The effects of bilateral M1 anodal tDCS on corticomotor excitability and acquisition the of a bimanual videogame skill.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-01-19 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.028
Davin Greenwell, Hayami Nishio, Jacob Feigh, Quinn McCallion, Brach Poston, Zachary A Riley
{"title":"The effects of bilateral M1 anodal tDCS on corticomotor excitability and acquisition the of a bimanual videogame skill.","authors":"Davin Greenwell, Hayami Nishio, Jacob Feigh, Quinn McCallion, Brach Poston, Zachary A Riley","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Most activities of daily life involve some degree of coordinated, bimanual activity from the upper limbs. However, compared to single-handed movements, bimanual movements are processed, learned, and controlled from both hemispheres of the brain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that enhances motor learning by modulating the activity of movement-associated brain regions. While effective in simple, single-handed tasks, tDCS has shown mixed results in complex bimanual tasks. This study investigated the effects of bilateral M1 anodal tDCS (biM1 a-tDCS) on learning and cortical excitability during a customized, bimanual racing videogame task. Thirty-six right-handed adults completed three lab visits (∼48 h apart), practicing the task while receiving either biM1 a-tDCS or SHAM tDCS. Cortical excitability was measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electromyography (EMG) before and after the first visit. Though all subjects demonstrated improvements over the course of the study, our analyses revealed significantly faster rates of learning on days 1 & 2, but not day 3, of practice in subjects receiving biM1 a-tDCS. Moreover, perhaps due to differences in baseline gaming experience and aptitude, this effect appeared to be stronger in female subjects. Interestingly, no significant differences in corticomotor excitability were observed between conditions. Though biM1 a-tDCS did not appear to impact corticomotor excitability, our results contribute to the growing body of evidence which seems to suggest that multifocal tDCS protocols may be superior to traditional, single-site tDCS for the enhancement of bimanual motor learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"231-239"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most activities of daily life involve some degree of coordinated, bimanual activity from the upper limbs. However, compared to single-handed movements, bimanual movements are processed, learned, and controlled from both hemispheres of the brain. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that enhances motor learning by modulating the activity of movement-associated brain regions. While effective in simple, single-handed tasks, tDCS has shown mixed results in complex bimanual tasks. This study investigated the effects of bilateral M1 anodal tDCS (biM1 a-tDCS) on learning and cortical excitability during a customized, bimanual racing videogame task. Thirty-six right-handed adults completed three lab visits (∼48 h apart), practicing the task while receiving either biM1 a-tDCS or SHAM tDCS. Cortical excitability was measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electromyography (EMG) before and after the first visit. Though all subjects demonstrated improvements over the course of the study, our analyses revealed significantly faster rates of learning on days 1 & 2, but not day 3, of practice in subjects receiving biM1 a-tDCS. Moreover, perhaps due to differences in baseline gaming experience and aptitude, this effect appeared to be stronger in female subjects. Interestingly, no significant differences in corticomotor excitability were observed between conditions. Though biM1 a-tDCS did not appear to impact corticomotor excitability, our results contribute to the growing body of evidence which seems to suggest that multifocal tDCS protocols may be superior to traditional, single-site tDCS for the enhancement of bimanual motor learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双侧M1淋巴结tDCS对皮质运动兴奋性和双手电子游戏技能习得的影响。
大多数日常生活活动都涉及上肢在一定程度上的协调和双手活动。然而,与单手运动相比,双手运动是由大脑的两个半球处理、学习和控制的。经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,通过调节大脑运动相关区域的活动来增强运动学习。虽然tDCS在简单的单手任务中有效,但在复杂的双手任务中表现出好坏参半的结果。本研究调查了双侧M1节点tDCS (biM1 -tDCS)在定制的、手工的赛车视频游戏任务中对学习和皮层兴奋性的影响。36名右撇子成人完成了三次实验室访问(间隔约48 h),在接受biM1 a-tDCS或SHAM tDCS的同时练习任务。在首次就诊前后分别用经颅磁刺激(TMS)和肌电图(EMG)测量皮质兴奋性。尽管所有受试者在整个研究过程中都表现出了进步,但我们的分析显示,接受biM1 a-tDCS的受试者在第1天和第2天的学习速度明显加快,而在第3天则没有。此外,也许是由于基线游戏经验和天赋的差异,这种影响在女性受试者中表现得更强。有趣的是,在不同条件下,皮质运动性兴奋性没有显著差异。虽然biM1 a-tDCS似乎没有影响皮质运动兴奋性,但我们的研究结果提供了越来越多的证据,这些证据似乎表明,多灶tDCS方案可能优于传统的单点tDCS,以增强双手运动学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Effects of ascorbic acid on myelination in offspring of advanced maternal age. Repeated exposure to high-dose nicotine induces prefrontal gray matter atrophy in adolescent male rats. Bayesian brain theory: Computational neuroscience of belief. Effects and mechanisms of Apelin in treating central nervous system diseases. Neuroticism and cerebral small vessel disease: A genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1