Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02191-z
Xiaopeng Guo, Qinfeng Han, Qian Chen, Min Shan, Ruifang She, Kun Yang
{"title":"Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.","authors":"Xiaopeng Guo, Qinfeng Han, Qian Chen, Min Shan, Ruifang She, Kun Yang","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02191-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the safety of visual percutaneous tracheostomy (vPDT) in neurologic intensive care unit (NICU) patients who are under anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 54 NICU patients who underwent vPDT at Tai'an Central Hospital from September 2022 to September 2023. The cohort included 36 men and 18 women aged 36-90 years (mean age 62.24 ± 12.24 years). Patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment: an anticoagulant and antithrombotic group (22 patients) and a non-anticoagulant and non-antithrombotic group (32 patients). Clinical data, including demographic information, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score before vPDT, time from NICU admission to vPDT, laboratory indicators, and vPDT complications, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of vPDT complications in the anticoagulant and antithrombotic group was 18.2%, involving three cases of minor intraoperative bleeding and one case of posterior airway wall injury. The non-anticoagulant and non-antithrombotic group had an 18.8% complication rate, including four cases of minor intraoperative bleeding, one case of subcutaneous emphysema with local infection, and one unrelated death. No significant difference in vPDT complications was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the anticoagulant and antithrombotic group had a higher average age, higher GCS scores, and longer time intervals from NICU admission to vPDT and from intubation to vPDT (all P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>vPDT appears to be a safe and feasible procedure for NICU patients receiving anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy, with no significant increase in complications compared to those not on such therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02191-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to evaluate the safety of visual percutaneous tracheostomy (vPDT) in neurologic intensive care unit (NICU) patients who are under anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 54 NICU patients who underwent vPDT at Tai'an Central Hospital from September 2022 to September 2023. The cohort included 36 men and 18 women aged 36-90 years (mean age 62.24 ± 12.24 years). Patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment: an anticoagulant and antithrombotic group (22 patients) and a non-anticoagulant and non-antithrombotic group (32 patients). Clinical data, including demographic information, comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score before vPDT, time from NICU admission to vPDT, laboratory indicators, and vPDT complications, were analyzed.

Results: The incidence of vPDT complications in the anticoagulant and antithrombotic group was 18.2%, involving three cases of minor intraoperative bleeding and one case of posterior airway wall injury. The non-anticoagulant and non-antithrombotic group had an 18.8% complication rate, including four cases of minor intraoperative bleeding, one case of subcutaneous emphysema with local infection, and one unrelated death. No significant difference in vPDT complications was observed between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the anticoagulant and antithrombotic group had a higher average age, higher GCS scores, and longer time intervals from NICU admission to vPDT and from intubation to vPDT (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: vPDT appears to be a safe and feasible procedure for NICU patients receiving anticoagulant and antithrombotic therapy, with no significant increase in complications compared to those not on such therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目视经皮气管切开术在神经危重症抗凝、抗血栓患者中的安全性分析。
背景:本研究旨在评估视觉经皮气管造口术(vPDT)在接受抗凝和抗血栓治疗的神经重症监护病房(NICU)患者中的安全性。方法:对2022年9月至2023年9月在泰安市中心医院行vPDT的54例NICU患者进行回顾性队列研究。该队列包括36名男性和18名女性,年龄36-90岁(平均年龄62.24±12.24岁)。患者根据治疗情况分为两组:抗凝和抗血栓组(22例)和非抗凝和非抗血栓组(32例)。分析临床数据,包括人口统计学信息、合并症、vPDT前格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、NICU入院至vPDT的时间、实验室指标和vPDT并发症。结果:抗凝抗栓组vPDT并发症发生率为18.2%,其中术中轻微出血3例,后气道壁损伤1例。非抗凝和非抗栓组并发症发生率为18.8%,其中4例术中轻微出血,1例皮下肺气肿合并局部感染,1例非相关死亡。两组vPDT并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。然而,抗凝和抗血栓组的平均年龄更高,GCS评分更高,从NICU入院到vPDT以及从插管到vPDT的时间间隔更长(均为P结论:vPDT对于接受抗凝和抗血栓治疗的NICU患者来说似乎是一种安全可行的手术,与未接受此类治疗的患者相比,并发症没有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
期刊最新文献
Palliative Care Spiritual Assessment and Goals-of-Care Discussions in the Neurocritical Care Unit: Collaborating with Chaplains. States Do Not Delineate the "Accepted Medical Standards" for Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination. Does Celecoxib Actually Reduce Mortality in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage? Hemoglobin Decrements are Associated with Ischemic Brain Lesions and Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Safety Analysis of Visual Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Neurocritical Care Patients with Anticoagulation and Antithrombosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1