Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity at any Dose Reduces All-Cause Dementia Risk Regardless of Frailty Status.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105456
Amal A Wanigatunga, Yiwen Dong, Mu Jin, Andrew Leroux, Erjia Cui, Xinkai Zhou, Angela Zhao, Jennifer A Schrack, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jeremy D Walston, Qian-Li Xue, Martin A Lindquist, Ciprian M Crainiceanu
{"title":"Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity at any Dose Reduces All-Cause Dementia Risk Regardless of Frailty Status.","authors":"Amal A Wanigatunga, Yiwen Dong, Mu Jin, Andrew Leroux, Erjia Cui, Xinkai Zhou, Angela Zhao, Jennifer A Schrack, Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jeremy D Walston, Qian-Li Xue, Martin A Lindquist, Ciprian M Crainiceanu","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Reaching the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) recommendations of 150 min/wk is difficult for older adults, particularly among those living with frailty and its associated risk of dementia. We examined the dose-response relationship between MVPA and dementia risk among at-risk persons living with and without frailty enrolled in the UK Biobank study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survival analysis within a prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>Participants at risk for all-cause dementia who wore an Axivity AX3 triaxial wrist-worn accelerometer between February 2013 and December 2015.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MVPA was estimated from wrist-worn accelerometry in a subpopulation of the UK Biobank study. A modified version of the physical frailty phenotype was used to define frailty. Associations between MVPA dose (including interactions with frailty) and first-time incident dementia were analyzed using Cox regression models. MVPA was treated continuously and categorically across 5 levels to estimate the dose-response curve. Models were adjusted for demographics, frailty status, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 89,667 adults (median age, 63 years; 56% women), with 735 participants developing dementia over an average of 4.4 years. Average weekly MVPA was 126 minutes. Each 30 minutes higher MVPA was associated with a 4% reduction in the risk of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99). The hazard ratios for engaging in 0-34.9, 35-69.9, 70-139.9, and ≥140 MVPA minutes per week were 0.59, 0.40, 0.37, and 0.31, respectively (P < .05 for all) compared with 0 MVPA minutes per week. All associations were similar across frailty status (interaction P for all models > .21).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our results suggest engaging in any additional amount of MVPA reduces dementia risk, with the highest benefit appearing among individuals with no MVPA. These associations are not substantially modified by frailty status.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Reaching the moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) recommendations of 150 min/wk is difficult for older adults, particularly among those living with frailty and its associated risk of dementia. We examined the dose-response relationship between MVPA and dementia risk among at-risk persons living with and without frailty enrolled in the UK Biobank study.

Design: Survival analysis within a prospective cohort study.

Settings and participants: Participants at risk for all-cause dementia who wore an Axivity AX3 triaxial wrist-worn accelerometer between February 2013 and December 2015.

Methods: MVPA was estimated from wrist-worn accelerometry in a subpopulation of the UK Biobank study. A modified version of the physical frailty phenotype was used to define frailty. Associations between MVPA dose (including interactions with frailty) and first-time incident dementia were analyzed using Cox regression models. MVPA was treated continuously and categorically across 5 levels to estimate the dose-response curve. Models were adjusted for demographics, frailty status, and comorbidities.

Results: This study included 89,667 adults (median age, 63 years; 56% women), with 735 participants developing dementia over an average of 4.4 years. Average weekly MVPA was 126 minutes. Each 30 minutes higher MVPA was associated with a 4% reduction in the risk of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99). The hazard ratios for engaging in 0-34.9, 35-69.9, 70-139.9, and ≥140 MVPA minutes per week were 0.59, 0.40, 0.37, and 0.31, respectively (P < .05 for all) compared with 0 MVPA minutes per week. All associations were similar across frailty status (interaction P for all models > .21).

Conclusions and implications: Our results suggest engaging in any additional amount of MVPA reduces dementia risk, with the highest benefit appearing among individuals with no MVPA. These associations are not substantially modified by frailty status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无论身体虚弱与否,任何剂量的中高强度体力活动都能降低全因痴呆风险。
目标:老年人很难达到150分钟/周的中等至高强度体力活动(MVPA)推荐值,尤其是那些身体虚弱且有痴呆风险的老年人。我们在英国生物银行的研究中检查了MVPA与痴呆风险之间的剂量-反应关系。设计:前瞻性队列研究中的生存分析。设置和参与者:2013年2月至2015年12月期间佩戴Axivity AX3三轴腕带加速度计的有全因痴呆风险的参与者。方法:在英国生物银行研究的一个亚群中,通过腕带加速度计估计MVPA。身体脆弱表型的修改版本被用来定义脆弱。使用Cox回归模型分析MVPA剂量(包括与虚弱的相互作用)与首次发生痴呆之间的关系。MVPA连续治疗,分类治疗5个水平,以估计剂量-反应曲线。模型根据人口统计学、虚弱状态和合并症进行了调整。结果:本研究纳入89,667名成人(中位年龄63岁;(56%为女性),735名参与者在平均4.4年的时间里患上了痴呆症。平均每周MVPA为126分钟。MVPA每提高30分钟,全因痴呆的风险降低4%(风险比,0.96;95% ci, 0.93-0.99)。与每周0 MVPA分钟相比,每周0-34.9分钟、35-69.9分钟、70-139.9分钟和≥140 MVPA分钟的风险比分别为0.59、0.40、0.37和0.31(均P < 0.05)。所有的关联在虚弱状态下都是相似的(所有模型的交互P为0.21)。结论和意义:我们的研究结果表明,参与任何额外量的MVPA都可以降低痴呆风险,在没有MVPA的个体中获益最大。这些关联不会因身体虚弱而发生实质性的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Medication Use in People Aged 90 Years and Older: A Nationwide Study. Adherence to Guideline Recommendations on Psychotropic Drug Use for Challenging Behavior in Dementia. Quality and Safety Indicators for Care Transitions by Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Experiences of Care Aides Caring for Residents with a History of Psychological Trauma in Long-Term Care Homes (Nursing Homes)-Early Findings. Association between Multimorbidity and End-of-Life Outcomes among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Evidence from 28 Countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1