Late modern war and the geos: The ecological 'beforemaths' of advanced military technologies.

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Security Dialogue Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1177/09670106241265636
Mark Griffiths, Kali Rubaii
{"title":"Late modern war and the <i>geos</i>: The ecological 'beforemaths' of advanced military technologies.","authors":"Mark Griffiths, Kali Rubaii","doi":"10.1177/09670106241265636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article develops the idea that late modern war's relationship with the <i>geos</i> (the ground and the life it sustains) is doubly destructive. While part of this is recognized in a recent focus on slow violence and ecological aftermaths, there is little consideration of the 'beforemath', or the sites of extraction that make advanced military technologies possible. Drawing attention to mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the article connects military technologies to arms manufacturers and their use of extracted minerals (e.g. cobalt, tantalum, copper, uranium). Shared patterns of environmental and public health effects across parts of Iraq, Gaza and the DRC indicate the doubly destructive nature of late modern war's relationship with the <i>geos</i>: toxic materials threaten life <i>after</i> war as the deposits of bombardment and <i>before</i> war as mineral commodities at the beginning of arms supply chains. The article explicates how a perspective from the beforemath radically refigures the ways we think about war and spatiality, temporality, and the range of bodies affected in ways that promise a fuller understanding of the violence distributed by practices of late modern war.</p>","PeriodicalId":21670,"journal":{"name":"Security Dialogue","volume":"56 1","pages":"38-57"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11735307/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Security Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09670106241265636","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article develops the idea that late modern war's relationship with the geos (the ground and the life it sustains) is doubly destructive. While part of this is recognized in a recent focus on slow violence and ecological aftermaths, there is little consideration of the 'beforemath', or the sites of extraction that make advanced military technologies possible. Drawing attention to mining in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), the article connects military technologies to arms manufacturers and their use of extracted minerals (e.g. cobalt, tantalum, copper, uranium). Shared patterns of environmental and public health effects across parts of Iraq, Gaza and the DRC indicate the doubly destructive nature of late modern war's relationship with the geos: toxic materials threaten life after war as the deposits of bombardment and before war as mineral commodities at the beginning of arms supply chains. The article explicates how a perspective from the beforemath radically refigures the ways we think about war and spatiality, temporality, and the range of bodies affected in ways that promise a fuller understanding of the violence distributed by practices of late modern war.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代晚期战争和地理:先进军事技术的生态“前数学”。
这篇文章发展了这样一种观点,即现代晚期战争与地理(地面及其维持的生命)的关系具有双重破坏性。虽然最近对缓慢暴力和生态后果的关注部分认识到了这一点,但很少考虑“前数学”,或使先进军事技术成为可能的提取地点。文章将军事技术与武器制造商及其对提取矿物(如钴、钽、铜、铀)的使用联系起来,提请人们注意刚果民主共和国(DRC)的采矿业。在伊拉克、加沙和刚果民主共和国部分地区,环境和公共卫生影响的共同模式表明,现代晚期战争与地质环境的关系具有双重破坏性:有毒物质在战争后作为轰炸的沉积物威胁生命,而在战争前作为武器供应链起点的矿产商品威胁生命。这篇文章阐述了前数学的观点是如何从根本上重新塑造了我们对战争、空间性、时间性和受影响的身体范围的看法,从而使我们对现代战争后期的暴力行为有了更全面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Security Dialogue
Security Dialogue INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Security Dialogue is a fully peer-reviewed and highly ranked international bi-monthly journal that seeks to combine contemporary theoretical analysis with challenges to public policy across a wide ranging field of security studies. Security Dialogue seeks to revisit and recast the concept of security through new approaches and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Late modern war and the geos: The ecological 'beforemaths' of advanced military technologies. Qualifying deportation: How police translation of 'dangerous foreign criminals' led to expansive deportation practices in Spain. Insecurity, deportability and authority ‘My body is my piece of land’: Indebted deportation among undocumented migrant sex workers from Thailand and Nigeria in Europe ‘Women helping women’: Deploying gender in US counterinsurgency wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1