Taking the Next Step in Neurologic Rehabilitation: Contributions of Intensity and Variability of Stepping Tasks during Locomotor Training.

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzaf005
T George Hornby, Jennifer Moore, Carey L Holleran, Christopher E Henderson
{"title":"Taking the Next Step in Neurologic Rehabilitation: Contributions of Intensity and Variability of Stepping Tasks during Locomotor Training.","authors":"T George Hornby, Jennifer Moore, Carey L Holleran, Christopher E Henderson","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research over the past 20 years indicates the amount of task-specific walking practice provided to individuals with stroke, brain injury, or incomplete spinal cord injury can strongly influence walking recovery. However, more recent data suggest that attention towards 2 other training parameters, including the intensity and variability of walking practice, may maximize walking recovery and facilitate gains in non-walking outcomes. The combination of these training parameters represents a stark contrast from traditional strategies, and confusion regarding the potential benefits and perceived risks may limit their implementation in clinical practice. The purpose of this perspective is to delineate the evidence regarding the contributions of intensity and variability of locomotor training to improve mobility outcomes in individuals with acute-onset brain and spinal cord injury. The rationale and evidence supporting the utility of these training parameters in controlled laboratory settings is first described by integrating concepts in the field of neuroscience, motor learning, biomechanics, and exercise physiology into a rehabilitation intervention. Subsequently, the evidence supporting the efficacy of this paradigm is addressed, including discussions of some of the misconceptions regarding perceived negative consequences of these strategies in an effort to mitigate common clinical concerns. Finally, the utility of these strategies implemented during inpatient rehabilitation is delineated to facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and potential benefits early following neurologic injury. A greater understanding of how and why to integrate higher intensity, variable stepping practice will support therapists to take the next step to maximize mobility in the patients they serve.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research over the past 20 years indicates the amount of task-specific walking practice provided to individuals with stroke, brain injury, or incomplete spinal cord injury can strongly influence walking recovery. However, more recent data suggest that attention towards 2 other training parameters, including the intensity and variability of walking practice, may maximize walking recovery and facilitate gains in non-walking outcomes. The combination of these training parameters represents a stark contrast from traditional strategies, and confusion regarding the potential benefits and perceived risks may limit their implementation in clinical practice. The purpose of this perspective is to delineate the evidence regarding the contributions of intensity and variability of locomotor training to improve mobility outcomes in individuals with acute-onset brain and spinal cord injury. The rationale and evidence supporting the utility of these training parameters in controlled laboratory settings is first described by integrating concepts in the field of neuroscience, motor learning, biomechanics, and exercise physiology into a rehabilitation intervention. Subsequently, the evidence supporting the efficacy of this paradigm is addressed, including discussions of some of the misconceptions regarding perceived negative consequences of these strategies in an effort to mitigate common clinical concerns. Finally, the utility of these strategies implemented during inpatient rehabilitation is delineated to facilitate a more comprehensive understanding of the feasibility and potential benefits early following neurologic injury. A greater understanding of how and why to integrate higher intensity, variable stepping practice will support therapists to take the next step to maximize mobility in the patients they serve.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在神经系统康复中迈出下一步:运动训练中步进任务的强度和变异性的贡献。
过去20年的研究表明,为中风、脑损伤或不完全性脊髓损伤患者提供的特定任务步行练习量可以强烈影响步行恢复。然而,最近的数据表明,对其他两个训练参数的关注,包括步行练习的强度和可变性,可能会最大限度地恢复步行并促进非步行结果的获得。这些训练参数的组合与传统策略形成鲜明对比,对潜在益处和感知风险的混淆可能会限制其在临床实践中的实施。这一观点的目的是描述关于运动训练强度和可变性对改善急性脑和脊髓损伤患者活动结果的贡献的证据。首先,通过将神经科学、运动学习、生物力学和运动生理学领域的概念整合到康复干预中,描述了在受控实验室环境中支持这些训练参数效用的基本原理和证据。随后,对支持该模式有效性的证据进行了讨论,包括对这些策略的感知负面后果的一些误解的讨论,以减轻常见的临床问题。最后,本文描述了在住院康复期间实施这些策略的效用,以便更全面地了解神经损伤后早期实施这些策略的可行性和潜在益处。更好地理解如何以及为什么要整合高强度、可变步进练习,将有助于治疗师采取下一步措施,最大限度地提高他们所服务患者的活动能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Gait Speed Modifies Efficacy of Home-Based Exercise for Falls in Older Adults with a Previous Fall: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Association between Physical Therapists' Attitudes and Beliefs and the Functional Outcomes of Patients with Low Back Pain: A Multilevel Analysis Study. Effectiveness of Additional or Standalone Corticosteroid Injections Compared to Physical Therapist Interventions in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Monitoring Treatment Fidelity in a Pragmatic Pediatric Rehabilitation Trial Comparing Two Physical Therapy Schedules: Analysis and Unexpected Findings. Taking the Next Step in Neurologic Rehabilitation: Contributions of Intensity and Variability of Stepping Tasks during Locomotor Training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1