Effects of preferred music on internal load in adult recreational athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16178-6
Romina T Herodek, Aleksandra Z Aleksić Veljković, Mladen D Živković, Aleksandra Đ Ilić, Slavoljub V Uzunović, Nebojša Trajković
{"title":"Effects of preferred music on internal load in adult recreational athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Romina T Herodek, Aleksandra Z Aleksić Veljković, Mladen D Živković, Aleksandra Đ Ilić, Slavoljub V Uzunović, Nebojša Trajković","doi":"10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16178-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When exercising to preferred music (PM), participants found more satisfaction and less typical exercise-related fatigue, which made it easier and more enjoyable to maintain the physical activity (PA) until the exercise goals were achieved. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis was to determine whether changes on internal training load in adult recreational athletes were modified by listening to PM and non-preferred music (NPM), during different PA.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A music-focused search was performed on the Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant articles to this topic published after 2000 to investigate the effects of PM on psychophysiological responses to PA.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. The research studies' sample sizes varied from ten to twenty-five participants. Heart rate (HR) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) on internal training load were the selected indicators. The use of different kinds of music had mostly, non-significant effects on HR and RPE toward the ability of music to allow participants to dissociate from the intensity level they are experiencing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The meta-analysis confirmed that preferred music had no significant effect on HRmean or RPE. The results of this review contradict the idea that listening to music improves exercise performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.24.16178-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: When exercising to preferred music (PM), participants found more satisfaction and less typical exercise-related fatigue, which made it easier and more enjoyable to maintain the physical activity (PA) until the exercise goals were achieved. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis was to determine whether changes on internal training load in adult recreational athletes were modified by listening to PM and non-preferred music (NPM), during different PA.

Evidence acquisition: A music-focused search was performed on the Google Scholar, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant articles to this topic published after 2000 to investigate the effects of PM on psychophysiological responses to PA.

Evidence synthesis: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. The research studies' sample sizes varied from ten to twenty-five participants. Heart rate (HR) and rate of perceived exertion (RPE) on internal training load were the selected indicators. The use of different kinds of music had mostly, non-significant effects on HR and RPE toward the ability of music to allow participants to dissociate from the intensity level they are experiencing.

Conclusions: The meta-analysis confirmed that preferred music had no significant effect on HRmean or RPE. The results of this review contradict the idea that listening to music improves exercise performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
偏好音乐对成年休闲运动员内部负荷的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
当在喜欢的音乐(PM)下锻炼时,参与者发现更多的满足感和更少的典型的运动相关疲劳,这使得保持身体活动(PA)更容易和更愉快,直到锻炼目标实现。本综述和荟萃分析的目的是确定在不同的PA期间,听PM和非首选音乐(NPM)是否会改变成年休闲运动员内部训练负荷的变化。证据获取:在b谷歌Scholar、PubMed和Web of Science数据库中进行了以音乐为重点的搜索,以确定2000年以后发表的与该主题相关的文章,以调查PM对PA的心理生理反应的影响。证据综合:12项研究符合纳入标准并纳入定性分析。研究的样本量从10人到25人不等。内训负荷下的心率(HR)和感知用力率(RPE)是选取的指标。不同类型音乐的使用对HR和RPE的影响主要是不显著的,因为音乐能让参与者从他们正在经历的强度水平中分离出来。结论:meta分析证实,偏好的音乐对HRmean或RPE无显著影响。这篇综述的结果反驳了听音乐能提高运动表现的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
393
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness publishes scientific papers relating to the area of the applied physiology, preventive medicine, sports medicine and traumatology, sports psychology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Caribbean and Latin dance: evidence about health in professional and non-professional dancers. Characteristics of trunk and pelvic kinematics during batting motion in baseball players with low back pain history. An intermittent recovery test for soccer players: a validation study. Differences in throwing kinematics due to changes in run-up speed in javelin throwing. Cut-off values for estimated cardiorespiratory fitness in terms of physical functioning among middle-aged to older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1