Sibylle Cocciardi, Maral Saadati, Nina Weiß, Daniela Späth, Silke Kapp-Schwoerer, Isabelle Schneider, Annika Meid, Verena I. Gaidzik, Sabrina Skambraks, Walter Fiedler, Michael W. M. Kühn, Ulrich Germing, Karin T. Mayer, Michael Lübbert, Elli Papaemmanuil, Felicitas Thol, Michael Heuser, Arnold Ganser, Lars Bullinger, Axel Benner, Hartmut Döhner, Konstanze Döhner
{"title":"Impact of myelodysplasia-related and additional gene mutations in intensively treated patients with NPM1-mutated AML","authors":"Sibylle Cocciardi, Maral Saadati, Nina Weiß, Daniela Späth, Silke Kapp-Schwoerer, Isabelle Schneider, Annika Meid, Verena I. Gaidzik, Sabrina Skambraks, Walter Fiedler, Michael W. M. Kühn, Ulrich Germing, Karin T. Mayer, Michael Lübbert, Elli Papaemmanuil, Felicitas Thol, Michael Heuser, Arnold Ganser, Lars Bullinger, Axel Benner, Hartmut Döhner, Konstanze Döhner","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the myelodysplasia-related gene (MRG) as well as additional gene mutations on outcomes in intensively treated patients with <i>NPM1</i>-mutated (<i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup>) AML. Targeted DNA sequencing of 263 genes was performed in 568 <i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup> AML patients (median age: 59 years) entered into the prospective AMLSG 09-09 treatment trial. Most commonly co-mutated genes were <i>DNMT3A</i> (49.8%), <i>FLT3</i>-TKD (25.9%), <i>PTPN11</i> (24.8%), <i>NRAS</i> (22.7%), <i>TET2</i> (21.7%), <i>IDH2</i> (21.3%), <i>IDH1</i> (18%), and <i>FLT3</i>-ITD (17.3%). MRG mutations were identified in 18.1% of cases (18–60 years: 9.8%; >60 years: 28.7%). When focusing on the 470 patients with 2022 ELN favorable-risk <i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup> AML, multivariable analysis for event-free survival (EFS) identified age (<i>p</i> < 0.001), <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>R882</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.001), <i>IDH1</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.007), and MRG mutations (<i>p</i> = 0.03) as unfavorable factors, cohesin gene co-mutations (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (<i>p</i> = 0.007) as favorable factors. Restricting the analysis to a subset of CR/CRi patients with available data on <i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup> measurable residual disease (MRD) status in blood post cycle 2 in the model, MRG mutations lost their significant effect, whereas <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>R882</sup>, <i>MYC</i>, and cohesin gene mutations retained the adverse and favorable effects. For OS, age (<i>p</i> < 0.001), <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>R882</sup> (<i>p</i> = 0.042), <i>IDH1</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.045), and <i>KRAS</i> (0.003) mutations were unfavorable factors, sole favorable factor was <i>IDH2</i> co-mutation (<i>p</i> = 0.037). In 2022 ELN favorable-risk <i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup> AML, MRG mutations are associated with inferior EFS; however, this effect is no longer present when considering <i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup> MRD status post cycle 2; <i>DNMT3A</i><sup>R882</sup> and <i>MYC</i> mutations remained adverse, and cohesin gene mutations favorable prognostic factors independent of the <i>NPM1</i><sup>mut</sup> MRD status.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11733593/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HemaSphere","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hem3.70060","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the myelodysplasia-related gene (MRG) as well as additional gene mutations on outcomes in intensively treated patients with NPM1-mutated (NPM1mut) AML. Targeted DNA sequencing of 263 genes was performed in 568 NPM1mut AML patients (median age: 59 years) entered into the prospective AMLSG 09-09 treatment trial. Most commonly co-mutated genes were DNMT3A (49.8%), FLT3-TKD (25.9%), PTPN11 (24.8%), NRAS (22.7%), TET2 (21.7%), IDH2 (21.3%), IDH1 (18%), and FLT3-ITD (17.3%). MRG mutations were identified in 18.1% of cases (18–60 years: 9.8%; >60 years: 28.7%). When focusing on the 470 patients with 2022 ELN favorable-risk NPM1mut AML, multivariable analysis for event-free survival (EFS) identified age (p < 0.001), DNMT3AR882 (p < 0.001), IDH1 (p = 0.007), and MRG mutations (p = 0.03) as unfavorable factors, cohesin gene co-mutations (p = 0.001) and treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (p = 0.007) as favorable factors. Restricting the analysis to a subset of CR/CRi patients with available data on NPM1mut measurable residual disease (MRD) status in blood post cycle 2 in the model, MRG mutations lost their significant effect, whereas DNMT3AR882, MYC, and cohesin gene mutations retained the adverse and favorable effects. For OS, age (p < 0.001), DNMT3AR882 (p = 0.042), IDH1 (p = 0.045), and KRAS (0.003) mutations were unfavorable factors, sole favorable factor was IDH2 co-mutation (p = 0.037). In 2022 ELN favorable-risk NPM1mut AML, MRG mutations are associated with inferior EFS; however, this effect is no longer present when considering NPM1mut MRD status post cycle 2; DNMT3AR882 and MYC mutations remained adverse, and cohesin gene mutations favorable prognostic factors independent of the NPM1mut MRD status.
期刊介绍:
HemaSphere, as a publication, is dedicated to disseminating the outcomes of profoundly pertinent basic, translational, and clinical research endeavors within the field of hematology. The journal actively seeks robust studies that unveil novel discoveries with significant ramifications for hematology.
In addition to original research, HemaSphere features review articles and guideline articles that furnish lucid synopses and discussions of emerging developments, along with recommendations for patient care.
Positioned as the foremost resource in hematology, HemaSphere augments its offerings with specialized sections like HemaTopics and HemaPolicy. These segments engender insightful dialogues covering a spectrum of hematology-related topics, including digestible summaries of pivotal articles, updates on new therapies, deliberations on European policy matters, and other noteworthy news items within the field. Steering the course of HemaSphere are Editor in Chief Jan Cools and Deputy Editor in Chief Claire Harrison, alongside the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board comprising international luminaries in both research and clinical realms, each representing diverse areas of hematologic expertise.