{"title":"Assessment of different U-Net backbones in segmenting colorectal adenocarcinoma from H&E histopathology.","authors":"Sagarika Sengupta, Genevieve Chyrmang, Kangkana Bora, Himanish Shekhar Das, Aimin Li, Bernardo Lemos, Saurav Mallik","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2025.155820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adenocarcinoma, the most prevalent type of colorectal cancer, makes up roughly 95 % of all cases and is associated with a notably high mortality rate. Owing to the various risk factors which might include personal choices and habits or genetic factors, the risk of developing the cancer for every individual might vary. However, given the statistics, the rate of acquiring the disease is pretty high. Therefore, based on the need for early detection and diagnosis of the disease, there is a pressing demand for an automated system to accurately identify adenocarcinoma in the colorectal region by utilizing the concept of binary segmentation wherein two classes are employed to indicate the presence as well as the absence of the condition. To address this, the project explored several deep learning-based segmentation methods-such as U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net with ResNet50 backbone, U-Net with MobileNet-v2 backbone, U-Net with EfficientNetB0 backbone, and U-Net with DenseNet121 backbone-to segment adenocarcinoma regions in histopathological images of the colon and rectum, which are essentially the various U-Net backbones. The performance of each method was then compared to identify the most effective approach, and subsequently, it was found that the U-Net with DenseNet121 backbone and U-Net with ResNet50 backbone performed better than the rest of the models in terms of accuracy with its respective training accuracy scores being 93.81 % and 93.39 % while the testing accuracy scores were 90.21 % and 89.81 %, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"266 ","pages":"155820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2025.155820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Adenocarcinoma, the most prevalent type of colorectal cancer, makes up roughly 95 % of all cases and is associated with a notably high mortality rate. Owing to the various risk factors which might include personal choices and habits or genetic factors, the risk of developing the cancer for every individual might vary. However, given the statistics, the rate of acquiring the disease is pretty high. Therefore, based on the need for early detection and diagnosis of the disease, there is a pressing demand for an automated system to accurately identify adenocarcinoma in the colorectal region by utilizing the concept of binary segmentation wherein two classes are employed to indicate the presence as well as the absence of the condition. To address this, the project explored several deep learning-based segmentation methods-such as U-Net, Attention U-Net, U-Net with ResNet50 backbone, U-Net with MobileNet-v2 backbone, U-Net with EfficientNetB0 backbone, and U-Net with DenseNet121 backbone-to segment adenocarcinoma regions in histopathological images of the colon and rectum, which are essentially the various U-Net backbones. The performance of each method was then compared to identify the most effective approach, and subsequently, it was found that the U-Net with DenseNet121 backbone and U-Net with ResNet50 backbone performed better than the rest of the models in terms of accuracy with its respective training accuracy scores being 93.81 % and 93.39 % while the testing accuracy scores were 90.21 % and 89.81 %, respectively.
期刊介绍:
Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.