Wild recognition: conducting the mark test for mirror self-recognition on wild baboons.

IF 3.8 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1098/rspb.2024.1933
Esa A Ahmad, Helen Reiderman, Elise Huchard, Axelle Delaunay, Vittoria Roatti, Guy Cowlishaw, Alecia Carter
{"title":"Wild recognition: conducting the mark test for mirror self-recognition on wild baboons.","authors":"Esa A Ahmad, Helen Reiderman, Elise Huchard, Axelle Delaunay, Vittoria Roatti, Guy Cowlishaw, Alecia Carter","doi":"10.1098/rspb.2024.1933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The distribution of self-awareness across species is important to understand, not only as a matter of scientific interest but also because of its implications for the ethical standing of non-human animals. The prevailing methodology for determining self-awareness is to test for visual self-recognition using mirror-image stimulation and a 'mark test'. However, most studies have involved very small sample sizes, omitted a control condition and been conducted on captive animals. Here, we designed and implemented the first controlled mark test in a wild setting, conducting the mark test using a laser pointer on a large (<i>n</i> = 51 individuals, 135 mark tests) sample of wild chacma baboons (<i>Papio ursinus</i>) <i>in situ</i>. Control tests showed that baboons were interested in the mark, but this interest decreased with age, and was greater in males and towards green (cf. red) marks. However, as predicted, subjects showed no evidence of visual self-recognition, which, given the control, cannot be attributed to a lack of motivation in the mark. Our study proposes a novel, controlled mark test <i>in situ</i> and contributes to the evidence that, without extensive training, non-hominid primates are not capable of full visual self-recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20589,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"292 2039","pages":"20241933"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750390/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.1933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The distribution of self-awareness across species is important to understand, not only as a matter of scientific interest but also because of its implications for the ethical standing of non-human animals. The prevailing methodology for determining self-awareness is to test for visual self-recognition using mirror-image stimulation and a 'mark test'. However, most studies have involved very small sample sizes, omitted a control condition and been conducted on captive animals. Here, we designed and implemented the first controlled mark test in a wild setting, conducting the mark test using a laser pointer on a large (n = 51 individuals, 135 mark tests) sample of wild chacma baboons (Papio ursinus) in situ. Control tests showed that baboons were interested in the mark, but this interest decreased with age, and was greater in males and towards green (cf. red) marks. However, as predicted, subjects showed no evidence of visual self-recognition, which, given the control, cannot be attributed to a lack of motivation in the mark. Our study proposes a novel, controlled mark test in situ and contributes to the evidence that, without extensive training, non-hominid primates are not capable of full visual self-recognition.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
野生识别:对野生狒狒进行镜像自我识别的标记测试。
了解物种间自我意识的分布是很重要的,这不仅是科学兴趣的问题,而且因为它对非人类动物的伦理地位也有影响。确定自我意识的流行方法是使用镜像刺激和“标记测试”来测试视觉自我识别。然而,大多数研究涉及的样本量很小,省略了控制条件,并且是在圈养动物身上进行的。在这里,我们设计并实施了第一个野生环境下的对照标记测试,使用激光笔在大量(n = 51只,135次标记测试)野生chacma狒狒(Papio ursinus)原位样本上进行标记测试。对照试验表明,狒狒对标记感兴趣,但这种兴趣随着年龄的增长而下降,雄性狒狒对绿色标记更感兴趣(参照红色标记)。然而,正如预测的那样,受试者没有表现出视觉自我识别的证据,考虑到控制,这不能归因于标记缺乏动机。我们的研究提出了一种新颖的、受控的标记原位测试,并提供了证据,证明如果没有广泛的训练,非原始人灵长类动物无法完全进行视觉自我识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.30%
发文量
502
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Proceedings B is the Royal Society’s flagship biological research journal, accepting original articles and reviews of outstanding scientific importance and broad general interest. The main criteria for acceptance are that a study is novel, and has general significance to biologists. Articles published cover a wide range of areas within the biological sciences, many have relevance to organisms and the environments in which they live. The scope includes, but is not limited to, ecology, evolution, behavior, health and disease epidemiology, neuroscience and cognition, behavioral genetics, development, biomechanics, paleontology, comparative biology, molecular ecology and evolution, and global change biology.
期刊最新文献
Do you remember? Within-generation and transgenerational heat stress memory of recurring marine heatwaves in threespine stickleback. Does literature evolve one funeral at a time? Human pressures threaten diet-specialized mammal communities. Exotic cuticular specializations in a Cambrian scalidophoran. New insights on sea turtle behaviour during the 'lost years'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1