承担临床角色(即药物调解和患者教育),而卫生保健员的角色包括收集患者信息,支持患者自我管理,通过翻译患者语言来弥合文化差异,并确保患者随访。合作实践是通过跨专业转诊进行的,从保健医生促进病人和药剂师之间的联系,以及保健医生和药剂师之间的信息共享,到保健医生和药剂师一起提供干预的跨专业合作实践。结论:作为干预措施的一部分,卫生保健员和药剂师在不同层面上相互合作,为患者提供服务。在消除病人与药剂师之间的文化差异、改善病人转介,让更多病人受惠于药剂服务,以及找出影响病人健康的社会因素等方面,保健科可发挥重要作用。卫生保健员和药剂师可以协同合作,根据患者的需要量身定制干预措施,这可以改善和优化药物服务,并可能最终对健康结果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
期刊最新文献
Health economics assessment of statin therapy initiation thresholds for atherosclerosis prevention in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Individual well-being and national determinants of screening mammography among women over fifty. Social determinants of occupational injuries among US-based commercial fishermen: a systematic review. Demographic disparities in access to COVID-19 clinical trial sites across the United States: a geospatial analysis. Impact of care guilt on the health status of female medical staff: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1