[How to report the end-of-life decisions in the clinical record? Proposal of an "ABCD".]

Q3 Medicine Recenti progressi in medicina Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1701/4416.44116
Luigi Riccioni
{"title":"[How to report the end-of-life decisions in the clinical record? Proposal of an \"ABCD\".]","authors":"Luigi Riccioni","doi":"10.1701/4416.44116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coping with the end of life decision making process in ICU, its complexity adds a challenge for the healthcare team: how to report in the medical record the events and reasoning that led to withholding or withdrawing treatments shifting from intensive to palliative care. Each healthcare team must select the best approach for managing the decision-making process and the necessary rules to ensure a correct clinical history narrative, indicating who must write and what has to be written. Taking into account the team organization, the report may be written not necessarily by the ICU director, but also by a staff physician as a spokesperson in the individual case. Regardless of the variability of each case, four points must be necessarily recorded recalling them with the first four letters of the alphabet (A, B, C, D) for an easier memorization: A= Anamnesis (clinical summary); B= Balancing (remodulation of care); C= Collegiality (sharing of decisions); D= Dialogue (conversation with the patient and/or family members).</p>","PeriodicalId":20887,"journal":{"name":"Recenti progressi in medicina","volume":"116 1","pages":"42-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recenti progressi in medicina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1701/4416.44116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coping with the end of life decision making process in ICU, its complexity adds a challenge for the healthcare team: how to report in the medical record the events and reasoning that led to withholding or withdrawing treatments shifting from intensive to palliative care. Each healthcare team must select the best approach for managing the decision-making process and the necessary rules to ensure a correct clinical history narrative, indicating who must write and what has to be written. Taking into account the team organization, the report may be written not necessarily by the ICU director, but also by a staff physician as a spokesperson in the individual case. Regardless of the variability of each case, four points must be necessarily recorded recalling them with the first four letters of the alphabet (A, B, C, D) for an easier memorization: A= Anamnesis (clinical summary); B= Balancing (remodulation of care); C= Collegiality (sharing of decisions); D= Dialogue (conversation with the patient and/or family members).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何在临床记录中报告临终决定?“ABCD”的建议。]
在ICU中应对临终决策过程,其复杂性给医疗团队带来了挑战:如何在医疗记录中报告导致暂停或撤销治疗的事件和原因,从强化治疗转向姑息治疗。每个医疗团队必须选择管理决策过程的最佳方法和必要的规则,以确保正确的临床病史叙述,指示谁必须写和必须写什么。考虑到团队组织,报告可能不一定由ICU主任撰写,也可能由一名工作医师作为个案发言人撰写。无论每个病例的可变性如何,为了更容易记忆,必须记录四个点,用字母表的前四个字母(A, B, C, D)回忆它们:A=记忆(临床总结);B=平衡(调整);C=同僚关系(共同决策);D=对话(与病人和/或家属的对话)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Recenti progressi in medicina
Recenti progressi in medicina Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Giunta ormai al sessantesimo anno, Recenti Progressi in Medicina continua a costituire un sicuro punto di riferimento ed uno strumento di lavoro fondamentale per l"ampliamento dell"orizzonte culturale del medico italiano. Recenti Progressi in Medicina è una rivista di medicina interna. Ciò significa il recupero di un"ottica globale e integrata, idonea ad evitare sia i particolarismi della informazione specialistica sia la frammentazione di quella generalista.
期刊最新文献
["For their own good". Medical assistance in dying: a right for whom?] [Access requirements for medically assisted death: an open question.] [CAR-T therapy in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Clinical case of the San Martino Hospital in Genoa.] [Clinical decision rules for chest pain in primary care are supported by weak evidence and are difficult to apply.] [Continuous beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction: fewer hospitalizations, but no effect on mortality or major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1