Heterogeneity in the use of osseous risk factors and limited use of relevant patient-reported outcome measurements in studies investigating treatment of patellar dislocation: A scoping review.
Ebrahim Rahdi, Catarina Anna Evelina Malmberg, Adam Witten, Tue Smith Jørgensen, Rafal Yahya, Lars Blønd, Per Hölmich, Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod
{"title":"Heterogeneity in the use of osseous risk factors and limited use of relevant patient-reported outcome measurements in studies investigating treatment of patellar dislocation: A scoping review.","authors":"Ebrahim Rahdi, Catarina Anna Evelina Malmberg, Adam Witten, Tue Smith Jørgensen, Rafal Yahya, Lars Blønd, Per Hölmich, Kristoffer Weisskirchner Barfod","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The treatment of patellar dislocation is tailored based on the presence or absence of osseous risk factors. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate whether existing research addresses patient differences by mapping the use of osseous risk factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in studies investigating the treatment of patellar dislocation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Studies published between 1 January 2013 and 3 April 2023 were included if they investigated the treatment of patellar dislocation and registered osseous risk factor(s). Case series with fewer than 10 patients, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8923 records were identified, of which 1007 articles underwent full-text screening, and 300 met the inclusion criteria. A twofold increase in articles investigating patellar dislocation treatment was observed between the years 2013 and 2022. This review identified 176 osseous risk factors and 56 PROMs. Among the included articles, 131 (44%) utilized osseous risk factors as in- or exclusion criteria, and 26 (9%) employed a PROM specifically developed for patellar instability evaluation. The most frequently investigated treatment was medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (231 articles, 77%), followed by tibial tubercle osteotomies (87 articles, 29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is considerable heterogeneity among studies investigating the treatment of patellar dislocation. Less than half of studies define the patient population according to osseous risk factors, and only 1 in 10 studies use a PROM designed for patellar dislocation. This complicates the evaluation of treatment effects in relation to osseous risk factors.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12581","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The treatment of patellar dislocation is tailored based on the presence or absence of osseous risk factors. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate whether existing research addresses patient differences by mapping the use of osseous risk factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in studies investigating the treatment of patellar dislocation.
Methods: This study was a scoping review conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews. Studies published between 1 January 2013 and 3 April 2023 were included if they investigated the treatment of patellar dislocation and registered osseous risk factor(s). Case series with fewer than 10 patients, reviews and meta-analyses were excluded.
Results: A total of 8923 records were identified, of which 1007 articles underwent full-text screening, and 300 met the inclusion criteria. A twofold increase in articles investigating patellar dislocation treatment was observed between the years 2013 and 2022. This review identified 176 osseous risk factors and 56 PROMs. Among the included articles, 131 (44%) utilized osseous risk factors as in- or exclusion criteria, and 26 (9%) employed a PROM specifically developed for patellar instability evaluation. The most frequently investigated treatment was medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (231 articles, 77%), followed by tibial tubercle osteotomies (87 articles, 29%).
Conclusion: There is considerable heterogeneity among studies investigating the treatment of patellar dislocation. Less than half of studies define the patient population according to osseous risk factors, and only 1 in 10 studies use a PROM designed for patellar dislocation. This complicates the evaluation of treatment effects in relation to osseous risk factors.
期刊介绍：
Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication.
The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance.
Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards.
Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
