Considerations and experiences with healthcare-seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1080/02813432.2025.2452924
Isabella Raasthøj Holst, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Peter Haastrup, Sonja Wehberg, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl
{"title":"Considerations and experiences with healthcare-seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark.","authors":"Isabella Raasthøj Holst, Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Gitte Bruun Lauridsen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam, Peter Haastrup, Sonja Wehberg, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2025.2452924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To (1) examine considerations before and experiences with GP contact during the first COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown among Danish citizens; (2) analyse the associations with sex, age, chronic disease, and socioeconomic factors; and (3) explore changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour post-pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of 100,000 Danes aged 20 years or older, randomly selected in the general population, were invited to participate in a survey examining considerations and experiences with healthcare seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Data were collected in spring 2022 and linked to register data on socioeconomic factors. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 27,369 eligible individuals, 18% reported a need to contact their GP. Being worried about burdening the healthcare system was most frequently reported (45%), followed by being in doubt about acceptable contact reasons (33%), and concern about infection (24%). Although 44% of those who needed to contact their GP found the digital solutions advantageous, individuals frequently found it difficult to discuss symptoms by telehealth (29%) and that they were examined less thoroughly. Generally, women, younger people, and individuals with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to be worried and report difficulties with contact to general practice. Some 86% of the respondents reported no changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour post-pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results may assist in the organisation of healthcare in case of future lockdowns. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic has only slightly affected the healthcare-seeking behaviour in the Danish general population.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2025.2452924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To (1) examine considerations before and experiences with GP contact during the first COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown among Danish citizens; (2) analyse the associations with sex, age, chronic disease, and socioeconomic factors; and (3) explore changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour post-pandemic.

Method: A total of 100,000 Danes aged 20 years or older, randomly selected in the general population, were invited to participate in a survey examining considerations and experiences with healthcare seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Data were collected in spring 2022 and linked to register data on socioeconomic factors. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression models were applied.

Results: Of the 27,369 eligible individuals, 18% reported a need to contact their GP. Being worried about burdening the healthcare system was most frequently reported (45%), followed by being in doubt about acceptable contact reasons (33%), and concern about infection (24%). Although 44% of those who needed to contact their GP found the digital solutions advantageous, individuals frequently found it difficult to discuss symptoms by telehealth (29%) and that they were examined less thoroughly. Generally, women, younger people, and individuals with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to be worried and report difficulties with contact to general practice. Some 86% of the respondents reported no changes in healthcare-seeking behaviour post-pandemic.

Conclusion: The results may assist in the organisation of healthcare in case of future lockdowns. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic has only slightly affected the healthcare-seeking behaviour in the Danish general population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在丹麦首次COVID-19封锁期间寻求医疗保健的考虑和经验。
目的:(1)研究丹麦公民在首次冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)封锁期间与全科医生接触之前的考虑因素和经验;(2)分析与性别、年龄、慢性病和社会经济因素的关系;(3)探讨大流行后求医行为的变化。方法:从普通人群中随机抽取10万名20岁及以上的丹麦人,参与一项调查,调查在首次COVID-19封锁期间就医的考虑和经验。数据于2022年春季收集,并与社会经济因素的登记数据相关联。采用描述性统计和多变量logistic回归模型。结果:在27,369名符合条件的个人中,18%的人报告需要联系他们的全科医生。最常见的报告是担心给医疗保健系统增加负担(45%),其次是怀疑可接受的接触原因(33%),以及担心感染(24%)。尽管需要联系全科医生的人中有44%认为数字解决方案是有利的,但个人经常发现很难通过远程医疗讨论症状(29%),而且他们的检查不太彻底。一般来说,女性、年轻人和社会经济地位较低的人更有可能担心,并报告与全科医生联系有困难。约86%的答复者报告大流行后寻求医疗保健的行为没有变化。结论:本研究结果可为今后疫情防控工作提供参考。然而,2019冠状病毒病大流行对丹麦普通人群的就医行为只产生了轻微影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes - the 'forgotten' diabetes complication: a narrative review. Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation 2 (SCORE2), arterial stiffness, and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in a population-based study. Exercise capacity after long-term physical activity on prescription provided by physiotherapists. General practitioners' clinical decision-making in patients that could have cancer: a vignette study comparing the Baltic states with four Nordic countries. Considerations and experiences with healthcare-seeking during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1