AERIAL BUFFER APPLICATIONS OF NALED FOR ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA.

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.2987/24-7190
Whitney A Qualls, Steven Smoleroff, Dana Smith, Rui-De Xue
{"title":"AERIAL BUFFER APPLICATIONS OF NALED FOR ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA.","authors":"Whitney A Qualls, Steven Smoleroff, Dana Smith, Rui-De Xue","doi":"10.2987/24-7190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aerial applications of pesticides for adult mosquito control have emerged as effective tools in integrated mosquito management due to wider reach compared with ground-based methods. A key determinant for efficacy is the swath or line of spray deposition. This study aimed to assess the potential of aerial buffer sprays, which specifically target mosquito habitats, in comparison to traditional full-area aerial and ground-based applications. The efficacy and cost implications of these methods were evaluated in hot spot areas of St. Johns County, FL. Mosquito populations in 4 areas, 2 for buffer aerial (St. Johns County Golf Course and World Golf Village), 1 for full aerial (Flagler Estate), and 1 for ground-based (Elkton) treatments, were assessed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps baited with octenol. Following treatments, mosquito population reductions and service request changes were evaluated. For aerial applications, the organophosphate naled was used, while ground applications used the pyrethroid Aqualuer® 20-20. Buffer aerial applications averaged 668.5 ha, significantly smaller than full aerial treatments (3750.2 ha). Cost and volume for buffer applications were notably lower ($1,998.47 and 34.1 liters) than full treatments ($10,558.40 and 180.6 liters). Mosquito populations posttreatment showed a 63.6% reduction for buffer applications, 59% for full aerial applications, and a 52% increase for ground-based treatments. Service request reductions were varied, with a slight increase (0.13%) after buffer aerial treatments and substantial reductions after full aerial (29.4%) and ground applications (87.5%). Buffer aerial applications demonstrated potential as an effective and cost-efficient method for mosquito control in targeted habitats. Although further evaluations are essential, such strategies could reshape mosquito management practices in regions similar to the Anastasia Mosquito Control District of St. Johns County.</p>","PeriodicalId":17192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2987/24-7190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aerial applications of pesticides for adult mosquito control have emerged as effective tools in integrated mosquito management due to wider reach compared with ground-based methods. A key determinant for efficacy is the swath or line of spray deposition. This study aimed to assess the potential of aerial buffer sprays, which specifically target mosquito habitats, in comparison to traditional full-area aerial and ground-based applications. The efficacy and cost implications of these methods were evaluated in hot spot areas of St. Johns County, FL. Mosquito populations in 4 areas, 2 for buffer aerial (St. Johns County Golf Course and World Golf Village), 1 for full aerial (Flagler Estate), and 1 for ground-based (Elkton) treatments, were assessed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention light traps baited with octenol. Following treatments, mosquito population reductions and service request changes were evaluated. For aerial applications, the organophosphate naled was used, while ground applications used the pyrethroid Aqualuer® 20-20. Buffer aerial applications averaged 668.5 ha, significantly smaller than full aerial treatments (3750.2 ha). Cost and volume for buffer applications were notably lower ($1,998.47 and 34.1 liters) than full treatments ($10,558.40 and 180.6 liters). Mosquito populations posttreatment showed a 63.6% reduction for buffer applications, 59% for full aerial applications, and a 52% increase for ground-based treatments. Service request reductions were varied, with a slight increase (0.13%) after buffer aerial treatments and substantial reductions after full aerial (29.4%) and ground applications (87.5%). Buffer aerial applications demonstrated potential as an effective and cost-efficient method for mosquito control in targeted habitats. Although further evaluations are essential, such strategies could reshape mosquito management practices in regions similar to the Anastasia Mosquito Control District of St. Johns County.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佛罗里达州东北部圣约翰县成蚊空中缓冲剂的应用。
与地面方法相比,空中施用杀虫剂控制成蚊已成为蚊虫综合管理的有效工具,其覆盖范围更广。效果的关键决定因素是喷雾沉积的条纹或线条。本研究旨在评估空中缓冲喷雾剂的潜力,该喷雾剂专门针对蚊子栖息地,与传统的全区域空中和地面应用相比。在佛罗里达州圣约翰县热点地区对这些方法的效果和成本影响进行了评估。使用美国疾病控制和预防中心以烯醇为诱饵的灯诱,评估了4个地区的蚊子种群,其中2个地区为缓冲空中处理(圣约翰县高尔夫球场和世界高尔夫村),1个地区为全空中处理(弗拉格勒庄园),1个地区为地面处理(埃尔克顿)。对治疗后蚊虫数量减少和服务要求变化情况进行了评价。对于空中应用,使用有机磷酸酯,而地面应用使用拟除虫菊酯Aqualuer®20-20。缓冲空中处理的平均面积为668.5公顷,明显小于完全空中处理(3750.2公顷)。缓冲液应用的成本和体积(1,998.47美元和34.1升)明显低于完全处理(10,558.40美元和180.6升)。处理后,缓冲施药使蚊虫数量减少63.6%,空中施药使蚊虫数量减少59%,地面施药使蚊虫数量增加52%。服务请求的减少幅度各不相同,缓冲空中处理后略有增加(0.13%),全面空中处理后大幅减少(29.4%),地面处理后大幅减少(87.5%)。缓冲空中应用证明了在目标生境中作为有效和经济有效的蚊虫控制方法的潜力。虽然进一步的评估是必要的,但这种策略可以在类似于圣约翰县阿纳斯塔西娅蚊虫控制区的地区重塑蚊子管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association (JAMCA) encourages the submission of previously unpublished manuscripts contributing to the advancement of knowledge of mosquitoes and other arthropod vectors. The Journal encourages submission of a wide range of scientific studies that include all aspects of biology, ecology, systematics, and integrated pest management. Manuscripts exceeding normal length (e. g., monographs) may be accepted for publication as a supplement to the regular issue.
期刊最新文献
A STAND-ALONE TOOL FOR MOSQUITO EGG ENUMERATION. AERIAL BUFFER APPLICATIONS OF NALED FOR ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, NORTHEASTERN FLORIDA. AEDES JAPONICUS: A TENANT INVADER IN THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK, USA1. NEW OCCURRENCES OF PHYTOTELMATA-INHABITING MOSQUITOES SPECIES IN NORTHWESTERN ARGENTINA. Occurrence Of Limatus Durhamii In Artificial Containers In Atlantic Forest, São Paulo, Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1