首页 > 最新文献

HemaSphere最新文献

英文 中文
Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: From diagnosis to molecular features and therapeutic options 非典型慢性髓性白血病:从诊断到分子特征和治疗选择。
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70270
Alessandra Iurlo, Daniele Cattaneo, Umberto Gianelli, Francesco Passamonti

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a rare form of myelodysplastic (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap disorder characterized by neutrophilic leukocytosis with circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC), frequent hepatosplenomegaly, and poor prognosis with high rates of leukemic transformation. In the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, aCML was therefore renamed to “MDS/MPN with neutrophilia.” Diagnostic criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥ 13 × 109/L, circulating IMC ≥ 10%, dysgranulopoiesis, and at least one cytopenia for MDS-thresholds (per International Consensus Classification [ICC]). Bone marrow is hypercellular due to granulocytic proliferation, associated with dysplasia in granulocytes ± other cell lines. Mutations can be used to support the diagnosis in both classifications, that is, SETBP1 and ASXL1 or SETBP1 and/or ETNK1. Absence of monocytosis, basophilia, or eosinophilia, <20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions are mandatory. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in roughly 20%–40% of aCML patients, along with a complex genomic context with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in ASXL1, SETBP1, SRSF2, TET2, EZH2, and, less frequently, in NRAS/KRAS, CBL, CSF3R, JAK2, and ETNK1. Unfortunately, effective risk stratification systems for identifying prognostic subgroups of aCML patients are lacking, resulting in the absence of a standard of care for its management. The most used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, hypomethylating agents, and JAK inhibitors, although none of them are disease-modifying. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant remains the only potentially curative approach and should be considered in all eligible patients. Actionable mutations (CSF3R, NRAS/KRAS, and KIT) have also been identified, supporting the development of new agents targeting the involved pathways.

非典型慢性髓系白血病(aCML)是一种罕见的骨髓增生异常(MDS)/骨髓增生性肿瘤(MPN)重叠疾病,其特征是中性粒细胞增多伴循环未成熟髓系细胞(IMC),频繁出现肝脾肿大,预后差,白血病转化率高。因此,在2022年世界卫生组织(WHO)的分类中,aCML更名为“MDS/MPN伴中性粒细胞增多症”。aCML的诊断标准包括白细胞增多≥13 × 109/L,循环IMC≥10%,粒细胞增生异常,mds阈值至少有一个细胞减少(根据国际共识分类[ICC])。骨髓因粒细胞增生而呈高细胞性,与粒细胞±其他细胞系的异常增生有关。突变可用于支持两种分类的诊断,即SETBP1和ASXL1或SETBP1和/或ETNK1。缺乏单核细胞增多症、嗜碱性粒细胞增多症或嗜酸性粒细胞增多症、ASXL1、SETBP1、SRSF2、TET2、EZH2,以及较少出现的NRAS/KRAS、CBL、CSF3R、JAK2和ETNK1。不幸的是,缺乏有效的风险分层系统来识别aCML患者的预后亚组,导致其管理缺乏标准的护理。最常用的药物包括羟基脲、干扰素、低甲基化剂和JAK抑制剂,尽管它们都不能改善疾病。同种异体造血干细胞移植仍然是唯一潜在的治疗方法,应该在所有符合条件的患者中考虑。可操作突变(CSF3R, NRAS/KRAS和KIT)也已被确定,支持针对相关途径的新药物的开发。
{"title":"Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: From diagnosis to molecular features and therapeutic options","authors":"Alessandra Iurlo,&nbsp;Daniele Cattaneo,&nbsp;Umberto Gianelli,&nbsp;Francesco Passamonti","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70270","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hem3.70270","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a rare form of myelodysplastic (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) overlap disorder characterized by neutrophilic leukocytosis with circulating immature myeloid cells (IMC), frequent hepatosplenomegaly, and poor prognosis with high rates of leukemic transformation. In the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, aCML was therefore renamed to “MDS/MPN with neutrophilia.” Diagnostic criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥ 13 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, circulating IMC ≥ 10%, dysgranulopoiesis, and at least one cytopenia for MDS-thresholds (per International Consensus Classification [ICC]). Bone marrow is hypercellular due to granulocytic proliferation, associated with dysplasia in granulocytes ± other cell lines. Mutations can be used to support the diagnosis in both classifications, that is, <i>SETBP1</i> and <i>ASXL1</i> or <i>SETBP1</i> and/or <i>ETNK1</i>. Absence of monocytosis, basophilia, or eosinophilia, &lt;20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions are mandatory. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in roughly 20%–40% of aCML patients, along with a complex genomic context with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in <i>ASXL1</i>, <i>SETBP1</i>, <i>SRSF2</i>, <i>TET2</i>, <i>EZH2</i>, and, less frequently, in <i>NRAS/KRAS</i>, <i>CBL</i>, <i>CSF3R</i>, <i>JAK2</i>, and <i>ETNK1</i>. Unfortunately, effective risk stratification systems for identifying prognostic subgroups of aCML patients are lacking, resulting in the absence of a standard of care for its management. The most used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, hypomethylating agents, and JAK inhibitors, although none of them are disease-modifying. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant remains the only potentially curative approach and should be considered in all eligible patients. Actionable mutations (<i>CSF3R</i>, <i>NRAS/KRAS</i>, and <i>KIT</i>) have also been identified, supporting the development of new agents targeting the involved pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12687300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145722510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Posttransplantation clonal dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells carrying prenatal and early-life DNMT3A mutations 携带产前和早期DNMT3A突变的造血干细胞移植后克隆动力学。
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-09 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70262
Lucca L. M. Derks, Konradin F. Müskens, Markus J. van Roosmalen, Aniek O. de Graaf, Nina Epskamp, Laurianne Trabut, Rico Hagelaar, Joop H. Jansen, Caroline A. Lindemans, Maaike G. J. M. van Bergen, Ruben van Boxtel, Mirjam E. Belderbos

Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), a prevalent and premalignant state in the elderly, has been detected in young individuals under selective pressures such as hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the origin of CH and mutational processes underlying CH driver mutations in young blood systems remain unclear. Here, we used genome-wide somatic mutation profiles to retrospectively trace the origin of DNMT3A-mutant CH in three individuals, 14–41 years after childhood HCT. Both the rate and spectrum of somatic mutations in individuals with posttransplant CH were consistent with normal age-associated mutagenesis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that DNMT3A-mutant HSPCs were present in the donor before 6.8 years of age, including during fetal development, despite being undetectable with a limit of detection of variant allele frequency of 0.001 at the time of transplantation. These findings were validated by comparing the observed mutations to expected age-dependent mutational signatures. Our results reveal that undetectable DNMT3A-mutant clones in young donors can expand into significant CH clones within decades upon transplantation. The rapid expansion of these clones in this context indicates that specific environmental pressures, rather than solely mutation acquisition, drive the development of CH.

克隆造血(CH)在老年人中是一种普遍的癌前状态,在选择压力下,如造血细胞移植(HCT),在年轻人中也被检测到。然而,年轻血液系统中CH的起源和驱动突变的突变过程仍不清楚。在这里,我们使用全基因组体细胞突变谱来追溯三个个体的dnmt3a突变CH的起源,这些个体在儿童期HCT后14-41年。移植后CH个体的体细胞突变率和谱与正常年龄相关的突变一致。系统发育分析显示,尽管在移植时无法检测到变异等位基因频率的极限为0.001,但在6.8岁之前,包括胎儿发育期间,供体中就存在dnmt3a突变的HSPCs。通过将观察到的突变与预期的年龄依赖性突变特征进行比较,这些发现得到了验证。我们的研究结果表明,在年轻供体中检测不到的dnmt3a突变克隆可以在移植后的几十年内扩展为显著的CH克隆。在这种情况下,这些克隆的快速扩张表明,特定的环境压力,而不仅仅是突变获取,推动了CH的发展。
{"title":"Posttransplantation clonal dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells carrying prenatal and early-life DNMT3A mutations","authors":"Lucca L. M. Derks,&nbsp;Konradin F. Müskens,&nbsp;Markus J. van Roosmalen,&nbsp;Aniek O. de Graaf,&nbsp;Nina Epskamp,&nbsp;Laurianne Trabut,&nbsp;Rico Hagelaar,&nbsp;Joop H. Jansen,&nbsp;Caroline A. Lindemans,&nbsp;Maaike G. J. M. van Bergen,&nbsp;Ruben van Boxtel,&nbsp;Mirjam E. Belderbos","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70262","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hem3.70262","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Clonal hematopoiesis (CH), a prevalent and premalignant state in the elderly, has been detected in young individuals under selective pressures such as hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the origin of CH and mutational processes underlying CH driver mutations in young blood systems remain unclear. Here, we used genome-wide somatic mutation profiles to retrospectively trace the origin of <i>DNMT3A</i>-mutant CH in three individuals, 14–41 years after childhood HCT. Both the rate and spectrum of somatic mutations in individuals with posttransplant CH were consistent with normal age-associated mutagenesis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that <i>DNMT3A</i>-mutant HSPCs were present in the donor before 6.8 years of age, including during fetal development, despite being undetectable with a limit of detection of variant allele frequency of 0.001 at the time of transplantation. These findings were validated by comparing the observed mutations to expected age-dependent mutational signatures. Our results reveal that undetectable <i>DNMT3A</i>-mutant clones in young donors can expand into significant CH clones within decades upon transplantation. The rapid expansion of these clones in this context indicates that specific environmental pressures, rather than solely mutation acquisition, drive the development of CH.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686829/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145721721","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Uncovering the ultra-frail: A distinct subgroup in non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma, with an inferior clinical outcome 揭示超虚弱:在不符合移植条件的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤患者中有一个独特的亚组,临床结果较差
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70268
Kazimierz Groen, Febe Smits, Kazem Nasserinejad, Mark-David Levin, Josien C. Regelink, Gert-Jan Timmers, Esther G. M. de Waal, Matthijs Westerman, Gerjo A. Velders, Koen de Heer, Rineke B. L. Leys, Roel J. W. van Kampen, Claudia A. M. Stege, Maarten R. Seefat, Inger S. Nijhof, Ellen van der Spek, Saskia K. Klein, Niels W. C. J. van de Donk, Paula F. Ypma, Sonja Zweegman
<p>Non-transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NTE-NDMM) who are categorized as frail according to the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI) show pronounced heterogeneity in clinical characteristics, leading to differences in frailty scores—ranging from 2 to 5—based on the type and number of geriatric impairments and comorbidities. As a result, clinical outcomes may differ markedly within this subgroup.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Indeed, a post hoc analysis of the HOVON-123 trial, in which patients were treated with nine cycles of dose-adjusted melphalan, prednisone, and bortezomib, revealed that the overall survival (OS) of frail patients with an IMWG-FI of 2 had an OS comparable to intermediate-fit patients and superior to frail patients with scores of 3–5. In addition, treatment discontinuation after 9 months was considerably higher in patients with higher frailty scores.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Accordingly, in the IFM 2017-03 trial, in which daratumumab–lenalidomide was compared with lenalidomide–dexamethasone, progression free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in patients with a frailty score of 2 compared to those with scores of 4–5.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Notably, a similar frailty score may capture distinct aging phenotypes: for example a score of 2 may solely result from advanced age or may reflect significant geriatric impairments in a younger individual. To address this heterogeneity, frail patients may be more rationally stratified based on the underlying drivers of frailty, yielding three frail subgroups: frail-by-age (>80 years, no comorbidities or impairments in [I]ADL), frail-by-impairments (≤80 years, with comorbidities and/or impairments in [I]ADL), and ultra-frail (>80 years, with comorbidities and/or impairments in [I]ADL). The prognostic impact of these three distinct frailty subgroups on OS has been variably reported. In the HOVON-143 trial, in which patients were treated with nine cycles of ixazomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (IDd) followed by a maintenance phase of IDd for a maximum of 2 years, patients classified frail-by-age-alone demonstrated superior OS, although the difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to limited sample size.<span><sup>4, 5</sup></span> In contrast, a retrospective analysis of the original IMWG-FI patient cohort reported comparable OS between patients classified frail-by-age-alone and all other frail patients.<span><sup>6</sup></span> To resolve this inconsistency, we examined the impact of frailty subtype on OS in a larger group size by pooling data of two prospective HOVON trials (HOVON-123 and HOVON-143) in NTE-NDMM patients. The studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the institutional review board and ethics committees before study initiation. All patients provided written informed consent.</p><p>The subsets of frail NTE-NDMM patients from the HOVON-12
根据国际骨髓瘤工作组虚弱指数(IMWG-FI),新诊断的符合移植条件的多发性骨髓瘤(NTE-NDMM)患者被归类为虚弱,其临床特征存在明显的异质性,导致虚弱评分的差异——基于老年损伤和合共病的类型和数量,虚弱评分从2到5不等。因此,该亚组的临床结果可能有显著差异事实上,HOVON-123试验的事后分析显示,imhg -fi为2的虚弱患者的总生存期(OS)与中等适应患者相当,优于评分为3-5的虚弱患者。在HOVON-123试验中,患者接受了9个周期的剂量调整的美法兰、强的松和硼替佐米治疗。此外,在虚弱评分较高的患者中,9个月后停药的比例明显更高因此,在IFM 2017-03试验中,将daratumumab -来那度胺与来那度胺-地塞米松进行比较,衰弱评分为2分的患者的无进展生存期(PFS)明显延长,而评分为4-5.3分的患者则明显延长。值得注意的是,相似的衰弱评分可能捕捉到不同的衰老表型:例如,评分为2分可能完全由高龄引起,也可能反映出年轻个体的显著老年损伤。为了解决这种异质性,虚弱患者可以根据虚弱的潜在驱动因素更合理地分层,产生三个虚弱亚组:年龄虚弱(80岁,无[I]ADL合并症和/或损伤),损伤虚弱(≤80岁,有[I]ADL合并症和/或损伤)和超虚弱(80岁,有[I]ADL合并症和/或损伤)。这三个不同的虚弱亚组对OS的预后影响有不同的报道。在HOVON-143试验中,患者接受了9个周期的伊沙唑米、达拉单抗和地塞米松(IDd)治疗,随后IDd维持期最长为2年,仅按年龄分类为虚弱的患者表现出更好的OS,尽管差异没有达到统计学意义,可能是由于样本量有限。相比之下,对原始IMWG-FI患者队列的回顾性分析报告了仅按年龄分类为虚弱的患者与所有其他虚弱患者之间的OS可比较为了解决这种不一致,我们通过汇集两项前瞻性HOVON试验(HOVON-123和HOVON-143)在NTE-NDMM患者中的数据,在更大的群体中研究了脆弱亚型对OS的影响。这些研究是按照赫尔辛基宣言进行的,并在研究开始前得到了机构审查委员会和伦理委员会的批准。所有患者均提供书面知情同意书。对HOVON-123和HOVON-143研究中虚弱的NTE-NDMM患者的亚群进行分析。研究细节之前已经发表过。4,7通过Wilcoxon秩和检验比较三个不同虚弱亚组的患者和疾病特征。生存结果采用Cox比例风险模型进行比较,并采用Kaplan-Meier方法进行可视化。为了解释潜在的混杂因素,在多变量分析中,PFS、PFS2和OS对基线疾病特征进行了校正,这些特征被认为是结果的重要预测因素。有关统计分析的进一步细节见补充方法。该分析共纳入202例体弱患者:33例(16%)仅因年龄而虚弱,94例(47%)因损伤而虚弱,75例(37%)极度虚弱。与因损伤而虚弱的患者(52%)和单纯因年龄而虚弱的患者(55%)相比,超虚弱患者的白蛋白水平显著降低(35 g/L; 74%) (P &lt; 0.01)。与单纯因年龄而虚弱的患者相比,超虚弱和因损伤而虚弱的亚组更频繁地表现为表现评分差(WHO表现状态[WHO]≥2,分别为9%、49%和43%,P &lt; 0.01)、β -2微球蛋白(B2M)水平升高(≥5.5 mg/L,分别为24%、55%和50%,P = 0.03)、国际分期系统(ISS) III期(分别为24%、55%和50%,P = 0.02)和修正型ISS (R-ISS) III期(分别为9%、20%和20%,P = 0.02)。乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平在虚弱亚组之间没有显著差异(表1)。未观察到PFS (P = 0.96)、PFS2 (P = 0.51)或OS (P = 0.99)的显著试验效应,允许合并分析。超虚弱患者的中位PFS为12.7个月(95% CI: 11.5-17.2),因损伤而虚弱的患者为16.5个月(95% CI: 12.9-21.9),仅因年龄而虚弱亚组为21.2个月(95% CI: 15.9-28.6)。在单因素和多因素分析中,LDH、B2M和白蛋白的组合是PFS的最强预测因子。 即使在LDH、B2M和白蛋白校正后,三个虚弱亚组之间的中位PFS也没有显著差异(图S1;表S1 - s3)。超虚弱患者的中位PFS2(22.4个月,95% CI: 17.2-31.6)明显短于因损伤而虚弱的患者(31.4个月,95% CI: 24.5-39.5)和单纯因年龄而虚弱的亚组(40.0个月,95% CI: 31.8-53.2)。在单因素和多因素分析中,B2M水平是PFS2的最强预测因子。在调整B2M水平后,与因损伤而虚弱的患者相比,B2M水平最高的超虚弱患者的PFS2持续显着缩短(风险比[HR] 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41, P = 0.04),但与单纯因年龄而虚弱的患者相比则没有明显缩短。因年龄而衰弱的患者和因损伤而衰弱的患者的PFS2无差异(图S2;表S1、S2和S4)。与其他两个亚组相比,超虚弱患者的中位生存期显著缩短:超虚弱患者为23.7个月(95% CI: 19.1-35.5),损伤所致虚弱患者为38.2个月(95% CI: 30.7-51.5),年龄所致虚弱患者为49.0个月(95% CI: 38.4-62.1)。在单因素和多因素分析中,B2M和白蛋白水平是OS的最强预测因子。在调整B2M和白蛋白水平后,与因损伤而衰弱的患者(HR 1.28, 95%CI 1.07-1.52, P &lt; 0.01)和因年龄而衰弱的患者(HR 1.92, 95%CI 1.14-3.22, P = 0.01)相比,超虚弱患者的OS仍然明显较短,表明衰弱亚组与OS独立相关。因年龄而衰弱的患者和因损伤而衰弱的患者的OS无差异(图1;表S1、S2和S5)。值得注意的是,与因损伤而虚弱的患者(2/94;2%)和因年龄而虚弱的患者(1/33;3%)相比,超虚弱患者的早期死亡率最高(治疗开始后2个月内:8/75;11%)(P &lt; 0.01)。在极度虚弱的患者中,早期死亡主要是由于疾病进展(3/8;38%),其次是感染(2/8;25%)、毒性(1/8,13%)和多因素原因(2/8;25%)(表S6)。此外,与因损伤而虚弱的患者(37%)和因年龄而虚弱的患者(36%)相比,超虚弱患者在9个周期内停止治疗的频率更高(60%)(P &lt; 0.01)(表S7)。超虚弱患者的治疗完成率最低,只有27%的患者完成了完整的治疗方案,而其他虚弱亚组的完成率为45%-47%(表S8)。最后,超虚弱患者经历了≥3级非血液学和血液学不良事件的最高发生率(表S9)。总体而言,202例患者中有121例(60%)接受了二线治疗。与因损伤而虚弱的患者(64/ 94,68%)和因年龄而虚弱的患者(24/ 33,73%)相比,超虚弱患者接受二线治疗的可能性较小(33/ 75,44%)(表S10)。最后,我们评估了各虚弱亚组间IMWG衰弱评分的动态。值得注意的是,由于早期停药率很高,动态衰弱只能在20/75(27%)的超虚弱患者中进行评估,在45/94(48%)的损伤性衰弱患者中进行评估,在17/33(52%)的单纯年龄性
{"title":"Uncovering the ultra-frail: A distinct subgroup in non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma, with an inferior clinical outcome","authors":"Kazimierz Groen,&nbsp;Febe Smits,&nbsp;Kazem Nasserinejad,&nbsp;Mark-David Levin,&nbsp;Josien C. Regelink,&nbsp;Gert-Jan Timmers,&nbsp;Esther G. M. de Waal,&nbsp;Matthijs Westerman,&nbsp;Gerjo A. Velders,&nbsp;Koen de Heer,&nbsp;Rineke B. L. Leys,&nbsp;Roel J. W. van Kampen,&nbsp;Claudia A. M. Stege,&nbsp;Maarten R. Seefat,&nbsp;Inger S. Nijhof,&nbsp;Ellen van der Spek,&nbsp;Saskia K. Klein,&nbsp;Niels W. C. J. van de Donk,&nbsp;Paula F. Ypma,&nbsp;Sonja Zweegman","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70268","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70268","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Non-transplant eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NTE-NDMM) who are categorized as frail according to the International Myeloma Working Group Frailty Index (IMWG-FI) show pronounced heterogeneity in clinical characteristics, leading to differences in frailty scores—ranging from 2 to 5—based on the type and number of geriatric impairments and comorbidities. As a result, clinical outcomes may differ markedly within this subgroup.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Indeed, a post hoc analysis of the HOVON-123 trial, in which patients were treated with nine cycles of dose-adjusted melphalan, prednisone, and bortezomib, revealed that the overall survival (OS) of frail patients with an IMWG-FI of 2 had an OS comparable to intermediate-fit patients and superior to frail patients with scores of 3–5. In addition, treatment discontinuation after 9 months was considerably higher in patients with higher frailty scores.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Accordingly, in the IFM 2017-03 trial, in which daratumumab–lenalidomide was compared with lenalidomide–dexamethasone, progression free survival (PFS) was significantly prolonged in patients with a frailty score of 2 compared to those with scores of 4–5.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Notably, a similar frailty score may capture distinct aging phenotypes: for example a score of 2 may solely result from advanced age or may reflect significant geriatric impairments in a younger individual. To address this heterogeneity, frail patients may be more rationally stratified based on the underlying drivers of frailty, yielding three frail subgroups: frail-by-age (&gt;80 years, no comorbidities or impairments in [I]ADL), frail-by-impairments (≤80 years, with comorbidities and/or impairments in [I]ADL), and ultra-frail (&gt;80 years, with comorbidities and/or impairments in [I]ADL). The prognostic impact of these three distinct frailty subgroups on OS has been variably reported. In the HOVON-143 trial, in which patients were treated with nine cycles of ixazomib, daratumumab, and dexamethasone (IDd) followed by a maintenance phase of IDd for a maximum of 2 years, patients classified frail-by-age-alone demonstrated superior OS, although the difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to limited sample size.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4, 5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In contrast, a retrospective analysis of the original IMWG-FI patient cohort reported comparable OS between patients classified frail-by-age-alone and all other frail patients.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; To resolve this inconsistency, we examined the impact of frailty subtype on OS in a larger group size by pooling data of two prospective HOVON trials (HOVON-123 and HOVON-143) in NTE-NDMM patients. The studies were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the institutional review board and ethics committees before study initiation. All patients provided written informed consent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The subsets of frail NTE-NDMM patients from the HOVON-12","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70268","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Endothelial dysfunction and proinflammatory state determine severe hematotoxicity and inferior outcome of CAR-T therapy 内皮功能障碍和促炎状态决定了严重的血液毒性和CAR-T治疗的不良结果。
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70267
Lukas Scheller, Xiang Zhou, Henry Loeffler-Wirth, Markus Kreuz, Sofie-Katrin Kadel, Sven Schimanski, Hannah Schulze, Anna Ruckdeschel, Florian Eisele, Verena Konetzki, Maria Jornet Culubret, Maximilian Merz, Julia Mersi, Johannes Waldschmidt, Sophia Danhof, Ulrike Köhl, K. Martin Kortüm, Leo Rasche, Hermann Einsele, Johannes Düll, Max S. Topp, Michael Hudecek, Kristin Reiche, Miriam Alb

Hematotoxicity and infections are the main drivers of non-relapse mortality after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy. Consequently, reliable predictive biomarkers are highly needed to improve risk assessment and optimize patient management. In this study, we applied the immune-related adverse outcome pathway concept to delineate key events and risk factors of CAR-T-associated hematotoxicity. To identify predictive biomarkers, we performed flow cytometry and multiplex assays before and early after CAR-T infusion on 78 patients (ide-cel n = 31; axi-cel n = 24; and cilta-cel n = 23) undergoing CAR-T therapy. Severe hematotoxicity was linked to endothelial dysfunction, as evidenced by reduced levels of ANG1, soluble selectins, and increased soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1) early after CAR-T infusion. Increased sVCAM-1, reflecting endothelial dysfunction, elevated soluble IL-2R (sIL-2R), indicating a proinflammatory state, and high tumor burden before lymphodepletion were key risk factors for CAR-T-associated hematotoxicity. Patients with elevated sVCAM-1 and sIL-2R at baseline (pre-lymphodepletion) exhibited significantly reduced overall survival (OS) (sVCAM-1; P = 0.0009), prolonged Grade 4 neutropenia (sVCAM-1; 12.1 vs. 6.0 days; P = 0.0016), more aplastic neutrophil recovery (5% vs. 30%; P = 0.007), and more severe infections (22.4% vs. 55%; P = 0.011). Baseline sIL-2R and sVCAM-1 demonstrated robust predictive value for prolonged neutropenia, severe infections, and mortality independently of key clinical variables such as the underlying disease and CAR-T product. Integration of these markers improves existing models and can help to refine risk assessment and guide individualized patient management in CAR-T therapy.

血液毒性和感染是嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T治疗后非复发死亡率的主要驱动因素。因此,非常需要可靠的预测性生物标志物来改善风险评估和优化患者管理。在这项研究中,我们应用免疫相关不良结果通路概念来描述car - t相关血液毒性的关键事件和危险因素。为了确定预测性生物标志物,我们对78名接受CAR-T治疗的患者(idel - cell n = 31, axial - cell n = 24, cilta- cell n = 23)在CAR-T输注前后进行了流式细胞术和多重检测。CAR-T输注后早期ANG1、可溶性选择素水平降低和可溶性VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1)升高证明了严重的血液毒性与内皮功能障碍有关。反映内皮功能障碍的sVCAM-1升高、表明促炎状态的可溶性IL-2R (sIL-2R)升高以及淋巴细胞清除前的高肿瘤负荷是car - t相关血液毒性的关键危险因素。基线(淋巴细胞耗损前)sVCAM-1和sIL-2R升高的患者表现出明显降低的总生存期(OS) (sVCAM-1, P = 0.0009),延长的4级中性粒细胞减少(sVCAM-1, 12.1天对6.0天,P = 0.0016),更多的再生中性粒细胞恢复(5%对30%,P = 0.007),更严重的感染(22.4%对55%,P = 0.011)。基线sIL-2R和sVCAM-1对长期中性粒细胞减少症、严重感染和死亡率具有强大的预测价值,与潜在疾病和CAR-T产品等关键临床变量无关。这些标志物的整合改进了现有的模型,可以帮助改进CAR-T治疗中的风险评估和指导个体化患者管理。
{"title":"Endothelial dysfunction and proinflammatory state determine severe hematotoxicity and inferior outcome of CAR-T therapy","authors":"Lukas Scheller,&nbsp;Xiang Zhou,&nbsp;Henry Loeffler-Wirth,&nbsp;Markus Kreuz,&nbsp;Sofie-Katrin Kadel,&nbsp;Sven Schimanski,&nbsp;Hannah Schulze,&nbsp;Anna Ruckdeschel,&nbsp;Florian Eisele,&nbsp;Verena Konetzki,&nbsp;Maria Jornet Culubret,&nbsp;Maximilian Merz,&nbsp;Julia Mersi,&nbsp;Johannes Waldschmidt,&nbsp;Sophia Danhof,&nbsp;Ulrike Köhl,&nbsp;K. Martin Kortüm,&nbsp;Leo Rasche,&nbsp;Hermann Einsele,&nbsp;Johannes Düll,&nbsp;Max S. Topp,&nbsp;Michael Hudecek,&nbsp;Kristin Reiche,&nbsp;Miriam Alb","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70267","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hem3.70267","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hematotoxicity and infections are the main drivers of non-relapse mortality after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy. Consequently, reliable predictive biomarkers are highly needed to improve risk assessment and optimize patient management. In this study, we applied the immune-related adverse outcome pathway concept to delineate key events and risk factors of CAR-T-associated hematotoxicity. To identify predictive biomarkers, we performed flow cytometry and multiplex assays before and early after CAR-T infusion on 78 patients (ide-cel <i>n</i> = 31; axi-cel <i>n</i> = 24; and cilta-cel <i>n</i> = 23) undergoing CAR-T therapy. Severe hematotoxicity was linked to endothelial dysfunction, as evidenced by reduced levels of ANG1, soluble selectins, and increased soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1) early after CAR-T infusion. Increased sVCAM-1, reflecting endothelial dysfunction, elevated soluble IL-2R (sIL-2R), indicating a proinflammatory state, and high tumor burden before lymphodepletion were key risk factors for CAR-T-associated hematotoxicity. Patients with elevated sVCAM-1 and sIL-2R at baseline (pre-lymphodepletion) exhibited significantly reduced overall survival (OS) (sVCAM-1; P = 0.0009), prolonged Grade 4 neutropenia (sVCAM-1; 12.1 vs. 6.0 days; P = 0.0016), more aplastic neutrophil recovery (5% vs. 30%; P = 0.007), and more severe infections (22.4% vs. 55%; P = 0.011). Baseline sIL-2R and sVCAM-1 demonstrated robust predictive value for prolonged neutropenia, severe infections, and mortality independently of key clinical variables such as the underlying disease and CAR-T product. Integration of these markers improves existing models and can help to refine risk assessment and guide individualized patient management in CAR-T therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12684805/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Functional differences between CLL- and ALL-derived CAR T cells in a 3D tumor microenvironment highlight CXCR4 and IL-10 as potential modulatory targets CLL-和all来源的CAR - T细胞在三维肿瘤微环境中的功能差异突出了CXCR4和IL-10作为潜在的调节靶点。
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70279
Janin Dingfelder, Michael Aigner, Jana Lindacher, Pascal Lukas, Cindy Flamann, Gina Nusser, Katharina Zimmermann, Axel Schambach, Frederik Graw, Simon Völkl, Heiko Bruns, Manuela Krumbholz, Martina Haibach, Jochen Wilke, Andreas Mackensen, Gloria Lutzny-Geier

Despite advances in targeted therapies, treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains challenging, highlighting the urgent need for effective new therapeutic strategies. Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy dramatically improved outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), its efficacy in CLL is limited. We hypothesize that this disparity results from pronounced CAR T-cell exhaustion and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in CLL. We utilized an autologous 3D TME co-culture model to investigate the functionality of CAR T cells derived from CLL and ALL patients within physiologically relevant conditions. Our results revealed increased exhaustion levels and diminished cytotoxicity of CAR T cells from CLL patients compared to those from ALL patients. Importantly, combining CAR T-cell treatment with interleukin-10 (IL-10) or CXCR4 blockade effectively improved cytotoxicity against CLL cells, even in stromal-protected regions within the 3D model. These findings offer insights into CAR T-cell dysfunction in CLL and support novel TME-targeted combination strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

尽管靶向治疗取得了进展,但慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)的治疗仍然具有挑战性,迫切需要有效的新治疗策略。尽管嵌合抗原受体(CAR) t细胞疗法显著改善了急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的预后,但其对慢性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效有限。我们假设这种差异是由CLL中明显的CAR - t细胞衰竭和免疫抑制肿瘤微环境(TME)造成的。我们利用自体3D TME共培养模型来研究来自CLL和ALL患者的CAR - T细胞在生理相关条件下的功能。我们的研究结果显示,与ALL患者相比,CLL患者的衰竭水平增加,CAR - T细胞毒性降低。重要的是,将CAR - t细胞治疗与白细胞介素-10 (IL-10)或CXCR4阻断相结合,有效地提高了对CLL细胞的细胞毒性,即使在3D模型中的基质保护区域也是如此。这些发现为CLL中的CAR -t细胞功能障碍提供了新的见解,并支持新的靶向tme的联合策略来改善临床结果。
{"title":"Functional differences between CLL- and ALL-derived CAR T cells in a 3D tumor microenvironment highlight CXCR4 and IL-10 as potential modulatory targets","authors":"Janin Dingfelder,&nbsp;Michael Aigner,&nbsp;Jana Lindacher,&nbsp;Pascal Lukas,&nbsp;Cindy Flamann,&nbsp;Gina Nusser,&nbsp;Katharina Zimmermann,&nbsp;Axel Schambach,&nbsp;Frederik Graw,&nbsp;Simon Völkl,&nbsp;Heiko Bruns,&nbsp;Manuela Krumbholz,&nbsp;Martina Haibach,&nbsp;Jochen Wilke,&nbsp;Andreas Mackensen,&nbsp;Gloria Lutzny-Geier","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70279","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hem3.70279","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite advances in targeted therapies, treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains challenging, highlighting the urgent need for effective new therapeutic strategies. Although chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy dramatically improved outcomes in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), its efficacy in CLL is limited. We hypothesize that this disparity results from pronounced CAR T-cell exhaustion and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in CLL. We utilized an autologous 3D TME co-culture model to investigate the functionality of CAR T cells derived from CLL and ALL patients within physiologically relevant conditions. Our results revealed increased exhaustion levels and diminished cytotoxicity of CAR T cells from CLL patients compared to those from ALL patients. Importantly, combining CAR T-cell treatment with interleukin-10 (IL-10) or CXCR4 blockade effectively improved cytotoxicity against CLL cells, even in stromal-protected regions within the 3D model. These findings offer insights into CAR T-cell dysfunction in CLL and support novel TME-targeted combination strategies to improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12683941/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma after CAR-T cell therapy failure: A DESCAR-T analysis CAR-T细胞治疗失败后原发性纵隔b细胞淋巴瘤患者的预后和治疗模式:一项DESCAR-T分析
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70263
Jean Galtier, Pierre Sesques, Vivien Dupont, Emmanuel Bachy, Roberta Di Blasi, Catherine Thieblemont, Gabriel Brisou, Thomas Gastinne, Guillaume Cartron, François-Xavier Gros, Franck Morschhauser, Axel André, Jacques-Olivier Bay, Magalie Joris, Aline Tanguy-Schmidt, Audrey Demailly, Steven Le Gouill, Roch Houot, Krimo Bouabdallah, Vincent Camus
<p>Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare subset of aggressive lymphoma with excellent outcome after dose-dense frontline immunochemotherapy but a historically dismal prognosis at relapse.<span><sup>1-4</sup></span> Leveraging data from the nation-wide prospective DESCAR-T registry, in which all patients who received commercial CAR-T cells in France as a treatment for a hematologic malignancy were included, we recently showed that relapsed or refractory (R/R) PMBL receiving anti-CD19 CAR-T cell infusion exhibited a high complete response (CR) rate and satisfactory survivals.<span><sup>5</sup></span> This was particularly meaningful for the 62 patients treated with axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel), for whom 2 years progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rate reached 70.4% and 86.9%, respectively, and compared favorably with more than 1000 other patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving the same treatment. These data, along with other evidence,<span><sup>6-8</sup></span> strongly support anti-CD19 CAR-T cells as current standard-of-care for R/R PMBL. However, PMBL patients experiencing CAR-T cells therapy failure still represent an unmet clinical need and their outcomes have not been described so far. Albeit a previous work from DESCAR-T registry did describe the very poor OS of patients with DLBCL progressing after CAR-T cell therapy,<span><sup>9</sup></span> recent changes in the treatment paradigm of R/R PMBL could translate into unexpected outcomes even in very advanced lines and their clinical course need to be specifically studied. Notably, anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) demonstrated promising efficacy in heavily pre-treated PMBL, and association with brentuximab-vedotin (Bv) may even increase response rate and survivals.<span><sup>10-13</sup></span></p><p>To address this question, we analyzed the clinical course of patients experiencing treatment failure in the CARTHYM study, whose procedures have been previously described.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Briefly, it leveraged the data of all adults patients with a diagnosis of PMBL confirmed by an expert hematopathologist from the LYMPHOPATH network<span><sup>14</sup></span> who received an anti-CD19 CAR-T cell infusion in France within the prospective DESCAR-T registry (NCT04328298), between January 2018 and February 2024. All patients provided written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committees of each participating center. The CARTHYM study included 82 patients with R/R PMBL treated across 21 centers: 62 received axi-cel, 14 received tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and 6 received lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 27 progression events were observed. These 27 patients, treated across 13 different centers, constitute the study population analyzed in the present report.</p><p>Characteristics of the 27 patient
原发性纵隔b细胞淋巴瘤(PMBL)是一种罕见的侵袭性淋巴瘤,在高剂量一线免疫化疗后预后良好,但复发时预后较差。1-4利用全国范围内前瞻性DESCAR-T登记的数据,其中包括法国所有接受商业化CAR-T细胞治疗血液恶性肿瘤的患者,我们最近发现接受抗cd19 CAR-T细胞输注的复发或难治性PMBL表现出高的完全缓解(CR)率和令人满意的生存率这对于接受axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel)治疗的62例患者尤其有意义,他们的2年无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS)分别达到70.4%和86.9%,并且与接受相同治疗的1000多例R/R弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者相比具有优势。这些数据,连同其他证据,6-8强烈支持抗cd19 CAR-T细胞作为目前治疗R/R PMBL的标准疗法。然而,经历CAR-T细胞治疗失败的PMBL患者仍然代表着未满足的临床需求,其结果迄今尚未描述。尽管DESCAR-T登记处的先前工作确实描述了CAR-T细胞治疗后DLBCL进展的患者的OS非常差,但最近R/R PMBL治疗模式的变化可能转化为意想不到的结果,即使在非常先进的系中,其临床过程也需要专门研究。值得注意的是,抗pd1检查点抑制剂(CPI)在重度预处理的PMBL中显示出有希望的疗效,并且与brentuximab-vedotin (Bv)联合使用甚至可能增加缓解率和生存率。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了CARTHYM研究中经历治疗失败的患者的临床过程,这些患者的治疗过程之前已经描述过简而言之,该研究利用了2018年1月至2024年2月期间在法国前瞻性DESCAR-T注册(NCT04328298)中接受抗cd19 CAR-T细胞输注的所有成年PMBL患者的数据,这些患者被淋巴系统网络的血液病理学专家证实。所有患者均提供书面知情同意书。本研究按照《赫尔辛基宣言》进行,并得到各参与中心当地伦理委员会的批准。CARTHYM研究纳入了在21个中心治疗的82例R/R PMBL患者:62例接受轴细胞治疗,14例接受tisagenlecleucel(组织细胞)治疗,6例接受异cabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel)治疗。中位随访21个月后,观察到27例进展事件。这27名患者在13个不同的中心接受治疗,构成了本报告分析的研究人群。27例患者的特征见表1。14例(52%)患者在疾病进展前接受了轴细胞治疗,11例(40%)接受了组织细胞治疗,2例(7%)接受了liso- cell治疗。CAR-T细胞输注的中位年龄为33岁,性别比(M/F)为1.1。12名患者(44%)在2021年之前接受治疗,15名患者(56%)在2021年至2024年期间接受治疗。从CAR-T细胞输注到疾病进展的中位时间为2个月(范围0-5)。10例(37%)患者在30(±5)天内出现进展,14例(52%)患者在1 - 3个月内出现进展,3例(11%)患者在3个月后出现进展。6个月后无复发。在复发时,16例患者(59%)已进入晚期疾病(Ann Arbor III-IV期),17例患者(74%)LDH水平升高。12例(44%)患者复发时行活检。病理结果显示,12例患者中有7例复发为PMBL, 1例为DLBCL, 2例为灰色地带淋巴瘤(特征介于DLBCL和霍奇金淋巴瘤之间)。值得注意的是,对于这3个病例中的每一个,诊断和复发活检都是由同一位血液病理学专家审查的。2例表现为肿瘤坏死。8例中CD19阳性7例,11例中CD20阳性10例,3例中PDL1阳性3例。在CAR-T细胞治疗后疾病进展时,中位随访时间为34个月(6−71),整个队列的1年(1 y) OS为48.1%,中位OS为11.7个月(图1A)。OS不受进展时代的影响(支持信息S1:图1)。总体而言,22名(82%)患者在CAR-T细胞失败后接受了后续治疗,而5名(18%)患者经历了快速的临床恶化并在进一步治疗前死亡。值得注意的是,12例出现非常早期进展的患者中有8例接受了后续治疗,而15例患者中有14例在输注后超过一个月复发。 这些治疗方法分类如下:11例患者以cpi为基础(派姆单抗或纳武单抗),其中4例与Bv相关;1例患者以化疗为基础(利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀+ polatuzumab-vedotin);6例患者出现抗cd3 /CD20双特异性抗体(glofitamab, epcoritamab或plamotamab);其他4例(bv -来那度胺1例,利妥昔单抗-来那度胺1例,单独放疗2例)。5例患者单独放疗(2例)或合并放疗(3例)。2例患者接受了巩固性大剂量化疗后自体干细胞移植,1例患者接受了巩固性异体干细胞移植,3例患者均处于CR期。挽救性治疗后,22例患者中有9例患者(41%)完全缓解(CR), 1例患者(5%)部分缓解(PR), 12例患者(55%)无缓解,即病情稳定或进展。接受cpi方案治疗的11例患者中有7例达到CR,接受双特异性抗体治疗的6例患者中有1例达到CR,接受Bv +来那度胺治疗的1例患者随后接受ASCT。支持信息S1:图2显示了22名CAR-T细胞失败后接受治疗的患者的游泳图。值得注意的是,一名GZL未能获得双特异性抗体,但随后在接受CPI治疗后获得了持续缓解,而唯一一名双特异性抗体获得CR的患者是在进展时诊断为DLBCL的患者。治疗患者1年PFS和OS分别为40.9%和59.1%(图1B,C)。接受以cpi为基础的挽救性治疗并达到CR的7例患者在2年时存活且无进展。CPI方案和非CPI方案治疗的患者一年PFS分别为63.6%和18.2%(图1D)。其临床特征见支持信息S1:表1。这项研究首次解决了CAR-T细胞治疗后R/R PMBL出现失败的具体结果。它展示了三个对日常实践具有临床意义的主要发现。首先,CAR-T细胞输注后的进展,当发生时,是非常早期的不良预后事件(89%在3个月内发生,100%在6个月内发生,从输注开始的中位时间为2个月,而dlbcl患者的中位时间约为3个月)。尽管年龄很小,但近20%的患者在没有接受任何后续治疗的情况下死亡,这突出了输液后非常密切的随访和复发时非常迅速的行动的迫切需要。另一方面,我们之前的研究表明,M + 1评价的残留疾病(特别是多维尔评分4)可能不会影响结果因此,临床医生在输液后的头几个月的关键时期可能面临快速决策的有效问题。其次,复发时组织学的明显演变可能具有重要的治疗意义,因为12例活检患者中有3例显示了世卫组织定义的其他诊断,即DLBCL和灰色地带淋巴瘤。需要强调的是,这些实体通常表现出与PMBL相近的组织学特征,从而可能导致错误的初步诊断,或者复发时PMBL的严格诊断可能受到多发性进展后表面标记物/肿瘤微环境改变的阻碍。然而,这一观察结果提出了严重的治疗挑战,因为具有明显DLBCL组织学的患者应该合理地接受双特异性抗体治疗(CAR-T细胞失败后的标准治疗方法),而PMBL甚至GZL20更有可能从基于cpi的治疗中获益(见下文)。这些数据支持在可能的情况下进行新的组织学检查,以及血液病专家的建议。第三,CAR-T细胞失败后适合接受后续治疗的一部分患者表现出罕见的良好结果,似乎消除了输注
{"title":"Outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma after CAR-T cell therapy failure: A DESCAR-T analysis","authors":"Jean Galtier,&nbsp;Pierre Sesques,&nbsp;Vivien Dupont,&nbsp;Emmanuel Bachy,&nbsp;Roberta Di Blasi,&nbsp;Catherine Thieblemont,&nbsp;Gabriel Brisou,&nbsp;Thomas Gastinne,&nbsp;Guillaume Cartron,&nbsp;François-Xavier Gros,&nbsp;Franck Morschhauser,&nbsp;Axel André,&nbsp;Jacques-Olivier Bay,&nbsp;Magalie Joris,&nbsp;Aline Tanguy-Schmidt,&nbsp;Audrey Demailly,&nbsp;Steven Le Gouill,&nbsp;Roch Houot,&nbsp;Krimo Bouabdallah,&nbsp;Vincent Camus","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70263","DOIUrl":"10.1002/hem3.70263","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare subset of aggressive lymphoma with excellent outcome after dose-dense frontline immunochemotherapy but a historically dismal prognosis at relapse.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1-4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Leveraging data from the nation-wide prospective DESCAR-T registry, in which all patients who received commercial CAR-T cells in France as a treatment for a hematologic malignancy were included, we recently showed that relapsed or refractory (R/R) PMBL receiving anti-CD19 CAR-T cell infusion exhibited a high complete response (CR) rate and satisfactory survivals.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This was particularly meaningful for the 62 patients treated with axicabtagene-ciloleucel (axi-cel), for whom 2 years progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rate reached 70.4% and 86.9%, respectively, and compared favorably with more than 1000 other patients with R/R diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving the same treatment. These data, along with other evidence,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6-8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; strongly support anti-CD19 CAR-T cells as current standard-of-care for R/R PMBL. However, PMBL patients experiencing CAR-T cells therapy failure still represent an unmet clinical need and their outcomes have not been described so far. Albeit a previous work from DESCAR-T registry did describe the very poor OS of patients with DLBCL progressing after CAR-T cell therapy,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; recent changes in the treatment paradigm of R/R PMBL could translate into unexpected outcomes even in very advanced lines and their clinical course need to be specifically studied. Notably, anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) demonstrated promising efficacy in heavily pre-treated PMBL, and association with brentuximab-vedotin (Bv) may even increase response rate and survivals.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;10-13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To address this question, we analyzed the clinical course of patients experiencing treatment failure in the CARTHYM study, whose procedures have been previously described.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Briefly, it leveraged the data of all adults patients with a diagnosis of PMBL confirmed by an expert hematopathologist from the LYMPHOPATH network&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; who received an anti-CD19 CAR-T cell infusion in France within the prospective DESCAR-T registry (NCT04328298), between January 2018 and February 2024. All patients provided written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committees of each participating center. The CARTHYM study included 82 patients with R/R PMBL treated across 21 centers: 62 received axi-cel, 14 received tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and 6 received lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel). After a median follow-up of 21 months, 27 progression events were observed. These 27 patients, treated across 13 different centers, constitute the study population analyzed in the present report.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Characteristics of the 27 patient","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12683939/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714115","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of time to first progression and fitness status in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma: Results from the ELDERLY MANTLE-FIRST study 时间对老年套细胞淋巴瘤患者首次进展和健康状况的影响:来自老年mantle - first研究的结果
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70254
Francesca Maria Quaglia, Annalisa Arcari, Lucia Morello, Luigi Marcheselli, Alessandra Tucci, Chiara Pagani, Valentina Bozzoli, Greta Scapinello, Francesco Piazza, Vittorio Ruggero Zilioli, Cristina Muzi, Benedetta Puccini, Benedetta Sordi, Maria Chiara Tisi, Nicolò Rampi, Alessia Castellino, Sara Veronica Usai, Jari Paternoster, Emanuele Cencini, Simone Ferrero, Chiara Consoli, Marco Basso, Elisa Lucchini, Elsa Pennese, Maria Elena Nizzoli, Michele Spina, Luca Pezzullo, Maria Stella De Candia, Rita Tavarozzi, Mauro Krampera, Carlo Visco
<p>Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive and incurable disease.<span><sup>1, 2</sup></span> Most patients are over 65 years old and exhibit heterogeneous fitness status alongside multiple comorbidities. Until now, conventional chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) followed by rituximab maintenance has represented the standard approach for elderly patients.<span><sup>3</sup></span> Approximately 40% of MCL patients experience disease relapse or progression (POD) within 24 months from diagnosis and have been defined as early-POD.<span><sup>4</sup></span> The MANTLE-FIRST study has divided patients' outcome depending on time to first relapse (early- vs. late-POD) after intensive upfront therapy including high-dose cytarabine.<span><sup>5, 6</sup></span> However, the predictive significance of early-POD in elderly MCL patients following less intensive frontline treatment is not well established. Recent studies have addressed this topic, but only as pooled analysis from clinical trials or retrospective series including also young patients.<span><sup>7-9</sup></span></p><p>In our retrospective real-life study, we evaluated the prognostic significance of early-POD specifically among relapsed/refractory (r/r) MCL patients ≥ 65 years old. We evaluated progression-free survival and overall survival, estimated from the start of salvage therapy (PFS-2, OS-2) in the whole cohort and according to different second-line treatments. We also evaluated PFS-2 and OS-2 in relation to a simplified geriatric assessment (sGA) tool, uniformly assessed in all participating Centers (Table S1).<span><sup>10</sup></span> Patient selection/statistics/ethics are reported in the Supporting Information.</p><p>We included 231 patients ≥65 years old with r/r disease after rituximab-based non-intensive induction regimens, who were treated at relapse with at least one cycle of systemic therapy (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor [BTKi] vs. CIT vs. other) between 2007 and 2021 in 21 centers belonging to the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) (Table S2). Overall, 121 patients (53%) were defined as early-POD. Patients with older age at diagnosis, male sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) > 1, high lactate dehydrogenase and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI), Ki67 > 30%, and nonclassical histology were more represented in the early-POD subgroup (Table S3). Frontline treatments included rituximab–bendamustine (RB = 102 patients, 45%), rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine (R-BAC = 67 patients, 29%), and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like = 60 patients, 26%). Patients treated with RB were older compared to R-BAC and R-CHOP, with a worse fitness profile. We showed more interruptions/dose reductions during R-BAC, with a higher incidence of hematological adverse events (AEs) (Table S4). Table S5 describes the impact of patients' characteristics/type of first-line treatment on time
套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)是一种侵袭性且无法治愈的疾病。1,2大多数患者年龄超过65岁,表现出不同的健康状况,并伴有多种合并症。到目前为止,传统的化疗免疫治疗(CIT)加美罗华维持是老年患者的标准治疗方法大约40%的MCL患者在诊断后24个月内出现疾病复发或进展(POD),并被定义为早期PODMANTLE-FIRST研究根据患者在接受包括高剂量阿糖胞苷在内的强化前期治疗后首次复发的时间(早期与晚期pod)对结果进行了划分。5,6然而,早期pod在低强度一线治疗的老年MCL患者中的预测意义尚不明确。最近的研究已经解决了这个问题,但只是作为临床试验或回顾性系列的汇总分析,其中也包括年轻患者。在我们的回顾性现实研究中,我们评估了早期pod在≥65岁的复发/难治性(r/r) MCL患者中的预后意义。我们评估了无进展生存期和总生存期,从整个队列的挽救治疗开始(PFS-2, OS-2)估计,并根据不同的二线治疗。我们还评估了PFS-2和OS-2与简化老年评估(sGA)工具的关系,在所有参与中心进行统一评估(表S1) 10患者选择/统计/伦理在辅助信息中报告。我们纳入了231例≥65岁的r/r疾病患者,他们接受了基于利妥昔单抗的非强化诱导方案,这些患者在2007年至2021年间复发时接受了至少一个周期的全身治疗(布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂[BTKi]与CIT与其他),这些患者属于意大利林福米基金会(FIL)的21个中心(表S2)。总体而言,121例(53%)患者被定义为早期pod。诊断时年龄较大、性别为男性、Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) &gt; 1、高乳酸脱氢酶和套细胞淋巴瘤国际预后指数(MIPI)、Ki67 &gt; 30%、非经典组织学在早期pod亚组中更有代表性(表S3)。一线治疗包括利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀(RB = 102例,45%),利妥昔单抗-苯达莫司汀-阿糖胞苷(R-BAC = 67例,29%),利妥昔单抗-环磷酰胺-阿霉素-长春新碱-泼尼松(R-CHOP/R-CHOP样= 60例,26%)。与R-BAC和R-CHOP相比,接受RB治疗的患者年龄更大,健康状况更差。我们发现在R-BAC期间有更多的中断/剂量减少,血液不良事件(ae)的发生率更高(表S4)。表S5描述了患者特征/一线治疗类型对POD时间的影响,突出了年龄、ECOG PS &gt; 1和Ki67 &gt; 30%的相关性。然后我们关注不同二线药物的安全性和有效性。患者复发时的特征(n = 223)见表1。总体而言,124名患者(56%)接受了BTKi治疗(122名依鲁替尼,1名扎鲁替尼和1名阿卡拉布替尼)。BTKi治疗的患者比补救性CIT治疗的患者年龄大(中位年龄77比75,p值= 0.026,40%≥80岁),超过50%的患者不健康/虚弱。其余临床特征分布均匀。BTKi血液学毒性较小,但血液学外ae略高。心脏毒性在BTKi亚组中更为常见(4例心房颤动,2例心力衰竭,1例急性心肌缺血)。在90例停止使用BTKi的患者中,61例(68%)的原因是进展,9例(10%)的原因是不耐受,20例(22%)的原因是其他原因(n = 16未知,n = 3继发性肿瘤,n = 1异基因移植桥)。PFS-2和OS-2见图S1。中位随访4.6年,中位PFS-2为1.0年(95% CI 0.76-1.3),中位OS-2为2.2年(95% CI 1.6-2.6)。死亡原因为106例进展(69%,n = 1例中枢神经系统),12例感染(8%),6例继发性癌症(4%),4例心力衰竭(3%),1例肾衰竭,23例未知(15%)。不同二线处理的PFS-2和OS-2如图1A、B所示。接受BTKi治疗的患者中位PFS-2为1.39年,3年PFS-2 (3y-PFS-2)为24%,而接受CIT治疗的患者中位PFS-2为0.98年,3y-PFS-2为11%(风险比[HR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.02-2.00, p值= 0.037)。通过MIPI和早期pod等混杂因素调整二线治疗的Cox回归结果如表S6所示,证实了BTKi对PFS-2的独立有利影响。在OS-2方面,BTKi没有显示出显著优势(OS-2中位数为2.10年,3年OS-2 [3y-OS-2]为36%,而CIT的OS-2中位数为3.16年,3y-OS-2为53%;HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.57-1.20, p值= 0.314)。 然后,我们评估到POD的时间对生存结果的作用(图1C,D)。早期pod患者的中位PFS-2为0.66年,晚期pod患者的中位PFS-2为1.47年(HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.01, p值= 0.008)。早期pod的中位OS-2为1.44年,晚期pod的中位OS-2为3.17年(HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.12-2.15, p值= 0.009)。众所周知的预后因素如ECOG PS、MIPI和中枢神经系统受累证实了它们在复发中的作用(表S7和S8)。不适合/虚弱的患者表现出明显更差的结果,中位PFS-2为0.76年(95% CI 0.41-1.16),而适合患者的中位PFS-2为1.16年(95% CI 0.92-1.95)。3y-PFS-2在不适合/虚弱患者中为11% (95% CI 5-20),而在适合患者中为32% (95% CI 22-42) (p值= 0.007)。3y-OS-2为26% (95% CI 17-36),而拟合病例为47% (95% CI 35-57) (p值= 0.003)(图1E,F)。最后,我们考虑了sGA与POD时间之间的相互作用,以3y-PFS-2和3y-OS-2评估不同亚组的结果。晚期复发的Fit患者(Fit- late亚组)在PFS-2和OS-2方面预后最好(分别为34%和62%)。在不健康/虚弱的患者中,无论POD时间如何,3y-PFS-2和OS-2非常相似(表S9)。在多变量分析中,二线治疗CIT(与BTKi相比)、不健康/虚弱状态(pod早期和晚期)、高MIPI和复发时的中枢神经系统疾病与更差的PFS-2相关(表S10)。就OS-2而言,适合的早期pod患者和不适合/虚弱的患者(包括早期和晚期pod),以及高MIPI和CNS复发,证实了它们的独立预后意义。在多变量分析中,BTKi治疗与PFS-2改善相关,但与OS-2无关。图S2显示了通过多重Cox回归预测的PFS-2和OS-2,校正了sGA-POD、MIPI和复发时中枢神经系统疾病。144例接受二线治疗的r/r患者仅获得OS数据。中位OS-3(第二次复发后的总生存期)为6.4个月(95% CI 4.4-10.4)。35例患者接受BTKi作为三线治疗,仅有6例患者在既往BTKi治疗后再次接受治疗,而23例和9例患者曾接受CIT或其他方案治疗。如图S3所示,在不同既往治疗后接受BTKi作为三线治疗的患者预后较差(中位OS-3为20个月)。在我们的研究中,嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T细胞)和匹托鲁替尼在意大利还不能用于r/r m
{"title":"The role of time to first progression and fitness status in elderly patients with mantle cell lymphoma: Results from the ELDERLY MANTLE-FIRST study","authors":"Francesca Maria Quaglia,&nbsp;Annalisa Arcari,&nbsp;Lucia Morello,&nbsp;Luigi Marcheselli,&nbsp;Alessandra Tucci,&nbsp;Chiara Pagani,&nbsp;Valentina Bozzoli,&nbsp;Greta Scapinello,&nbsp;Francesco Piazza,&nbsp;Vittorio Ruggero Zilioli,&nbsp;Cristina Muzi,&nbsp;Benedetta Puccini,&nbsp;Benedetta Sordi,&nbsp;Maria Chiara Tisi,&nbsp;Nicolò Rampi,&nbsp;Alessia Castellino,&nbsp;Sara Veronica Usai,&nbsp;Jari Paternoster,&nbsp;Emanuele Cencini,&nbsp;Simone Ferrero,&nbsp;Chiara Consoli,&nbsp;Marco Basso,&nbsp;Elisa Lucchini,&nbsp;Elsa Pennese,&nbsp;Maria Elena Nizzoli,&nbsp;Michele Spina,&nbsp;Luca Pezzullo,&nbsp;Maria Stella De Candia,&nbsp;Rita Tavarozzi,&nbsp;Mauro Krampera,&nbsp;Carlo Visco","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70254","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70254","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive and incurable disease.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1, 2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Most patients are over 65 years old and exhibit heterogeneous fitness status alongside multiple comorbidities. Until now, conventional chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) followed by rituximab maintenance has represented the standard approach for elderly patients.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Approximately 40% of MCL patients experience disease relapse or progression (POD) within 24 months from diagnosis and have been defined as early-POD.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The MANTLE-FIRST study has divided patients' outcome depending on time to first relapse (early- vs. late-POD) after intensive upfront therapy including high-dose cytarabine.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5, 6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; However, the predictive significance of early-POD in elderly MCL patients following less intensive frontline treatment is not well established. Recent studies have addressed this topic, but only as pooled analysis from clinical trials or retrospective series including also young patients.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7-9&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In our retrospective real-life study, we evaluated the prognostic significance of early-POD specifically among relapsed/refractory (r/r) MCL patients ≥ 65 years old. We evaluated progression-free survival and overall survival, estimated from the start of salvage therapy (PFS-2, OS-2) in the whole cohort and according to different second-line treatments. We also evaluated PFS-2 and OS-2 in relation to a simplified geriatric assessment (sGA) tool, uniformly assessed in all participating Centers (Table S1).&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;10&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Patient selection/statistics/ethics are reported in the Supporting Information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We included 231 patients ≥65 years old with r/r disease after rituximab-based non-intensive induction regimens, who were treated at relapse with at least one cycle of systemic therapy (Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor [BTKi] vs. CIT vs. other) between 2007 and 2021 in 21 centers belonging to the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) (Table S2). Overall, 121 patients (53%) were defined as early-POD. Patients with older age at diagnosis, male sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) &gt; 1, high lactate dehydrogenase and mantle cell lymphoma international prognostic index (MIPI), Ki67 &gt; 30%, and nonclassical histology were more represented in the early-POD subgroup (Table S3). Frontline treatments included rituximab–bendamustine (RB = 102 patients, 45%), rituximab, bendamustine, and cytarabine (R-BAC = 67 patients, 29%), and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like = 60 patients, 26%). Patients treated with RB were older compared to R-BAC and R-CHOP, with a worse fitness profile. We showed more interruptions/dose reductions during R-BAC, with a higher incidence of hematological adverse events (AEs) (Table S4). Table S5 describes the impact of patients' characteristics/type of first-line treatment on time ","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70254","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
HELIOS Action: Advancing research, education, and equity in hemoglobinopathies across Europe and beyond HELIOS行动:在欧洲及其他地区推进血红蛋白病的研究、教育和公平
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70258
Sotiroula Chatzimatthaiou, Fedele Bonifazi, Anna C. Gimbert, Raffaella Colombatti, Francesco Cremonesi, Andreas Glenthøj, Elisabetta Mezzalira, Coralea Stephanou, Jan Traeger-Synodinos, Darko Antic, Burak Durmaz, Eleni Gavriilaki, Baba Inusa, Annalisa Landi, Mariangela Pellegrini, Francesca Basile, Stephanie Muth, Holger Cario, Eleni Katsantoni, Dilem Ruhluel, Carsten Werner Lederer, María del Mar Mañú-Pereira, Petros Kountouris
<p>Recent decades have witnessed remarkable advances in hematology research,<span><sup>1</sup></span> and yet, for many affected populations, particularly those with sickle cell disease (SCD) and Thalassemia, more so in low-resource settings, clinical outcomes remain suboptimal.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Despite being among the most common inherited disorders globally, with an estimated 330,000 conceptions annually,<span><sup>3</sup></span> patients with hemoglobinopathies encounter fragmented care systems and unequal access to diagnosis and treatment, and there is limited coordination in research and clinical practices across countries.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>Although hemoglobinopathies have gained recognition as a global public health concern,<span><sup>3</sup></span> there are still four persistent challenges. First, there are only a limited number of harmonized, multicentric studies that capture the genetic and clinical variability of these disorders to enable personalized approaches in clinical management and treatment.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Second, care standards for hemoglobinopathies remain inconsistent, with substantial gaps between and within countries.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Third, there is limited access to structured training and clinical education, particularly in countries with underdeveloped health systems.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Finally, a fragmented research landscape has impeded the development of innovative, cross-border strategies that could guide policy and practice.<span><sup>8</sup></span> These limitations are compounded by poor coordination globally, restricting the sharing of knowledge and the development of common standards.</p><p>The HELIOS Action (Haemoglobinopathies in European Liaison of Medicine and Science, www.heliosaction.eu) was launched in 2023 to address these persistent gaps, through networking and training activities. Funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), HELIOS is a collaborative open network designed to strengthen research infrastructure, standardize care practices, and promote inclusive participation in hemoglobinopathy-related science and policy. HELIOS thus provides a coordinated and inclusive platform and facilitates concerted action to tackle major challenges in hemoglobinopathies. Specifically, HELIOS fosters multicentric collaboration and genetic mapping to address the lack of harmonized research, develops regionally adapted clinical protocols to reduce inconsistent standards, expands structured training programs to close education gaps, and strengthens international data sharing and policy engagement to overcome fragmentation. To date, the Action involves over 245 members from 36 countries (Figure 1), and continues to grow, with participants spanning Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, and Australia, reflecting the global relevance of these disorders.</p><p>A key strength of the HELIOS Action lies in its inclusive and collaborative structure. As a glo
近几十年来,血液学研究取得了显著进展1,然而,对于许多受影响的人群,特别是镰状细胞病(SCD)和地中海贫血患者,尤其是在资源匮乏的环境中,临床结果仍然不理想2尽管血红蛋白病是全球最常见的遗传性疾病之一,每年估计有33万例妊娠,但血红蛋白病患者面临着支离破碎的护理系统和不平等的诊断和治疗机会,而且各国在研究和临床实践方面的协调有限。4虽然血红蛋白病已被公认为是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,3但仍存在四个持续的挑战。首先,只有数量有限的协调的、多中心的研究能够捕捉到这些疾病的遗传和临床变异性,从而使临床管理和治疗的个性化方法成为可能其次,血红蛋白病的护理标准仍然不一致,国家之间和国家内部存在巨大差距第三,获得有组织的培训和临床教育的机会有限,特别是在卫生系统不发达的国家最后,支离破碎的研究格局阻碍了能够指导政策和实践的创新、跨界战略的发展这些限制加上全球协调不力,限制了知识的分享和共同标准的制定。HELIOS行动(欧洲医学和科学联络中的血红蛋白病,www.heliosaction.eu)于2023年启动,旨在通过网络和培训活动解决这些持续存在的差距。HELIOS由欧洲科学技术合作组织(COST)资助,是一个协作开放网络,旨在加强研究基础设施,规范护理实践,促进血红蛋白病相关科学和政策的包容性参与。因此,HELIOS提供了一个协调和包容的平台,并促进协调行动,以应对血红蛋白病的重大挑战。具体而言,HELIOS促进多中心合作和基因定位,以解决缺乏统一研究的问题;制定适合地区的临床方案,以减少标准不一致的情况;扩大有组织的培训项目,以缩小教育差距;加强国际数据共享和政策参与,以克服碎片化问题。迄今为止,该行动涉及来自36个国家的245多名成员(图1),并在继续增长,参与者遍及欧洲、非洲、亚洲、北美和澳大利亚,反映了这些疾病的全球相关性。HELIOS行动的一个关键优势在于其包容和协作的结构。作为一个全球合作项目,HELIOS促进了数据标准化、培训、政策参与和知识传播,同时通过其网络活动实现了血红蛋白病的大规模跨境研究。会员资格向所有对该领域感兴趣的个人开放,无论其专业水平如何。这种包容性的方法促进了一种相互学习的模式,参与者作为培训师、学员或两者兼而有之。HELIOS的核心目标是通过数十年成功的筛查、预防和临床管理举措,有组织地转移专业知识。定期工作组会议、年度大会和利益相关者参与活动确保了整个网络的协调行动、广泛参与和持续势头。到目前为止,在其245名成员中,约57%是女性,47%是年轻的研究人员和创新者(YRIs,即成本协会定义的40岁),53%是高级专家,58%来自成本指定的包容性目标国家(ITCs)。在COST的背景下,itc是指参与欧盟研究项目较少的国家,旨在促进欧洲研究的地域平衡和包容性。通过HELIOS和其他资助行动,成本通过提供专门的资助机会和鼓励参与其开放的跨学科研究网络来支持ITC的参与。重要的是,HELIOS还设立了三个额外的领导角色:道德、性别平等、多样性协调员、患者联络协调员和YRIs协调员,以确保代表性不足的群体公平获得领导、网络和教育机会。这种对多样性的承诺强化了HELIOS在血红蛋白病领域建立全球包容性研究网络的愿景,不让任何地区或社会群体掉队。HELIOS在最初的两年期间通过实施各种培训和知识交流举措,优先考虑能力建设。这些教育活动吸引了超过753名参与者,其中包括约57%的女性、46%的青年青年和48%的跨国公司参与者。 具体的培训项目包括:网络研讨会也可以在HELIOS YouTube频道(http://www.youtube.com/@heliosaction).HELIOS)上点播,为成员提供资金支持,以参加高级别国际会议和参与短期科学任务(STSMs),从而实现与全球专家的直接指导和合作。迄今为止,HELIOS已经提供了13个会议资助和12个stsm。这些举措促进技能发展,加强全球研究网络,促进知识交流。此外,HELIOS鼓励和促进成员之间的合作出版物,为血红蛋白病领域的进步做出贡献。此外,HELIOS正在制定针对特定疾病的标准化调查和综合需求评估,以便系统地绘制参与国的诊断差距、治疗差距、数据可用性、相关政策和培训要求。这些工具对于生成可靠的数据非常重要,这些数据可以为未来的研究议程提供信息,支持临床和诊断方案的协调,并支持与卫生系统利益攸关方进行基于证据的政策对话。通过将这些努力固定在标准化的方法中,HELIOS旨在促进整个网络的一致性、可比性和跨界学习。认识到国际和跨部门合作的重要性,HELIOS设立了一个专门的角色——国际和跨部门扩展协调员,以领导扩大标准化方法的努力,并深化与其他联盟和部门的合作。这对于推动超越国界和跨学科的合作,确保HELIOS完全融入更广泛的罕见疾病和全球卫生框架至关重要。通过共享调查,HELIOS正在积极与主要的国际网络建立伙伴关系,包括ERN-EuroBloodNet、9 RADeep、INHERENT、10和HemaFAIR。这些合作促进了欧洲和国际研究项目之间的协同作用,最大限度地减少了重复工作,并调整了关键资源。虽然HELIOS行动充满希望,但它也面临挑战,包括可持续的资金、覆盖不同的人群和确保数据互操作性。为了解决这些问题,HELIOS正在积极地使资金来源多样化,与当地社区合作,并建立明确的数据标准,旨在最大限度地发挥其对血红蛋白病研究和护理的影响。由于移徙和人口结构转变,血红蛋白病的全球负担日益加重,需要采取协调一致的国际行动。通过对标准化、公平和跨境合作的承诺,HELIOS正在建立必要的基础设施和伙伴关系,以帮助塑造欧洲内外血红蛋白病研究、政策和护理的未来。通过将其活动与未满足的关键需求(即多中心研究、统一标准、有组织的培训和协调行动)结合起来,HELIOS提供了一个及时和令人信服的框架,以克服镰状细胞病和地中海贫血护理方面的持续障碍。在本作品的准备过程中,为了提高作品的可读性和语言性,作者使用了ChatGPT。使用此工具后,作者根据需要审查和编辑内容,并对出版物的内容负全部责任。Sotiroula chatzimathaiou:概念化;方法;数据管理;原创作品草案;写作——审阅和编辑;可视化;项目管理;验证;正式的分析。Fedele Bonifazi:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Anna C. Gimbert:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Raffaella colombati:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Francesco Cremonesi:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Andreas glenthen øj:写作-评论和编辑;验证。Elisabetta Mezzalira:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Coralea Stephanou:写作、评论和编辑;验证。简·特雷格-塞诺斯:写作-评论和编辑;验证。Darko Antic:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Burak Durmaz:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Eleni Gavriilaki:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Baba Inusa:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Annalisa Landi:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Mariangela Pellegrini:写作、评论和编辑;验证。Franc
{"title":"HELIOS Action: Advancing research, education, and equity in hemoglobinopathies across Europe and beyond","authors":"Sotiroula Chatzimatthaiou,&nbsp;Fedele Bonifazi,&nbsp;Anna C. Gimbert,&nbsp;Raffaella Colombatti,&nbsp;Francesco Cremonesi,&nbsp;Andreas Glenthøj,&nbsp;Elisabetta Mezzalira,&nbsp;Coralea Stephanou,&nbsp;Jan Traeger-Synodinos,&nbsp;Darko Antic,&nbsp;Burak Durmaz,&nbsp;Eleni Gavriilaki,&nbsp;Baba Inusa,&nbsp;Annalisa Landi,&nbsp;Mariangela Pellegrini,&nbsp;Francesca Basile,&nbsp;Stephanie Muth,&nbsp;Holger Cario,&nbsp;Eleni Katsantoni,&nbsp;Dilem Ruhluel,&nbsp;Carsten Werner Lederer,&nbsp;María del Mar Mañú-Pereira,&nbsp;Petros Kountouris","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70258","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70258","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Recent decades have witnessed remarkable advances in hematology research,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and yet, for many affected populations, particularly those with sickle cell disease (SCD) and Thalassemia, more so in low-resource settings, clinical outcomes remain suboptimal.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Despite being among the most common inherited disorders globally, with an estimated 330,000 conceptions annually,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; patients with hemoglobinopathies encounter fragmented care systems and unequal access to diagnosis and treatment, and there is limited coordination in research and clinical practices across countries.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Although hemoglobinopathies have gained recognition as a global public health concern,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; there are still four persistent challenges. First, there are only a limited number of harmonized, multicentric studies that capture the genetic and clinical variability of these disorders to enable personalized approaches in clinical management and treatment.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Second, care standards for hemoglobinopathies remain inconsistent, with substantial gaps between and within countries.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Third, there is limited access to structured training and clinical education, particularly in countries with underdeveloped health systems.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Finally, a fragmented research landscape has impeded the development of innovative, cross-border strategies that could guide policy and practice.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; These limitations are compounded by poor coordination globally, restricting the sharing of knowledge and the development of common standards.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The HELIOS Action (Haemoglobinopathies in European Liaison of Medicine and Science, www.heliosaction.eu) was launched in 2023 to address these persistent gaps, through networking and training activities. Funded by the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), HELIOS is a collaborative open network designed to strengthen research infrastructure, standardize care practices, and promote inclusive participation in hemoglobinopathy-related science and policy. HELIOS thus provides a coordinated and inclusive platform and facilitates concerted action to tackle major challenges in hemoglobinopathies. Specifically, HELIOS fosters multicentric collaboration and genetic mapping to address the lack of harmonized research, develops regionally adapted clinical protocols to reduce inconsistent standards, expands structured training programs to close education gaps, and strengthens international data sharing and policy engagement to overcome fragmentation. To date, the Action involves over 245 members from 36 countries (Figure 1), and continues to grow, with participants spanning Europe, Africa, Asia, North America, and Australia, reflecting the global relevance of these disorders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A key strength of the HELIOS Action lies in its inclusive and collaborative structure. As a glo","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70258","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695299","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Cellular therapies for sickle cell disease: Should we be calling them a cure? 镰状细胞病的细胞疗法:我们应该称之为治愈吗?
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70283
Lydia O. Okoibhole, Funmi Dasaolu, Zainab Garba-Sani, Stephen P. Hibbs
<p>Recent advances in gene therapy and expanded access for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have made conversations about a <i>cure</i> more pertinent for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). These advances, including the approval of exa-cel gene therapy in the United Kingdom,<span><sup>1</sup></span> have amplified the language of cure within policy, media, and clinical discussions. However, as this language becomes more visible, questions emerge about what <i>cure</i> means for individuals living with SCD, for healthcare systems, and for communities historically underserved and marginalized within research and clinical care.</p><p>The term <i>cure</i>, derived from the Latin “curare,” meaning “to care for” or “to heal,” suggests the complete elimination of symptoms caused by disease and a restoration to a previous state of health,<span><sup>2</sup></span> but in the context of a lifelong disease like SCD, the meaning is more complex.</p><p>In this article, we begin with the personal reflections of one author (F.D.) living with SCD as she grapples with the possibility and uncertainty of cellular therapies (Box 1). Next, we survey how the language of cure is used in public discussions about SCD cellular therapies. We share the account of one author (Z.G.-S.) whose experience befits the word <i>cure</i>, before exploring complexities that challenge the use of curative language. Finally, we highlight important considerations for health professionals and health systems relating to cellular therapies for SCD.</p><p>The last decade has seen a significant increase in discussion about curative therapies in SCD. In 2023, when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the gene editing therapy exa-cel, it was described as “the first CRISPR cure for a genetic disease.”<span><sup>3, 4</sup></span> Similarly, in 2025, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) described exa-cel's approval as a “potential cure for some people with severe sickle cell disease.”<span><sup>5</sup></span> This approval followed a long and complex journey of regulatory review and appeal,<span><sup>6</sup></span> which finally resulted in the National Health Service (NHS) funding this one-time therapy,<span><sup>5</sup></span> described by NHS England as a source of hope.<span><sup>1</sup></span></p><p>Additionally, conversation continues to build around allogeneic HSCT in SCD, as developments in conditioning regimens increase accessibility for a much wider group of people, including older recipients, those without a fully matched donor and those with additional comorbidities.<span><sup>7</sup></span> In a patient guide addressing SCD and HSCT, UK charities Anthony Nolan and the Sickle Cell Society described the treatment as a cure, while also defining the benefits and risks associated.<span><sup>8</sup></span> However, medical regulators, healthcare professionals, and media reports rarely explicitly define cure, and the pote
基因治疗的最新进展和造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的广泛应用使得关于镰状细胞病(SCD)患者治疗方法的讨论更加切合实际。这些进步,包括英国批准的exa- cell基因疗法1,扩大了在政策、媒体和临床讨论中的治愈语言。然而,随着这种语言变得越来越明显,关于治疗对SCD患者、医疗保健系统以及历史上在研究和临床护理中服务不足和边缘化的社区意味着什么的问题出现了。“治愈”一词源于拉丁语“curare”,意思是“照顾”或“治愈”,暗示着完全消除由疾病引起的症状,恢复到以前的健康状态,但在像SCD这样的终身疾病的背景下,其含义更为复杂。在本文中,我们从一位患有SCD的作者(F.D.)的个人反思开始,她努力应对细胞治疗的可能性和不确定性(方框1)。接下来,我们调查了治愈的语言是如何在关于SCD细胞治疗的公开讨论中使用的。在探索挑战治疗语言使用的复杂性之前,我们分享一位作者(zg.s.)的经历,他的经历适合“治疗”这个词。最后,我们强调了与SCD细胞治疗相关的卫生专业人员和卫生系统的重要考虑。在过去的十年中,关于SCD治疗方法的讨论显著增加。2023年,当美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准基因编辑疗法exa-cel时,它被描述为“首个CRISPR治疗遗传病的方法”。同样,在2025年,英国国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)将exa-cel的批准描述为“一些患有严重镰状细胞病的人的潜在治疗方法”。这一批准经历了漫长而复杂的监管审查和上诉过程,最终导致英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)资助了这种一次性疗法,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS England)将其描述为希望之源。此外,随着治疗方案的发展,更广泛的人群(包括老年受者、没有完全匹配供体的人以及有其他合并症的人)可以获得同种异体造血干细胞移植,围绕SCD的对话继续建立在一份关于SCD和HSCT的患者指南中,英国慈善机构Anthony Nolan和镰状细胞协会将这种治疗描述为一种治愈方法,同时也定义了相关的益处和风险然而,医疗监管机构、医疗保健专业人员和媒体报道很少明确定义治疗,误解的可能性很大。每一种定义都有不同的关注点:经济的、生物医学的或整体的,这就提出了一个问题:在SCD中,治愈到底意味着什么?细胞疗法具有变革性。对于那些因疼痛危机、每隔几周输血或器官并发症进行性加重而多次入院的患者来说,成功的治疗意味着摆脱这些负担。细胞疗法已被证明能显著减少甚至消除血管闭塞危象,提高血红蛋白水平,并防止进一步的器官损伤病人描述说,他们能够带着一种新的稳定和独立的感觉回到教育、工作和家庭生活中去一些人所经历的这种转变反映在“治愈”这个词中。此外,治愈的语言可以提高患者群体的可见度和希望,他们长期遭受研究投资不足,缺乏治疗方法和其他新治疗方案的退出。下面,其中一位作者(z.g.s.)分享了为什么cure准确地描述了她在HSCT后的生活(方框2)。细胞疗法不能治愈所有的身体症状。例如,许多人患有SCD的并发症,如肾病、肝病或认知障碍,细胞治疗可能会稳定这些并发症,但不能逆转此外,包括化疗、免疫治疗和放疗在内的调理方案可能会造成新的身体损伤,如不孕症、继发性癌症和其他长期并发症。如果接受同种异体造血干细胞移植的个体发生慢性移植物抗宿主病,他们将一种严重的慢性疾病换成另一种此外,可能还会出现额外的危害,例如报道的SCD基因治疗后与髓系肿瘤相关的潜在驱动突变的增加这些临床局限性反映在生活经验中。治疗语言和生活现实之间的紧张关系在Genesis Jones的故事中得到了体现,她在美国接受了SCD的HSCT,尽管她的移植手术成功植入,琼斯随后被诊断出患有继发性癌症。 她继续与慢性疼痛和以前由SCD引起的器官损伤症状作斗争。此外,一旦她不再被归类为患有SCD,她就无法获得某些形式的医疗保健。琼斯报告说,她在治疗后与自己的身份和心理健康作斗争,感觉“处于中间”,不再是SCD社区的真正一部分由于人们生来就患有SCD,它从出生起就深刻地塑造了身份,影响了个人叙事、社会互动和社区动态尽管SCD的治疗通常以治愈为框架,但它需要患者协商一种新的身份,这种身份是由他们的病情遗留问题和治疗可能带来的转变形成的。现有的与家庭成员、朋友和照顾者的关系可能会中断,需要进行重大调整。15,16正如琼斯的经历所表明的,一旦一个人被认为“治愈了”,这可能会限制他们获得的支持。例如,一个人在治疗前可能有资格获得残疾经济支持,但在治疗后就不再有资格了。然而,SCD的长期并发症,包括慢性疼痛,可能仍然深刻地影响着他们的日常生活,这突显了生物医学治疗可能无法完全符合生活现实或持续的支持需求。在细胞治疗SCD的背景下,治愈是最合适的术语吗?对于一些接受这些治疗的人来说,包括其中一位作者,答案是肯定的——治愈是一个有用的、必要的词,它既反映了这种治疗的严重性,也为更广泛的社区带来了急需的希望和关注。然而,对其他人来说,治愈语言可能会产生错误的期望,破坏幸存者、他们的扩展社区和临床医生的经历,并关闭重要的更广泛的对话。至关重要的是,围绕SCD细胞疗法的讨论是在历史不平等、健康不平等和不信任的背景下进行的。黑人社区——受到性别歧视的影响尤为严重——在研究和医疗保健方面面临着系统性的种族主义、忽视和怀疑。17,18这种情况决定了如何解释和接受治疗语言,这就需要谨慎和透明的沟通。解决这一问题对于任何关于治疗语言的讨论都是至关重要的,这不仅是为了确保公平获得新兴疗法,也是为了重建研究人员、临床医生和社区之间的信任和问责关系。如果不认识到并积极解决这些系统性的不公正,治愈治疗的承诺就有可能再现历史上塑造了SCD患者经历的同样的不平等。最后,由于缺乏深思熟虑的实施,治疗的语言可能会混淆——甚至加剧——许多患有SCD的人所面临的深层次的未满足需求。由于年龄、合并症、费用或卫生保健系统基础设施和专业知识,绝大多数SCD患者仍然无法获得这些治疗。在低收入和中等收入国家尤其如此,因为大多数SCD患者居住在这些国家。随着细胞疗法的发展,对可获得的治疗、管理和遗传咨询的投资仍然至关重要。总之,尽管“治愈”这个词面临挑战,但没有简单、完美的替代方案。“变革疗法”或“激进疗法”这些术语可能不太容易引起不切实际的期望。但也许最重要的目标是让人们看到SCD患者生活的复杂性、韧性和尊严,无论患者是否接受细胞治疗。考虑这些治疗的个人需要透明和仔细沟通的信息来做出明智的选择。卫生系统需要考虑如何从整体上支持接受细胞疗法的患者,从决策到生存。除了术语之外,重要的是要为诚实、细致的对话创造空间,讨论动机、期望、需求和治疗后的生活。Lydia O. Okoibhole:概念化;写作——审阅和编辑;原创作品。冯米·达索鲁:写作、审稿、编辑;原创作品。Zainab Garba-Sani:写作、评论和编辑;原创作品。Stephen P. Hibbs:概念化;原创作品草案;写作-审查和编辑。作者报告没有利益冲突。由惠康信托基金支持(授权号220540/Z/20/A给惠康桑格研究所和惠康连接科学)。F.D.由NIHR博士前临床学术奖学金支持,奖励号NIHR304921。S.P.H.由惠康信托基金资助的HARP博士研究奖学金(资助号223500/Z/21/Z)支持。数据共享不适用于
{"title":"Cellular therapies for sickle cell disease: Should we be calling them a cure?","authors":"Lydia O. Okoibhole,&nbsp;Funmi Dasaolu,&nbsp;Zainab Garba-Sani,&nbsp;Stephen P. Hibbs","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70283","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70283","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Recent advances in gene therapy and expanded access for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have made conversations about a &lt;i&gt;cure&lt;/i&gt; more pertinent for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD). These advances, including the approval of exa-cel gene therapy in the United Kingdom,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; have amplified the language of cure within policy, media, and clinical discussions. However, as this language becomes more visible, questions emerge about what &lt;i&gt;cure&lt;/i&gt; means for individuals living with SCD, for healthcare systems, and for communities historically underserved and marginalized within research and clinical care.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The term &lt;i&gt;cure&lt;/i&gt;, derived from the Latin “curare,” meaning “to care for” or “to heal,” suggests the complete elimination of symptoms caused by disease and a restoration to a previous state of health,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; but in the context of a lifelong disease like SCD, the meaning is more complex.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this article, we begin with the personal reflections of one author (F.D.) living with SCD as she grapples with the possibility and uncertainty of cellular therapies (Box 1). Next, we survey how the language of cure is used in public discussions about SCD cellular therapies. We share the account of one author (Z.G.-S.) whose experience befits the word &lt;i&gt;cure&lt;/i&gt;, before exploring complexities that challenge the use of curative language. Finally, we highlight important considerations for health professionals and health systems relating to cellular therapies for SCD.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The last decade has seen a significant increase in discussion about curative therapies in SCD. In 2023, when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the gene editing therapy exa-cel, it was described as “the first CRISPR cure for a genetic disease.”&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3, 4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Similarly, in 2025, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) described exa-cel's approval as a “potential cure for some people with severe sickle cell disease.”&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; This approval followed a long and complex journey of regulatory review and appeal,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; which finally resulted in the National Health Service (NHS) funding this one-time therapy,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; described by NHS England as a source of hope.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additionally, conversation continues to build around allogeneic HSCT in SCD, as developments in conditioning regimens increase accessibility for a much wider group of people, including older recipients, those without a fully matched donor and those with additional comorbidities.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In a patient guide addressing SCD and HSCT, UK charities Anthony Nolan and the Sickle Cell Society described the treatment as a cure, while also defining the benefits and risks associated.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; However, medical regulators, healthcare professionals, and media reports rarely explicitly define cure, and the pote","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70283","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695298","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
VHL, transferrin, and erythropoietin in the regulation of hepcidin VHL、转铁蛋白和促红细胞生成素在肝磷脂调节中的作用
IF 14.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-07 DOI: 10.1002/hem3.70271
Ivan Sergeev, Josef T. Prchal, Seyed Mehdi Nouraie, Binal N. Shah, Xu Zhang, Adelina Sergueeva, Galina Miasnikova, Tomas Ganz, Victor R. Gordeuk
<p>Hepcidin, the master regulator of iron metabolism, is a hepatic peptide hormone that inhibits the absorption of iron by enterocytes and the release of iron from macrophages through interaction with ferroportin in the cellular membrane.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Hepcidin binds to ferroportin, occluding it and causing it to move to the interior of cells, thereby preventing the release of cellular iron to plasma, and also causing a conformational change that leads to ferroportin ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation.<span><sup>2</sup></span> Hepcidin is upregulated in response to (1) higher intracellular iron stores and plasma iron concentrations as reflected by serum ferritin and elevated circulating transferrin-bound iron<span><sup>3</sup></span> via a bone morphogenetic protein receptor complex<span><sup>4</sup></span> and (2) inflammation through interleukin-6 and a JAK-STAT pathway.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Hepcidin is downregulated by increased erythropoiesis via erythroferrone secreted by erythroblasts, which suppresses bone morphogenetic protein receptor complex signaling.<span><sup>6</sup></span> Hypoxia downregulates hepcidin mostly indirectly, via erythropoietin and erythroferrone.<span><sup>7</sup></span> Upregulation of hypoxia sensing as seen in Chuvash erythrocytosis also leads to increased erythropoietin and erythroferrone and decreased hepcidin.<span><sup>8-10</sup></span> The relationship of hepcidin to transferrin concentration in a model that includes ferritin, erythropoietin, and upregulated hypoxia sensing has not previously been reported.</p><p>Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are dimers of a common HIF-β subunit and one of several HIF-α subunits that are regulated posttranslationally; HIF-1 and HIF-2 are best studied.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs, Fe-dependent enzymes) are the principal negative regulators of HIF-α subunits. In the presence of O<sub>2</sub> and α-ketoglutarate, HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunits are hydroxylated by PHDs, facilitating binding to von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein, which leads to their ubiquitination and rapid proteosomal degradation.<span><sup>12, 13</sup></span> In hypoxia and iron deficiency, degradation of HIF-α decreases, leading to increased HIF-1 and HIF-2 heterodimers that augment transcription of hypoxia-inducible genes.<span><sup>11</sup></span></p><p>Homozygous germline loss-of-function <i>VHL</i><sup>R200W</sup> causes congenital Chuvash erythrocytosis with thrombosis as the major cause of morbidity and mortality. <i>VHL</i><sup>R200W</sup> homozygosity leads to decreased ubiquitination of HIF-1α and HIF-2α,<span><sup>8</sup></span> which is necessary for their degradation. In turn, HIFs upregulate several genes that influence oxygen homeostasis, erythropoiesis, and iron metabolism.<span><sup>8, 14, 15</sup></span> Erythropoietin, upregulated by hypoxia and iron deficiency via HIF-2,<span><sup>16</sup></span> is increased in <i>VHL</i><sup>R200W</sup> homozygotes ev
Hepcidin是铁代谢的主要调节因子,是一种肝脏肽激素,通过与细胞膜中的铁转运蛋白相互作用,抑制肠细胞对铁的吸收和巨噬细胞对铁的释放Hepcidin与铁转运蛋白结合,阻断铁转运蛋白,使其向细胞内部移动,从而阻止细胞铁向血浆的释放,并引起构象改变,导致铁转运蛋白泛素化和溶酶体降解Hepcidin在以下情况下上调:(1)细胞内铁储量和血浆铁浓度升高,这是通过血清铁蛋白和循环转铁蛋白结合铁的升高反映的(通过骨形态发生蛋白受体复合物4);(2)通过白细胞介素-6和JAK-STAT途径引起的炎症Hepcidin通过红细胞分泌的红细胞铁素增加红细胞生成而下调,红细胞铁素抑制骨形态发生蛋白受体复合物信号传导缺氧主要通过促红细胞生成素和红铁素间接下调hepcidin在Chuvash红细胞增多症中,缺氧感知的上调也会导致促红细胞生成素和红细胞铁素的增加,以及促红细胞生成素的降低。8-10在一个包括铁蛋白、促红细胞生成素和缺氧感知上调的模型中,hepcidin与转铁蛋白浓度的关系此前未见报道。缺氧诱导因子(HIF)是一种常见的HIF-β亚基和几种翻译后调节的HIF-α亚基之一的二聚体;HIF-1和HIF-2研究得最好脯氨酸羟化酶(博士,铁依赖酶)是HIF-α亚基的主要负调控因子。在O2和α-酮戊二酸存在下,HIF-1α和HIF-2α亚基被博士羟基化,促进与von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)蛋白结合,导致其泛素化和快速蛋白体降解。12,13在缺氧和缺铁的情况下,HIF-α的降解降低,导致HIF-1和HIF-2异源二聚体增加,从而增加了缺氧诱导基因的转录。11纯合子种系功能丧失VHLR200W引起先天性Chuvash红细胞增多症,血栓形成是其发病和死亡的主要原因。VHLR200W纯合性导致HIF-1α和HIF-2α泛素化降低,这是HIF-1α和HIF-2α降解所必需的。反过来,hif上调几个影响氧稳态、红细胞生成和铁代谢的基因。缺氧和缺铁时通过hif -2,16上调的促红细胞生成素在VHLR200W纯合子中增加,即使在缺乏缺氧或缺铁的情况下8,17,红细胞铁素在VHLR200W纯合子的红系祖细胞中表达增加在缺氧和缺铁期间,HIF-1至少部分上调转铁蛋白14,在VHLR200W纯合子中,即使没有缺氧或缺铁,转铁蛋白也会增加。我们报道了Chuvash红细胞,hepcidin和铁蛋白水平低,而促红细胞生成素水平高在多变量分析中,hepcidin被VHLR200W纯合子降低,与铁蛋白正相关,但在调整VHLR200W纯合子后与促红细胞生成素不相关。然而,我们没有检查HIF上调基因转铁蛋白,也没有进行途径分析。我们现在重新研究了VHLR200W纯合性与hif -2介导的促红细胞生成素增强和hif介导的转铁蛋白增强相关的hepcidin的关系,HIF-1至少部分介导了转铁蛋白的增强。该研究得到了机构审查委员会(IRB)的批准。参与者住在俄罗斯联邦楚瓦什自治共和国,位于莫斯科东南约650公里的伏尔加河沿岸。我们研究了111个VHLR200W纯合子和29个未突变VHL的对照。在本研究中,我们之前报道了对照组和90个VHLR200W纯合子的hepcidin、铁蛋白和促红细胞生成素水平,但没有报道转铁蛋白浓度参与者从社区招募,健康状况正常,所有参与者都提供了书面知情同意。他们的特征包括病史、体格检查和外周血化验。血清样品保存于- 70°C。酶联免疫吸附法测定Hepcidin 19;转铁蛋白、促红细胞生成素和铁蛋白的分析如前所述大约一半的Chuvash红细胞增多症患者在研究开始前一年内接受过放血治疗。另一半从未接受过静脉切开术或在研究开始前一年以上接受过静脉切开术。主要研究比较了VHLR200W纯合子和基因典型正常参与者的血清hepcidin浓度,采用多元线性回归和通路分析。偏态连续变量进行对数变换以更好地接近正态分布。 采用广义线性模型对线性回归进行验证。VHLR200W纯合子和对照组的临床特征采用学生t检验或Pearson卡方检验进行评估。采用Spearman相关对各种测量值与hepcidin的双变量关系进行分析。采用Stata 18.0软件(StataCorp, College Station, TX)进行分析。通路分析探讨了VHLR200W纯合性作为hepcidin浓度的预测因子,特别关注促红细胞生成素和转铁蛋白分别作为HIF-2和HIF-1通路增加的介质,以预测血清hepcidin浓度。如表S1所示,与我们之前的报告一致,在单因素分析中,VHLR200W纯合子的血清hepcidin和铁蛋白浓度明显较低,血清促红细胞生成素浓度(HIF-2途径的标志物)明显较高。在VHLR200W纯合子中,血清转铁蛋白浓度(至少部分是HIF-1途径的标记物)也显著较高。如表S2所示,在单变量分析中,血清铁蛋白与血清hepcidin呈显著的Spearman正相关,而年龄、VHLR200W纯合性、血清促红细胞生成素、血清转铁蛋白与hepcidin呈显著的负相关。表1显示了与血清hepcidin浓度相关的多变量分析。我们首先分析了hepcidin与血清铁蛋白和VHLR200W纯合性的关系(表1A)。血清铁蛋白与hepcidin呈强独立正相关(P = 0.0001), VHLR200W纯合性与模型呈强负相关(P = 0.0001), r2为0.367。接下来,我们对血清hepcidin进行了多变量分析,包括血清铁蛋白、VHLR200W纯合性、血清促红细胞生成素(代表HIF-2信号增加)和血清转铁蛋白(代表HIF-1信号增加)(表1B)。血清铁蛋白继续与hepcidin呈强正相关(P = 0.004),而VHLR200W纯合性不再呈显著负相关(P = 0.085)。血清转铁蛋白呈显著负相关(P = 0.015),血清促红细胞生成素呈临界负相关(P = 0.094),提示VHLR200W纯合性与hepcidin的负相关表现为转铁蛋白和促红细胞生成素。该模型的r2为0.404,高于仅含铁蛋白和VHLR200W纯合子模型的r2。一项血清hepcidin的多变量分析剔除了作为hepcidin水平预测因子的VHLR200W纯合性,代之以促红细胞生成素和转铁蛋白(表1C),证实了VHLR200W纯合性对hepcidin的影响以促红细胞生成素和转铁蛋白为代表。血清铁蛋白继续与hepcidin呈强正相关(P = 0.005),红细胞生成素(P = 0.004)和转铁蛋白(P = 0.0004)呈显著负相关,模型r2为0.391,高于铁蛋白与VHLR200W纯合子模型的r2。如图1所示,通路分析表明,VHLR200W纯合性与hif -2调节的血清促红细胞生成素增加和血清转铁蛋白增加有很强的关系,至少部分由HIF-1调节。反过来,促红细胞生成素和转铁蛋白浓度的增加与hepcidin水平的降低密切相关。同时,铁蛋白浓度升高与hepcidin水平升高有密切关系。同时,正如预期的那样,较高的血清铁蛋白浓度与较低的血清转铁蛋白水平相关。总之,我们现在在多变量和途径分析中表明,纯合子VHLR200W突变与血清促红细胞生成素和转铁蛋白浓度的升高密切相关,而在考虑铁蛋白对促
{"title":"VHL, transferrin, and erythropoietin in the regulation of hepcidin","authors":"Ivan Sergeev,&nbsp;Josef T. Prchal,&nbsp;Seyed Mehdi Nouraie,&nbsp;Binal N. Shah,&nbsp;Xu Zhang,&nbsp;Adelina Sergueeva,&nbsp;Galina Miasnikova,&nbsp;Tomas Ganz,&nbsp;Victor R. Gordeuk","doi":"10.1002/hem3.70271","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70271","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Hepcidin, the master regulator of iron metabolism, is a hepatic peptide hormone that inhibits the absorption of iron by enterocytes and the release of iron from macrophages through interaction with ferroportin in the cellular membrane.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;1&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Hepcidin binds to ferroportin, occluding it and causing it to move to the interior of cells, thereby preventing the release of cellular iron to plasma, and also causing a conformational change that leads to ferroportin ubiquitination and lysosomal degradation.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Hepcidin is upregulated in response to (1) higher intracellular iron stores and plasma iron concentrations as reflected by serum ferritin and elevated circulating transferrin-bound iron&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; via a bone morphogenetic protein receptor complex&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;4&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; and (2) inflammation through interleukin-6 and a JAK-STAT pathway.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;5&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Hepcidin is downregulated by increased erythropoiesis via erythroferrone secreted by erythroblasts, which suppresses bone morphogenetic protein receptor complex signaling.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;6&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Hypoxia downregulates hepcidin mostly indirectly, via erythropoietin and erythroferrone.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;7&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Upregulation of hypoxia sensing as seen in Chuvash erythrocytosis also leads to increased erythropoietin and erythroferrone and decreased hepcidin.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8-10&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The relationship of hepcidin to transferrin concentration in a model that includes ferritin, erythropoietin, and upregulated hypoxia sensing has not previously been reported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are dimers of a common HIF-β subunit and one of several HIF-α subunits that are regulated posttranslationally; HIF-1 and HIF-2 are best studied.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Prolyl hydroxylases (PHDs, Fe-dependent enzymes) are the principal negative regulators of HIF-α subunits. In the presence of O&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; and α-ketoglutarate, HIF-1α and HIF-2α subunits are hydroxylated by PHDs, facilitating binding to von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein, which leads to their ubiquitination and rapid proteosomal degradation.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;12, 13&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; In hypoxia and iron deficiency, degradation of HIF-α decreases, leading to increased HIF-1 and HIF-2 heterodimers that augment transcription of hypoxia-inducible genes.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;11&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Homozygous germline loss-of-function &lt;i&gt;VHL&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;R200W&lt;/sup&gt; causes congenital Chuvash erythrocytosis with thrombosis as the major cause of morbidity and mortality. &lt;i&gt;VHL&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;R200W&lt;/sup&gt; homozygosity leads to decreased ubiquitination of HIF-1α and HIF-2α,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; which is necessary for their degradation. In turn, HIFs upregulate several genes that influence oxygen homeostasis, erythropoiesis, and iron metabolism.&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;8, 14, 15&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; Erythropoietin, upregulated by hypoxia and iron deficiency via HIF-2,&lt;span&gt;&lt;sup&gt;16&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/span&gt; is increased in &lt;i&gt;VHL&lt;/i&gt;&lt;sup&gt;R200W&lt;/sup&gt; homozygotes ev","PeriodicalId":12982,"journal":{"name":"HemaSphere","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hem3.70271","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145695024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
HemaSphere
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1