Complications of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive techniques compared with spontaneous.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Gaceta medica de Mexico Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.24875/GMM.M24000933
Maritza García-Espinosa, Claudia E Manríquez-de Jesús, Carlos F Rosales-Murillo, Felipe Caldiño-Soto
{"title":"Complications of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive techniques compared with spontaneous.","authors":"Maritza García-Espinosa, Claudia E Manríquez-de Jesús, Carlos F Rosales-Murillo, Felipe Caldiño-Soto","doi":"10.24875/GMM.M24000933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Twin pregnancy through assisted reproduction techniques is increasing, as are the associated complications.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare maternal and perinatal complications associated with spontaneous twin pregnancy and through assisted reproduction techniques (ART).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective comparative and controlled study. It included 208 patients treated at the UMAE HGO 4 of the IMSS, divided into two groups according to the method of conception (spontaneous vs ART), comparing maternal and perinatal complications. Quantitative variables were compared with the student's T or Mann Whitney U test and qualitative variables with the chi-square test. The probability ratio was calculated with a 95 % confidence interval, with statistical significance p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>208 patients with twin pregnancies were included; 104 (50%) conceived spontaneously and 104 (50%) by assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Maternal complications were higher in the ART group: preterm delivery (84.6 vs 60.5%), hypertensive disease (43.2 vs 19.2%), gestational diabetes (38.1 vs 24.8%), and obstetric hemorrhage (41.9 vs 25.7%). Prematurity and respiratory distress syndrome were significantly higher in the ART group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twin pregnancy due to ART increases the risk of maternal and perinatal complications, which forces us to improve prenatal control with a risk approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":12736,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta medica de Mexico","volume":"160 4","pages":"384-392"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta medica de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.M24000933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Twin pregnancy through assisted reproduction techniques is increasing, as are the associated complications.

Objective: Compare maternal and perinatal complications associated with spontaneous twin pregnancy and through assisted reproduction techniques (ART).

Material and methods: Retrospective comparative and controlled study. It included 208 patients treated at the UMAE HGO 4 of the IMSS, divided into two groups according to the method of conception (spontaneous vs ART), comparing maternal and perinatal complications. Quantitative variables were compared with the student's T or Mann Whitney U test and qualitative variables with the chi-square test. The probability ratio was calculated with a 95 % confidence interval, with statistical significance p < 0.05.

Results: 208 patients with twin pregnancies were included; 104 (50%) conceived spontaneously and 104 (50%) by assisted reproductive techniques (ART). Maternal complications were higher in the ART group: preterm delivery (84.6 vs 60.5%), hypertensive disease (43.2 vs 19.2%), gestational diabetes (38.1 vs 24.8%), and obstetric hemorrhage (41.9 vs 25.7%). Prematurity and respiratory distress syndrome were significantly higher in the ART group.

Conclusions: Twin pregnancy due to ART increases the risk of maternal and perinatal complications, which forces us to improve prenatal control with a risk approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辅助生殖技术与自然受孕双胎的并发症比较。
导言:通过辅助生殖技术的双胎妊娠正在增加,相关并发症也在增加。目的:比较自然双胎妊娠和辅助生殖技术(ART)相关的孕产妇和围产期并发症。材料和方法:回顾性比较和对照研究。它包括在IMSS的UMAE HGO 4治疗的208例患者,根据受孕方法分为两组(自然受孕与抗逆转录病毒治疗),比较孕产妇和围产期并发症。定量变量比较采用学生T检验或Mann Whitney U检验,定性变量比较采用卡方检验。以95%置信区间计算概率比,差异有统计学意义p < 0.05。结果:共纳入双胎妊娠患者208例;104例(50%)自然受孕,104例(50%)通过辅助生殖技术受孕。ART组的产妇并发症更高:早产(84.6比60.5%)、高血压(43.2比19.2%)、妊娠期糖尿病(38.1比24.8%)和产科出血(41.9比25.7%)。ART组早产和呼吸窘迫综合征发生率明显高于ART组。结论:ART导致双胎妊娠增加了孕产妇和围产期并发症的风险,这迫使我们加强产前控制,采取风险方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta medica de Mexico
Gaceta medica de Mexico 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gaceta Médica de México México is the official scientific journal of the Academia Nacional de Medicina de México, A.C. Its goal is to contribute to health professionals by publishing the most relevant progress both in research and clinical practice. Gaceta Médica de México is a bimonthly peer reviewed journal, published both in paper and online in open access, both in Spanish and English. It has a brilliant editorial board formed by national and international experts.
期刊最新文献
[Authors' reply to the letter "Guillain-Barré syndrome before and during the COVID-19 pandemic"]. [Authors' reply to the letter to the editor "Artificial intelligence and screening for visual impairment related to diabetic retinopathy and macular edema"]. [Non-therapeutic hysterectomy in Mexican young females with intellectual disability: a problematized reality]. [Artificial intelligence and screening for visual impairment related to diabetic retinopathy and macular edema]. [Comment on the article "Guillain-Barre syndrome before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a referral center of Mexico"].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1