Assessment of Rare Cancers and Sarcoma Policy and Sarcoma Drug Approvals in Latin America: A Report From the LACOG Sarcoma Group.

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Global Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1200/GO.24.00239
Douglas Dias E Silva, Bruna Bianca Lopes David, Veridiana Pires de Camargo, Renee Zon Filipi, María Lucila González Donna, Juan Carlos Haro Varas, Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz, Maycos L Zapata, Cicero Luiz Cunha Martins, Matias Chacon, Rafael Schmerling, Reynaldo Jesus Garcia, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana
{"title":"Assessment of Rare Cancers and Sarcoma Policy and Sarcoma Drug Approvals in Latin America: A Report From the LACOG Sarcoma Group.","authors":"Douglas Dias E Silva, Bruna Bianca Lopes David, Veridiana Pires de Camargo, Renee Zon Filipi, María Lucila González Donna, Juan Carlos Haro Varas, Rodrigo Ramella Munhoz, Maycos L Zapata, Cicero Luiz Cunha Martins, Matias Chacon, Rafael Schmerling, Reynaldo Jesus Garcia, Roberto Carmagnani Pestana","doi":"10.1200/GO.24.00239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The availability of drugs and national public policies for patients with rare cancers, including sarcomas, varies in different parts of the world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this manuscript, we have conducted a comprehensive analysis to evaluate rare cancer policies in Latin American countries' national policy documents. Additionally, we have reviewed the approvals for sarcoma drugs in selected Latin American countries and compared them with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approvals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The documents reviewed showed a lack of explicit focus on rare cancers, with no mention in 70% of the countries analyzed. Drug approval data reveal that in the last 15 years, the FDA and EMA have approved 19 and 13 drugs for sarcoma, whereas their Latin American counterparts, namely ANVISA, ANMAT, and COFEPRIS, approved six, eight, and seven drugs, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest that improving rare cancer and sarcoma care in Latin America requires enhanced collaboration for better rare cancer policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO.24.00239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The availability of drugs and national public policies for patients with rare cancers, including sarcomas, varies in different parts of the world.

Methods: In this manuscript, we have conducted a comprehensive analysis to evaluate rare cancer policies in Latin American countries' national policy documents. Additionally, we have reviewed the approvals for sarcoma drugs in selected Latin American countries and compared them with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approvals.

Results: The documents reviewed showed a lack of explicit focus on rare cancers, with no mention in 70% of the countries analyzed. Drug approval data reveal that in the last 15 years, the FDA and EMA have approved 19 and 13 drugs for sarcoma, whereas their Latin American counterparts, namely ANVISA, ANMAT, and COFEPRIS, approved six, eight, and seven drugs, respectively.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that improving rare cancer and sarcoma care in Latin America requires enhanced collaboration for better rare cancer policies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
拉丁美洲罕见癌症和肉瘤政策和肉瘤药物批准的评估:来自LACOG肉瘤组的报告。
目的:世界不同地区对包括肉瘤在内的罕见癌症患者的药物供应和国家公共政策各不相同。方法:本文对拉美国家国家政策文件中的罕见癌政策进行综合分析评价。此外,我们还审查了选定拉丁美洲国家的肉瘤药物批准,并将其与美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的批准进行了比较。结果:审查的文件显示,缺乏对罕见癌症的明确关注,70%的分析国家没有提及。药物批准数据显示,在过去15年中,FDA和EMA分别批准了19种和13种治疗肉瘤的药物,而拉丁美洲的同行,即ANVISA、ANMAT和COFEPRIS,分别批准了6种、8种和7种药物。结论:我们的数据表明,改善拉丁美洲的罕见癌症和肉瘤治疗需要加强合作,以制定更好的罕见癌症政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JCO Global Oncology
JCO Global Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
310
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Genomic Testing in Brazil: Navigating Challenges and Harnessing Opportunities for Global Health Impact. Treatment Pattern and Outcome of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Resource-Constrained Countries: Experience at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Treatment Patterns for Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Across Eight Mexican Centers: The ALEBRIJE Study. Erratum: Radiation Therapist Education and Training: An International Survey. Pacific Peoples' Experiences of Cancer and Its Treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand Through Talanoa: A Qualitative Study of Samoan and Tongan Participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1