Shifting Paradigms: A Deep Dive Into Public Perceptions of Gender-affirming Surgery.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-01-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006472
Justin M Camacho, Michael Alfertshofer, Heli S Patel, Daniel Najafali, Noelle Thompson, Victoria Stoffel, Chris M Reid, Michael Alperovich, Samuel Knoedler, Leonard Knoedler
{"title":"Shifting Paradigms: A Deep Dive Into Public Perceptions of Gender-affirming Surgery.","authors":"Justin M Camacho, Michael Alfertshofer, Heli S Patel, Daniel Najafali, Noelle Thompson, Victoria Stoffel, Chris M Reid, Michael Alperovich, Samuel Knoedler, Leonard Knoedler","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the growing demand for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in recent years, it is essential to explore the public perceptions of GAS. Understanding the public's opinions and attitudes toward GAS will provide valuable insights for shaping educational initiatives to enhance public knowledge and awareness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used the Prolific Academic platform to distribute an online survey among adult participants residing in the United States in August 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1005 completed survey responses, 50% of respondents were 41 years of age or older, 51% were women, and 73% were White. A total of 18% identified as part of the LGBTQIA+ community, and most (37%) resided in the southern United States. The majority of participants (78%) did not personally know anyone who underwent GAS, and 74% believed that plastic surgeons mainly perform GAS. Only 22% felt healthcare professionals were well qualified to provide gender-affirming care. Media's effect on GAS acceptance was assessed to be mostly negative (33%) or very negative (12%). About 33% favored both public and private health insurance coverage for GAS, whereas 35% opposed insurance coverage. Most respondents strongly agreed (32% and 34%) or agreed (33% and 37%) that GAS aligns with gender identity and improves mental health. Regarding minimum age, most partakers (43%) supported 18 years, whereas 38% endorsed 21 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study sheds light on the public perceptions of GAS. These insights underscore the need for targeted educational efforts to increase awareness, rectify misconceptions, and promote a deeper understanding of GAS within society.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11749661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006472","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given the growing demand for gender-affirming surgery (GAS) in recent years, it is essential to explore the public perceptions of GAS. Understanding the public's opinions and attitudes toward GAS will provide valuable insights for shaping educational initiatives to enhance public knowledge and awareness.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used the Prolific Academic platform to distribute an online survey among adult participants residing in the United States in August 2023.

Results: Of 1005 completed survey responses, 50% of respondents were 41 years of age or older, 51% were women, and 73% were White. A total of 18% identified as part of the LGBTQIA+ community, and most (37%) resided in the southern United States. The majority of participants (78%) did not personally know anyone who underwent GAS, and 74% believed that plastic surgeons mainly perform GAS. Only 22% felt healthcare professionals were well qualified to provide gender-affirming care. Media's effect on GAS acceptance was assessed to be mostly negative (33%) or very negative (12%). About 33% favored both public and private health insurance coverage for GAS, whereas 35% opposed insurance coverage. Most respondents strongly agreed (32% and 34%) or agreed (33% and 37%) that GAS aligns with gender identity and improves mental health. Regarding minimum age, most partakers (43%) supported 18 years, whereas 38% endorsed 21 years.

Conclusions: This study sheds light on the public perceptions of GAS. These insights underscore the need for targeted educational efforts to increase awareness, rectify misconceptions, and promote a deeper understanding of GAS within society.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变范式:深入了解公众对性别确认手术的看法。
背景:鉴于近年来对性别确认手术(GAS)的需求不断增长,有必要探讨公众对GAS的看法。了解公众对气体排放的意见和态度,将为制定教育计划提供宝贵的见解,以提高公众的知识和意识。方法:这项横断面研究使用高产学术平台,于2023年8月在居住在美国的成年参与者中分发在线调查。结果:在1005份完整的调查回复中,50%的受访者年龄在41岁或以上,51%是女性,73%是白人。总共有18%的人被认为是LGBTQIA+社区的一部分,其中大多数(37%)居住在美国南部。大多数参与者(78%)不认识任何做过GAS手术的人,74%的人认为整形外科医生主要做GAS手术。只有22%的人认为医疗保健专业人员完全有资格提供性别确认护理。媒体对GAS接受度的影响主要是负面的(33%)或非常负面的(12%)。大约33%的人支持将公共和私人医疗保险覆盖到GAS,而35%的人反对。大多数受访者强烈同意(32%和34%)或同意(33%和37%)GAS符合性别认同并改善心理健康。在最低年龄方面,大多数参与者(43%)支持18岁,38%支持21岁。结论:这项研究揭示了公众对天然气的看法。这些见解强调了有针对性的教育工作的必要性,以提高认识,纠正错误观念,并促进社会对GAS的更深入理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
期刊最新文献
Multidetector-row Computed Tomography Analysis of the Radial Midpalmar Flap: A Retrospective Anatomical Study. Recent Advancements in Robotic-assisted Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review. Reverse Fragility Index in Plastic Surgery Randomized Controlled Trials. Transtemporal Endoscopic Deep Plane Face Lift. Utilization of Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty and Arthrodesis in the United States From 2010 to 2019.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1