Proactive deep learning-facilitated inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling: An implementation study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY International Archives of Allergy and Immunology Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1159/000542589
Melinda Jiang, Brandon Stretton, Joshua Kovoor, Joshua M Inglis, Sophia Thompkins, Carlo Yuson, Sepehr Shakib, William B Smith, Stephen Bacchi
{"title":"Proactive deep learning-facilitated inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling: An implementation study.","authors":"Melinda Jiang, Brandon Stretton, Joshua Kovoor, Joshua M Inglis, Sophia Thompkins, Carlo Yuson, Sepehr Shakib, William B Smith, Stephen Bacchi","doi":"10.1159/000542589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Erroneous penicillin allergy labels are associated with significant health and economic costs. This study aimed to determine whether deep learning-facilitated proactive consultation to facilitate delabelling may further enhance inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective implementation study utilised a deep learning-guided proactive consultation service, which utilized an inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling protocol. The intervention group comprised all admitted inpatients with a penicillin allergy over the course of a 14-week period in a tertiary hospital. The rate of penicillin allergy delabelling in the intervention group was compared to that of a historical control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 439 patients included in the study, of whom 121 were identified by the algorithm as suitable for penicillin allergy interrogation. 16.5% of those identified by the algorithm were successfully delabelled in the inpatient setting within the same admission, and 9.9% were referred for outpatient testing. This result was statistically significantly greater compared to the rate of delabelling in the historical control group (0%, P = 0.00001). There were no adverse reactions. The projected annual savings associated with the program over a 12-month period was $1,170,617.16.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deep learning-facilitated proactive inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling was effective, safe, and economical in this single-centre implementation study. Further studies should seek to examine this approach in diverse centres.</p>","PeriodicalId":13652,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Allergy and Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542589","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Erroneous penicillin allergy labels are associated with significant health and economic costs. This study aimed to determine whether deep learning-facilitated proactive consultation to facilitate delabelling may further enhance inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling.

Methods: This prospective implementation study utilised a deep learning-guided proactive consultation service, which utilized an inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling protocol. The intervention group comprised all admitted inpatients with a penicillin allergy over the course of a 14-week period in a tertiary hospital. The rate of penicillin allergy delabelling in the intervention group was compared to that of a historical control group.

Results: There were 439 patients included in the study, of whom 121 were identified by the algorithm as suitable for penicillin allergy interrogation. 16.5% of those identified by the algorithm were successfully delabelled in the inpatient setting within the same admission, and 9.9% were referred for outpatient testing. This result was statistically significantly greater compared to the rate of delabelling in the historical control group (0%, P = 0.00001). There were no adverse reactions. The projected annual savings associated with the program over a 12-month period was $1,170,617.16.

Conclusion: Deep learning-facilitated proactive inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling was effective, safe, and economical in this single-centre implementation study. Further studies should seek to examine this approach in diverse centres.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动深度学习促进住院患者青霉素过敏去标签:一项实施研究。
错误的青霉素过敏标签与重大的健康和经济成本相关。本研究旨在确定深度学习促进主动咨询以促进去标签是否可以进一步增强住院患者青霉素过敏去标签。方法:这项前瞻性实施研究采用了深度学习引导的主动咨询服务,该服务采用了住院青霉素过敏去标签方案。干预组包括所有在三级医院住院14周的青霉素过敏患者。将干预组青霉素过敏脱标率与历史对照组进行比较。结果:共纳入439例患者,其中121例经算法确定适合进行青霉素过敏询问。在同一入院期间,16.5%的算法识别的患者在住院环境中成功去标签,9.9%的患者被转诊进行门诊检测。与历史对照组的去标签率(0%,P = 0.00001)相比,该结果具有统计学意义。无不良反应。在12个月的时间里,该计划预计每年节省1170,617.16美元。结论:在这项单中心实施的研究中,深度学习促进的住院患者青霉素过敏主动去标签是有效、安全且经济的。进一步的研究应设法在不同的中心审查这种办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
105
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ''International Archives of Allergy and Immunology'' provides a forum for basic and clinical research in modern molecular and cellular allergology and immunology. Appearing monthly, the journal publishes original work in the fields of allergy, immunopathology, immunogenetics, immunopharmacology, immunoendocrinology, tumor immunology, mucosal immunity, transplantation and immunology of infectious and connective tissue diseases.
期刊最新文献
Identifying novel inflammatory protein biomarkers and drug targets of inflammatory bowel disease by integrating Mendelian randomization, bioinformatics, and druggability analysis. Proactive deep learning-facilitated inpatient penicillin allergy delabelling: An implementation study. The Role of Climate and Residency in Storage Mite Sensitivity Among Children with Allergic Diseases in The Mediterranean Region. Upadacitinib and Dupilumab Demonstrate Superior Efficacy in the Treatment of Adolescent Atopic Dermatitis: A Network Meta-Analysis. Use of biologics to treat asthma during pregnancy and adverse events in pregnant women and newborns: A global pharmacovigilance analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1