Biomarker testing in lung cancer: from bench to bedside.

IF 3.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY Oncology Reviews Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/or.2024.1445826
Ullas Batra, Shrinidhi Nathany
{"title":"Biomarker testing in lung cancer: from bench to bedside.","authors":"Ullas Batra, Shrinidhi Nathany","doi":"10.3389/or.2024.1445826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the poster child of personalized medicine. With increased knowledge about biomarkers and the consequent improvement in survival rates, NSCLC has changed from being a therapeutic nihilistic disease to that characterized by therapeutic enthusiasm. The routine biomarkers tested in NSCLC are EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. However, several additional biomarkers have been added to the diagnostic landscape. Current guidelines recommend testing at least seven biomarkers upfront at the time of NSCLC diagnosis-emphasizing the wide range of targets and corresponding therapies that can be leveraged for disease management. Sequential single-gene testing is not only time-consuming but also leads to tissue exhaustion. Multigene panel testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers an attractive diagnostic substitute that aligns with the evolving dynamics of precision medicine. NGS enables the identification of point mutations, insertions, deletions, copy number alterations, fusion genes, and microsatellite instability information needed to guide the potential use of targeted therapy. This article reviews the existing guidelines, proposed recommendations for NGS in non-squamous NSCLC, real-world data on its use, and the advantages of adopting broader panel-based NGS testing over single-gene testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":19487,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Reviews","volume":"18 ","pages":"1445826"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/or.2024.1445826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the poster child of personalized medicine. With increased knowledge about biomarkers and the consequent improvement in survival rates, NSCLC has changed from being a therapeutic nihilistic disease to that characterized by therapeutic enthusiasm. The routine biomarkers tested in NSCLC are EGFR, ALK, and ROS1. However, several additional biomarkers have been added to the diagnostic landscape. Current guidelines recommend testing at least seven biomarkers upfront at the time of NSCLC diagnosis-emphasizing the wide range of targets and corresponding therapies that can be leveraged for disease management. Sequential single-gene testing is not only time-consuming but also leads to tissue exhaustion. Multigene panel testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers an attractive diagnostic substitute that aligns with the evolving dynamics of precision medicine. NGS enables the identification of point mutations, insertions, deletions, copy number alterations, fusion genes, and microsatellite instability information needed to guide the potential use of targeted therapy. This article reviews the existing guidelines, proposed recommendations for NGS in non-squamous NSCLC, real-world data on its use, and the advantages of adopting broader panel-based NGS testing over single-gene testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌生物标志物检测:从实验室到临床。
非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是个体化医疗的典型代表。随着对生物标志物知识的增加和生存率的提高,非小细胞肺癌已经从治疗虚无性疾病转变为以治疗热情为特征的疾病。NSCLC的常规生物标志物是EGFR、ALK和ROS1。然而,一些额外的生物标志物已经被添加到诊断领域。目前的指南建议在非小细胞肺癌诊断时至少检测7种生物标志物,强调广泛的靶点和相应的治疗方法可以用于疾病管理。序列单基因检测不仅耗时而且会导致组织耗竭。使用下一代测序(NGS)的多基因小组检测提供了一种有吸引力的诊断替代方案,与精密医学的发展动态保持一致。NGS能够识别点突变、插入、缺失、拷贝数改变、融合基因和微卫星不稳定性信息,从而指导靶向治疗的潜在应用。本文回顾了现有的指南、NGS在非鳞状NSCLC中的建议、其使用的实际数据,以及采用更广泛的基于面板的NGS检测相对于单基因检测的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oncology Reviews
Oncology Reviews ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Oncology Reviews is a quarterly peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes authoritative state-of-the-art reviews on preclinical and clinical aspects of oncology. The journal will provide up-to-date information on the latest achievements in different fields of oncology for both practising clinicians and basic researchers. Oncology Reviews aims at being international in scope and readership, as reflected also by its Editorial Board, gathering the world leading experts in both pre-clinical research and everyday clinical practice. The journal is open for publication of supplements, monothematic issues and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editor-in-Chief or the publisher.
期刊最新文献
Status analysis of quality control of administered infusion solution with cytotoxic drugs. Biomarker testing in lung cancer: from bench to bedside. RAGE and its ligands in breast cancer progression and metastasis. A case of synovial sarcoma of the right mid-thigh and literature review. Lymphadenectomy in the treatment of sarcomas - indications and technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1