Sungsoo Park , Heesuk Kim , Kilchae Hwang , Duckjin Hong , Estephanie Padua , Eunjung Kim , Hyeyoung Oh
{"title":"Screening of Candida auris upon admission to an intensive care unit in the United Arab Emirates","authors":"Sungsoo Park , Heesuk Kim , Kilchae Hwang , Duckjin Hong , Estephanie Padua , Eunjung Kim , Hyeyoung Oh","doi":"10.1016/j.jiph.2025.102659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Candida auris</em> screening is one of the crucial components of infection prevention and control measures to curb the spread of <em>C. auris</em>. However, previous research has yielded various results on the effectiveness of <em>C. auris</em> screening according to region, type of healthcare facility, and patient group in the various levels of endemicity. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of routine <em>C. auris</em> screening upon admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study involved 3356 ICU patients during pre-screening (N = 1658, June 2020 to November 2021) and post-screening period (N = 1698, June 2022 to November 2023). Swabs for <em>C. auris</em> screening were taken from axilla and groin, then cultured, and identified using either matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry or VITEK 2 YST identification card. We compared the positivity rates of <em>C. auris</em> during the pre- and post-screening period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 1698 patients who underwent <em>C. auris</em> screening, only 4 (0.2 %) tested positive. The positivity rates before and after the introduction of the screening program were 2.92 cases per 1000 patient days (36/12333) and 2.36 (21/8909), respectively, without significant difference (P = 0.435). Interrupted times series analysis showed no immediate (P = 0.775) or sustained (P = 0.484) effects from the screening program. Subgroup analysis of patients in the medical ICU showed similar results.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Universal <em>C. auris</em> screening upon ICU admission identified a small number of cases. Instead, targeted screening and regular point prevalence surveys, along with other infection prevention and control measures may be employed. Further studies in various settings with diverse testing strategies are needed to establish the most effective approach for <em>C. auris</em> screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","volume":"18 3","pages":"Article 102659"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034125000085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Candida auris screening is one of the crucial components of infection prevention and control measures to curb the spread of C. auris. However, previous research has yielded various results on the effectiveness of C. auris screening according to region, type of healthcare facility, and patient group in the various levels of endemicity. We aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness of routine C. auris screening upon admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods
This retrospective study involved 3356 ICU patients during pre-screening (N = 1658, June 2020 to November 2021) and post-screening period (N = 1698, June 2022 to November 2023). Swabs for C. auris screening were taken from axilla and groin, then cultured, and identified using either matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry or VITEK 2 YST identification card. We compared the positivity rates of C. auris during the pre- and post-screening period.
Results
Of the 1698 patients who underwent C. auris screening, only 4 (0.2 %) tested positive. The positivity rates before and after the introduction of the screening program were 2.92 cases per 1000 patient days (36/12333) and 2.36 (21/8909), respectively, without significant difference (P = 0.435). Interrupted times series analysis showed no immediate (P = 0.775) or sustained (P = 0.484) effects from the screening program. Subgroup analysis of patients in the medical ICU showed similar results.
Conclusions
Universal C. auris screening upon ICU admission identified a small number of cases. Instead, targeted screening and regular point prevalence surveys, along with other infection prevention and control measures may be employed. Further studies in various settings with diverse testing strategies are needed to establish the most effective approach for C. auris screening.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection and Public Health, first official journal of the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences and the Saudi Association for Public Health, aims to be the foremost scientific, peer-reviewed journal encompassing infection prevention and control, microbiology, infectious diseases, public health and the application of healthcare epidemiology to the evaluation of health outcomes. The point of view of the journal is that infection and public health are closely intertwined and that advances in one area will have positive consequences on the other.
The journal will be useful to all health professionals who are partners in the management of patients with communicable diseases, keeping them up to date. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on infection control and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners.
It is our aim to improve healthcare by reducing risk of infection and related adverse outcomes by critical review, selection, and dissemination of new and relevant information in the field of infection control, public health and infectious diseases in all healthcare settings and the community.