>6°(C) of separation: Exploring the difference between perceived and measured temperature.

IF 2.9 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY Journal of thermal biology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104044
Jennifer M Fitchett
{"title":">6°(C) of separation: Exploring the difference between perceived and measured temperature.","authors":"Jennifer M Fitchett","doi":"10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Questionnaires exploring tourists' perceptions of ideal climatic conditions are argued to be a more suitable data source for the development of tourism climate indices than the utilization and integration of expert opinion and pre-established thresholds. This assumes that those tourist respondents can accurately quantify meteorological conditions at a given point in time, and effectively discriminate between meteorological thresholds of suitable and unsuitable conditions. For variables such as rainfall and sunshine hours, this assumption is fairly reasonable. However, where tourists' perceptions, captured through questionnaire responses, are used to set thresholds for air temperature and thermal comfort, it is important to determine whether those perceptions are valid. Previous studies contest this, indicating considerable differences in perceptions of heat thresholds based on terminology, nationality, destination, and time of the year. In this study, a benchmarking exercise is performed comparing perceived temperatures and thermal comfort to measured values, through questionnaires administered to 984 adults in South Africa. Findings indicated that while 19.9% of responses are within 1 °C of measured temperatures, up to 12.8% of respondents perceive temperatures as being at least 6 °C higher or lower than the measured values. There are no clear geographic or demographic variables that effectively discriminate between accurate and inaccurate responses. When asked to classify their level of thermal comfort, as opposed to quantifying temperatures, results aligned more closely with measures and classifications of effective temperature. Based on these results, we argue that greater caution should be applied when using temperature thresholds derived from questionnaire data in developing and calibrating any biometeorological indices, and focus instead should be placed on catergorized levels of self-reported thermal comfort in environments where raw meteorological conditions are measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":17428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of thermal biology","volume":"127 ","pages":"104044"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of thermal biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2025.104044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questionnaires exploring tourists' perceptions of ideal climatic conditions are argued to be a more suitable data source for the development of tourism climate indices than the utilization and integration of expert opinion and pre-established thresholds. This assumes that those tourist respondents can accurately quantify meteorological conditions at a given point in time, and effectively discriminate between meteorological thresholds of suitable and unsuitable conditions. For variables such as rainfall and sunshine hours, this assumption is fairly reasonable. However, where tourists' perceptions, captured through questionnaire responses, are used to set thresholds for air temperature and thermal comfort, it is important to determine whether those perceptions are valid. Previous studies contest this, indicating considerable differences in perceptions of heat thresholds based on terminology, nationality, destination, and time of the year. In this study, a benchmarking exercise is performed comparing perceived temperatures and thermal comfort to measured values, through questionnaires administered to 984 adults in South Africa. Findings indicated that while 19.9% of responses are within 1 °C of measured temperatures, up to 12.8% of respondents perceive temperatures as being at least 6 °C higher or lower than the measured values. There are no clear geographic or demographic variables that effectively discriminate between accurate and inaccurate responses. When asked to classify their level of thermal comfort, as opposed to quantifying temperatures, results aligned more closely with measures and classifications of effective temperature. Based on these results, we argue that greater caution should be applied when using temperature thresholds derived from questionnaire data in developing and calibrating any biometeorological indices, and focus instead should be placed on catergorized levels of self-reported thermal comfort in environments where raw meteorological conditions are measured.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
>6°(C)的分离:探索感知温度和测量温度之间的差异。
调查游客对理想气候条件的感知的问卷调查被认为是更适合于旅游气候指数开发的数据源,而不是利用和整合专家意见和预先设定的阈值。这是假设这些游客受访者能够准确地量化给定时间点的气象条件,并有效区分适宜和不适宜条件的气象阈值。对于降雨量和日照时数等变量,这种假设是相当合理的。然而,当游客的感知(通过问卷调查获得)被用来设定空气温度和热舒适的阈值时,确定这些感知是否有效是重要的。先前的研究反驳了这一观点,表明根据术语、国籍、目的地和一年中的时间,人们对热阈值的看法存在相当大的差异。在这项研究中,通过对南非984名成年人进行问卷调查,进行了一项基准测试,将感知温度和热舒适与测量值进行比较。调查结果表明,虽然19.9%的答复在测量温度1°C以内,但多达12.8%的答复者认为温度比测量值至少高出或低于6°C。没有明确的地理或人口变量可以有效区分准确和不准确的回答。当被要求对他们的热舒适水平进行分类时,而不是量化温度,结果与有效温度的测量和分类更接近。基于这些结果,我们认为,在开发和校准任何生物气象指数时,在使用从问卷数据中得出的温度阈值时应更加谨慎,而应将重点放在测量原始气象条件的环境中自我报告的热舒适分类水平上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of thermal biology
Journal of thermal biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
196
审稿时长
14.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thermal Biology publishes articles that advance our knowledge on the ways and mechanisms through which temperature affects man and animals. This includes studies of their responses to these effects and on the ecological consequences. Directly relevant to this theme are: • The mechanisms of thermal limitation, heat and cold injury, and the resistance of organisms to extremes of temperature • The mechanisms involved in acclimation, acclimatization and evolutionary adaptation to temperature • Mechanisms underlying the patterns of hibernation, torpor, dormancy, aestivation and diapause • Effects of temperature on reproduction and development, growth, ageing and life-span • Studies on modelling heat transfer between organisms and their environment • The contributions of temperature to effects of climate change on animal species and man • Studies of conservation biology and physiology related to temperature • Behavioural and physiological regulation of body temperature including its pathophysiology and fever • Medical applications of hypo- and hyperthermia Article types: • Original articles • Review articles
期刊最新文献
Single and combined effects of environmental heat stress and physical exercise on thermoregulation, executive function, and cerebral oxygenation. Supercooling tolerance in the Mexican lizard Barisia imbricata (Squamata: Anguidae). Critical reproductive behaviors in Scaled Quail and Northern Bobwhite are affected by thermal variability and mean temperature. Acclimation, thermal tolerance and aerobic metabolism of narrow-clawed crayfish, Pontastacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823). Repeatability of critical thermal maximum (CTmax) in two freshwater ectotherms across contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1