Epigenetics in Learning and Memory.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Sub-cellular biochemistry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-75980-2_2
Brigitte van Zundert, Martin Montecino
{"title":"Epigenetics in Learning and Memory.","authors":"Brigitte van Zundert, Martin Montecino","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-75980-2_2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In animals, memory formation and recall are essential for their survival and for adaptations to a complex and often dynamically changing environment. During memory formation, experiences prompt the activation of a selected and sparse population of cells (engram cells) that undergo persistent physical and/or chemical changes allowing long-term memory formation, which can last for decades. Over the past few decades, important progress has been made on elucidating signaling mechanisms by which synaptic transmission leads to the induction of activity-dependent gene regulation programs during the different phases of learning (acquisition, consolidation, and recall). But what are the molecular mechanisms that govern the expression of immediate-early genes (IEGs; c-fos, Npas4) and plasticity-related genes (PRGs; Dlg4/PSD95 and Grin2b/NR2B) in memory ensemble? Studies in relatively simple in vitro and in vivo neuronal model systems have demonstrated that synaptic activity during development, or when induced by chemical stimuli (i.e., cLTP, KCl, picrotoxin), activates the NMDAR-Ca<sup>2+</sup>-CREB signaling pathway that upregulates gene expression through changes in the epigenetic landscape (i.e., histone marks and DNA methylation) and/or 3D chromatin organization. The data support a model in which epigenetic modifications in promoters and enhancers facilitate the priming and activation of these regulatory regions, hence leading to the formation of enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) through chromatin looping. The exploration of whether similar molecular mechanisms drive gene expression in learning and memory has presented notable challenges due to the distinct phases of learning and the activation of only sparse population of cells (the engram). Consequently, such studies demand precise temporal and spatial control. By combining activity-dependent engram tagging strategies (i.e., TRAP mice) with multi-omics analyses (i.e., RNA-seq, ChiP-seq, ATAC-seq, and Hi-C), it has been recently possible to associate changes in the epigenomic landscape and/or 3D genome architecture with transcriptional waves in engram cells of mice subjected to contextual fear conditioning (CFC), a relevant one-shot Pavlovian learning task. These studies support the role of specific epigenetic mechanisms and of the 3D chromatin organization during the control of gene transcription waves in engram cells. Advancements in our comprehension of the molecular mechanisms driving memory ensemble will undoubtedly play a crucial role in the development of better-targeted strategies to tackle cognitive diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia, among other information-processing disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":21991,"journal":{"name":"Sub-cellular biochemistry","volume":"108 ","pages":"51-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sub-cellular biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75980-2_2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In animals, memory formation and recall are essential for their survival and for adaptations to a complex and often dynamically changing environment. During memory formation, experiences prompt the activation of a selected and sparse population of cells (engram cells) that undergo persistent physical and/or chemical changes allowing long-term memory formation, which can last for decades. Over the past few decades, important progress has been made on elucidating signaling mechanisms by which synaptic transmission leads to the induction of activity-dependent gene regulation programs during the different phases of learning (acquisition, consolidation, and recall). But what are the molecular mechanisms that govern the expression of immediate-early genes (IEGs; c-fos, Npas4) and plasticity-related genes (PRGs; Dlg4/PSD95 and Grin2b/NR2B) in memory ensemble? Studies in relatively simple in vitro and in vivo neuronal model systems have demonstrated that synaptic activity during development, or when induced by chemical stimuli (i.e., cLTP, KCl, picrotoxin), activates the NMDAR-Ca2+-CREB signaling pathway that upregulates gene expression through changes in the epigenetic landscape (i.e., histone marks and DNA methylation) and/or 3D chromatin organization. The data support a model in which epigenetic modifications in promoters and enhancers facilitate the priming and activation of these regulatory regions, hence leading to the formation of enhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) through chromatin looping. The exploration of whether similar molecular mechanisms drive gene expression in learning and memory has presented notable challenges due to the distinct phases of learning and the activation of only sparse population of cells (the engram). Consequently, such studies demand precise temporal and spatial control. By combining activity-dependent engram tagging strategies (i.e., TRAP mice) with multi-omics analyses (i.e., RNA-seq, ChiP-seq, ATAC-seq, and Hi-C), it has been recently possible to associate changes in the epigenomic landscape and/or 3D genome architecture with transcriptional waves in engram cells of mice subjected to contextual fear conditioning (CFC), a relevant one-shot Pavlovian learning task. These studies support the role of specific epigenetic mechanisms and of the 3D chromatin organization during the control of gene transcription waves in engram cells. Advancements in our comprehension of the molecular mechanisms driving memory ensemble will undoubtedly play a crucial role in the development of better-targeted strategies to tackle cognitive diseases, including Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia, among other information-processing disorders.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习和记忆中的表观遗传学。
在动物中,记忆的形成和回忆对它们的生存和适应复杂且经常动态变化的环境至关重要。在记忆形成过程中,经历会促使选定的少量细胞(印迹细胞)激活,这些细胞会经历持续的物理和/或化学变化,从而形成可以持续数十年的长期记忆。在过去的几十年里,在阐明突触传递导致在学习的不同阶段(习得、巩固和回忆)诱导活动依赖的基因调控程序的信号机制方面取得了重要进展。但是控制立即早期基因表达的分子机制是什么?c-fos, Npas4)和可塑性相关基因(PRGs;Dlg4/PSD95和Grin2b/NR2B)内存集成?在相对简单的体外和体内神经元模型系统中进行的研究表明,突触活动在发育过程中,或在化学刺激(如cLTP、KCl、微毒素)诱导下,激活NMDAR-Ca2+-CREB信号通路,通过表观遗传景观(如组蛋白标记和DNA甲基化)和/或3D染色质组织的变化上调基因表达。这些数据支持一个模型,即启动子和增强子中的表观遗传修饰促进了这些调控区域的启动和激活,从而通过染色质环形成增强子-启动子相互作用(EPIs)。由于学习的不同阶段和只有稀疏的细胞群(印迹)的激活,对学习和记忆中是否有相似的分子机制驱动基因表达的探索提出了显著的挑战。因此,这类研究需要精确的时间和空间控制。通过将活动依赖的印迹标记策略(即TRAP小鼠)与多组学分析(即RNA-seq, ChiP-seq, ATAC-seq和Hi-C)相结合,最近有可能将表观基因组景观和/或3D基因组结构的变化与受到情境恐惧条件反射(CFC)的小鼠印迹细胞的转录波联系起来,这是一种相关的一次性巴甫洛学习任务。这些研究支持特定的表观遗传机制和三维染色质组织在印迹细胞基因转录波控制中的作用。我们对驱动记忆集合的分子机制的理解的进步无疑将在开发更有针对性的策略来治疗认知疾病方面发挥关键作用,包括阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆,以及其他信息处理障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sub-cellular biochemistry
Sub-cellular biochemistry Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The book series SUBCELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY is a renowned and well recognized forum for disseminating advances of emerging topics in Cell Biology and related subjects. All volumes are edited by established scientists and the individual chapters are written by experts on the relevant topic. The individual chapters of each volume are fully citable and indexed in Medline/Pubmed to ensure maximum visibility of the work.
期刊最新文献
Basic Epigenetic Mechanisms. Environmental Enrichment and Epigenetic Changes in the Brain: From the Outside to the Deep Inside. Epigenetic Control in Schizophrenia. Epigenetics in Learning and Memory. Epigenetics in Neurodegenerative Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1