Assessing the Current Limitations of Large Language Models in Advancing Health Care Education.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Formative Research Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.2196/51319
JaeYong Kim, Bathri Narayan Vajravelu
{"title":"Assessing the Current Limitations of Large Language Models in Advancing Health Care Education.","authors":"JaeYong Kim, Bathri Narayan Vajravelu","doi":"10.2196/51319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>The integration of large language models (LLMs), as seen with the generative pretrained transformers series, into health care education and clinical management represents a transformative potential. The practical use of current LLMs in health care sparks great anticipation for new avenues, yet its embracement also elicits considerable concerns that necessitate careful deliberation. This study aims to evaluate the application of state-of-the-art LLMs in health care education, highlighting the following shortcomings as areas requiring significant and urgent improvements: (1) threats to academic integrity, (2) dissemination of misinformation and risks of automation bias, (3) challenges with information completeness and consistency, (4) inequity of access, (5) risks of algorithmic bias, (6) exhibition of moral instability, (7) technological limitations in plugin tools, and (8) lack of regulatory oversight in addressing legal and ethical challenges. Future research should focus on strategically addressing the persistent challenges of LLMs highlighted in this paper, opening the door for effective measures that can improve their application in health care education.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e51319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/51319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlabelled: The integration of large language models (LLMs), as seen with the generative pretrained transformers series, into health care education and clinical management represents a transformative potential. The practical use of current LLMs in health care sparks great anticipation for new avenues, yet its embracement also elicits considerable concerns that necessitate careful deliberation. This study aims to evaluate the application of state-of-the-art LLMs in health care education, highlighting the following shortcomings as areas requiring significant and urgent improvements: (1) threats to academic integrity, (2) dissemination of misinformation and risks of automation bias, (3) challenges with information completeness and consistency, (4) inequity of access, (5) risks of algorithmic bias, (6) exhibition of moral instability, (7) technological limitations in plugin tools, and (8) lack of regulatory oversight in addressing legal and ethical challenges. Future research should focus on strategically addressing the persistent challenges of LLMs highlighted in this paper, opening the door for effective measures that can improve their application in health care education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估目前大型语言模型在促进卫生保健教育方面的局限性。
未标记:将大型语言模型(llm)整合到医疗保健教育和临床管理中,就像在生成式预训练变压器系列中看到的那样,代表了一种变革潜力。当前法学硕士在医疗保健领域的实际应用激发了人们对新途径的极大期待,但它的拥抱也引发了相当大的担忧,需要仔细考虑。本研究旨在评估最先进的法学硕士在医疗保健教育中的应用,突出以下缺点,作为需要重大和迫切改进的领域:(1)对学术诚信的威胁;(2)错误信息的传播和自动化偏见的风险;(3)对信息完整性和一致性的挑战;(4)获取不公平;(5)算法偏见的风险;(6)道德不稳定的表现;(7)插件工具的技术限制;(8)在应对法律和道德挑战方面缺乏监管。未来的研究应侧重于战略性地解决法学硕士在本文中强调的持续挑战,为有效措施打开大门,以提高法学硕士在卫生保健教育中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Digital Tool (Technology-Assisted Problem Management Plus) for Lay Health Workers to Address Common Mental Health Disorders: Co-production and Usability Study in Pakistan. Factors Influencing Telemedicine Adoption Among Health Care Professionals: Qualitative Interview Study. Methods to Adjust for Confounding in Test-Negative Design COVID-19 Effectiveness Studies: Simulation Study. Multimodal Pain Recognition in Postoperative Patients: Machine Learning Approach. Designing the First Pregnancy Guaranteed Income Program in the United States: Qualitative Needs Assessment and Human-Centered Design to Develop the Abundant Birth Project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1