Polysaccharide lyase PL3.3 possibly potentiating Clostridioides difficile clinical symptoms based on complete genome analysis of RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54.

IF 2.3 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY International Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1007/s10123-025-00634-x
Sen Zhang, Wen Ma, Xin Zhang, Weitong Cui, Youhan Liu, Xuewen Tian, Qinglu Wang, Ying Luo
{"title":"Polysaccharide lyase PL3.3 possibly potentiating Clostridioides difficile clinical symptoms based on complete genome analysis of RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54.","authors":"Sen Zhang, Wen Ma, Xin Zhang, Weitong Cui, Youhan Liu, Xuewen Tian, Qinglu Wang, Ying Luo","doi":"10.1007/s10123-025-00634-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clostridioides difficile has rapidly become a major cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea worldwide due to the misuse of antibiotics. Our previous study confirmed that RT046/ST35 strain is associated with more severe clinical symptoms compared to RT012/ST54 strain. We conducted genome comparison of the RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54 strains using whole-genome sequencing technology. The RT046/ST35 strain had a genome length of 7,869,254 bp with a GC content of 29.49%. The original length of the RT012/ST54 strain was 7,499,568 bp with a GC content of 29.64%. Additionally, we detected plasmid1 in the RT046/ST54 strain. We found that the RT046/ST35 strain had more genomic islands compared to the RT012/ST54 strain, and we identified polysaccharide lyase (PL) in the region around 2.2 M. Furthermore, we discovered that the increased severity of clinical symptoms in the RT046/ST35 strain compared to the RT012/ST54 strain was unrelated to virulence factors and emphasized the potential crucial role of PL in RT046/ST35. There were almost no differences in eggNOG annotation and KEGG annotation between RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54. RT046/ST35 had more mRNA processes in GO annotation. In conclusion, our study suggests that the core factor contributing to the more serious clinical symptoms of the RT046/ST35 strain compared to the RT012/ST54 strain is possibly PL.</p>","PeriodicalId":14318,"journal":{"name":"International Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-025-00634-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clostridioides difficile has rapidly become a major cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea worldwide due to the misuse of antibiotics. Our previous study confirmed that RT046/ST35 strain is associated with more severe clinical symptoms compared to RT012/ST54 strain. We conducted genome comparison of the RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54 strains using whole-genome sequencing technology. The RT046/ST35 strain had a genome length of 7,869,254 bp with a GC content of 29.49%. The original length of the RT012/ST54 strain was 7,499,568 bp with a GC content of 29.64%. Additionally, we detected plasmid1 in the RT046/ST54 strain. We found that the RT046/ST35 strain had more genomic islands compared to the RT012/ST54 strain, and we identified polysaccharide lyase (PL) in the region around 2.2 M. Furthermore, we discovered that the increased severity of clinical symptoms in the RT046/ST35 strain compared to the RT012/ST54 strain was unrelated to virulence factors and emphasized the potential crucial role of PL in RT046/ST35. There were almost no differences in eggNOG annotation and KEGG annotation between RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54. RT046/ST35 had more mRNA processes in GO annotation. In conclusion, our study suggests that the core factor contributing to the more serious clinical symptoms of the RT046/ST35 strain compared to the RT012/ST54 strain is possibly PL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于RT046/ST35和RT012/ST54的全基因组分析,多糖裂解酶PL3.3可能增强艰难梭菌的临床症状
由于抗生素的滥用,艰难梭菌已迅速成为世界范围内医院感染性腹泻的主要原因。我们之前的研究证实,RT046/ST35菌株与RT012/ST54菌株相比,临床症状更严重。采用全基因组测序技术对RT046/ST35和RT012/ST54菌株进行基因组比较。RT046/ST35菌株基因组长度为7,869,254 bp, GC含量为29.49%。RT012/ST54菌株的原始长度为7,499,568 bp, GC含量为29.64%。此外,我们在RT046/ST54菌株中检测到质粒1。我们发现RT046/ST35菌株与RT012/ST54菌株相比具有更多的基因组岛,并且我们在2.2 m左右的区域发现了多糖裂解酶(PL)。此外,我们发现RT046/ST35菌株与RT012/ST54菌株相比临床症状严重程度的增加与毒力因素无关,并强调了PL在RT046/ST35中潜在的关键作用。RT046/ST35和RT012/ST54之间的eggNOG注释和KEGG注释几乎没有差异。RT046/ST35在GO注释中有更多的mRNA进程。综上所述,我们的研究提示,导致RT046/ST35菌株比RT012/ST54菌株临床症状更严重的核心因素可能是PL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Microbiology
International Microbiology 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: International Microbiology publishes information on basic and applied microbiology for a worldwide readership. The journal publishes articles and short reviews based on original research, articles about microbiologists and their work and questions related to the history and sociology of this science. Also offered are perspectives, opinion, book reviews and editorials. A distinguishing feature of International Microbiology is its broadening of the term microbiology to include eukaryotic microorganisms.
期刊最新文献
Diversity, characterization, and biotechnological potential of plant growth-promoting bacteria from Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) (Crassulaceae) roots and rhizosphere soil. Polysaccharide lyase PL3.3 possibly potentiating Clostridioides difficile clinical symptoms based on complete genome analysis of RT046/ST35 and RT012/ST54. Differences of microbial growth and biofilm formation among periprosthetic joint infection-causing species: an animal study. Unlocking olive rhizobacteria: harnessing biocontrol power to combat olive root rot and promote plant growth. The effects of nickel tungstate nanoparticles (NiWO4 NPs) on freshwater microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata (Chlorophyceae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1