The McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Psychiatric Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000827
Farah Semaan, Paul E Croarkin
{"title":"The McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Review.","authors":"Farah Semaan, Paul E Croarkin","doi":"10.1097/PRA.0000000000000827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) poses significant challenges for early identification and diagnosis due to its intricate symptomatology that overlaps with other psychiatric illnesses. To address this challenge, the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD (MSI-BPD) was developed to identify individuals displaying potential BPD symptoms. This review aims to consolidate the current limited body of research on the MSI-BPD, delving into its origins, the rigor of its validation process, its practicality in clinical settings, and potential applications. By comprehensively examining these aspects, clinicians and researchers involved in BPD assessment and diagnosis can develop a deeper understanding of the instrument's utility. The MSI-BPD's development involved meticulous consideration of BPD diagnostic criteria, resulting in a tool tailored to effectively capture relevant symptoms. Validation studies have provided supportive evidence for its accuracy in identifying individuals at risk of BPD, thereby underlining its utility as a resource for early screening and intervention in clinical settings. However, it is essential to acknowledge that, while the MSI-BPD demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties and utility as a screening tool for BPD, its diagnostic accuracy may vary across diverse populations. Consequently, clinicians and academics must judiciously consider sample characteristics and potential limitations when utilizing this instrument in both clinical and research contexts. Recognizing the advantages and potential applications of the MSI-BPD within a comprehensive approach to addressing BPD is important for professionals working in the field of BPD assessment and diagnosis. It is important to emphasize that the MSI-BPD is a screening tool and one data point in understanding patients presenting with complex symptomatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","volume":"31 1","pages":"20-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRA.0000000000000827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) poses significant challenges for early identification and diagnosis due to its intricate symptomatology that overlaps with other psychiatric illnesses. To address this challenge, the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD (MSI-BPD) was developed to identify individuals displaying potential BPD symptoms. This review aims to consolidate the current limited body of research on the MSI-BPD, delving into its origins, the rigor of its validation process, its practicality in clinical settings, and potential applications. By comprehensively examining these aspects, clinicians and researchers involved in BPD assessment and diagnosis can develop a deeper understanding of the instrument's utility. The MSI-BPD's development involved meticulous consideration of BPD diagnostic criteria, resulting in a tool tailored to effectively capture relevant symptoms. Validation studies have provided supportive evidence for its accuracy in identifying individuals at risk of BPD, thereby underlining its utility as a resource for early screening and intervention in clinical settings. However, it is essential to acknowledge that, while the MSI-BPD demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties and utility as a screening tool for BPD, its diagnostic accuracy may vary across diverse populations. Consequently, clinicians and academics must judiciously consider sample characteristics and potential limitations when utilizing this instrument in both clinical and research contexts. Recognizing the advantages and potential applications of the MSI-BPD within a comprehensive approach to addressing BPD is important for professionals working in the field of BPD assessment and diagnosis. It is important to emphasize that the MSI-BPD is a screening tool and one data point in understanding patients presenting with complex symptomatology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘型人格障碍麦克林筛查工具的研究进展。
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)由于其复杂的症状与其他精神疾病重叠,对早期识别和诊断提出了重大挑战。为了应对这一挑战,开发了McLean BPD筛查仪(MSI-BPD)来识别显示潜在BPD症状的个体。本综述旨在整合目前有限的MSI-BPD研究,深入研究其起源,其验证过程的严谨性,其在临床环境中的实用性和潜在的应用。通过全面检查这些方面,参与BPD评估和诊断的临床医生和研究人员可以更深入地了解该仪器的用途。MSI-BPD的开发涉及对BPD诊断标准的细致考虑,从而产生了一种专门用于有效捕获相关症状的工具。验证研究为其在识别BPD风险个体方面的准确性提供了支持性证据,从而强调了其作为临床环境中早期筛查和干预资源的实用性。然而,必须承认的是,虽然MSI-BPD表现出令人满意的心理测量特性和作为BPD筛查工具的效用,但其诊断准确性在不同人群中可能存在差异。因此,临床医生和学者在临床和研究中使用该仪器时必须审慎考虑样本特征和潜在的局限性。认识到MSI-BPD在解决BPD的综合方法中的优势和潜在应用,对于在BPD评估和诊断领域工作的专业人员非常重要。需要强调的是,MSI-BPD是一种筛查工具,也是了解具有复杂症状的患者的一个数据点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
159
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Psychiatric Practice® seizes the day with its emphasis on the three Rs — readability, reliability, and relevance. Featuring an eye-catching style, the journal combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with practical and informative tips for treating patients. Mental health professionals will want access to this review journal — for sharpening their clinical skills, discovering the best in treatment, and navigating this rapidly changing field. Journal of Psychiatric Practice combines clinically applicable reviews, case studies, and articles on treatment advances with informative "how to" tips for surviving in a managed care environment.
期刊最新文献
Association of Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome and First Episode Psychosis: A Case Report. Because of γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Glutamate Imbalance, Gut Microbiota, or Both? Delirious Mania Induced by Ciprofloxacin Use: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. DSM-5-TR Clinical Cases. Evaluative Research on Psychodynamic Therapy: Foundations and Recent Advances. How Quickly Multiple Medication Use Can Start: A Medication for Every Complaint on the First Visit Compromising the Ability to Determine Cause and Effect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1