Efficacy of prophylactic laxatives against opioid-induced constipation: retrospective propensity score matching analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09154-w
Yuka Okuda, Toshiyuki Kuriyama, Yoshi Tsukiyama, Toshio Shimokawa, Ke Wan, Tomoyuki Kawamata
{"title":"Efficacy of prophylactic laxatives against opioid-induced constipation: retrospective propensity score matching analysis.","authors":"Yuka Okuda, Toshiyuki Kuriyama, Yoshi Tsukiyama, Toshio Shimokawa, Ke Wan, Tomoyuki Kawamata","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09154-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is problematic for patients with cancer receiving opioid therapy. Some guidelines recommend initiating regular laxatives at the same time as opioid analgesics. However, the effectiveness of prophylactic laxatives on OIC has not been widely demonstrated. We therefore examined the incidence of OIC among patients with and without prophylactic laxatives within one week after initiating strong opioid analgesics and the factors associated with the incidence of OIC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible patients were adults with cancer for whom strong opioid analgesics were initiated after admission and who remained hospitalized for over a week. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare outcomes after adjusting for patient background.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 928 patients were enrolled, from which 536 were selected after propensity score matching analysis. The incidence of OIC in patients with prophylactic laxatives was not significantly different from that without prophylactic laxatives (48.1% vs 48.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-1.36). In multivariable logistic analysis, age ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.19) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 3 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.04-2.77) were associated with a higher incidence of OIC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic laxatives did not affect the incidence of OIC in our study. Our results suggest that prophylactic laxatives are not necessarily required when initiating opioid therapy. In addition, we found that age ≥ 65 years and ECOG PS ≥ 3 were associated in our study with a higher incidence of OIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11750890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09154-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is problematic for patients with cancer receiving opioid therapy. Some guidelines recommend initiating regular laxatives at the same time as opioid analgesics. However, the effectiveness of prophylactic laxatives on OIC has not been widely demonstrated. We therefore examined the incidence of OIC among patients with and without prophylactic laxatives within one week after initiating strong opioid analgesics and the factors associated with the incidence of OIC.

Methods: Eligible patients were adults with cancer for whom strong opioid analgesics were initiated after admission and who remained hospitalized for over a week. Propensity score matching analysis was used to compare outcomes after adjusting for patient background.

Results: In total, 928 patients were enrolled, from which 536 were selected after propensity score matching analysis. The incidence of OIC in patients with prophylactic laxatives was not significantly different from that without prophylactic laxatives (48.1% vs 48.9%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-1.36). In multivariable logistic analysis, age ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.19) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 3 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.04-2.77) were associated with a higher incidence of OIC.

Conclusion: Prophylactic laxatives did not affect the incidence of OIC in our study. Our results suggest that prophylactic laxatives are not necessarily required when initiating opioid therapy. In addition, we found that age ≥ 65 years and ECOG PS ≥ 3 were associated in our study with a higher incidence of OIC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预防性泻药对阿片类药物引起的便秘的疗效:回顾性倾向评分匹配分析。
目的:阿片类药物引起的便秘(OIC)是癌症患者接受阿片类药物治疗的问题。一些指南建议在使用阿片类镇痛药的同时开始使用常规泻药。然而,预防性泻药对OIC的有效性尚未得到广泛证实。因此,我们研究了在开始使用强阿片类镇痛药后一周内使用和不使用预防性泻药的患者的OIC发生率以及与OIC发生率相关的因素。方法:符合条件的患者是成年癌症患者,入院后开始使用强阿片类镇痛药,住院时间超过一周。在调整患者背景后,使用倾向评分匹配分析来比较结果。结果:共纳入928例患者,经倾向评分匹配分析,从中筛选出536例。服用预防性泻药的患者与未服用预防性泻药的患者OIC发生率无显著差异(48.1% vs 48.9%,优势比(OR) = 0.97, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.69-1.36)。在多变量logistic分析中,年龄≥65岁(OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.19)和东部肿瘤合作组表现状态(ECOG PS)≥3 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.04-2.77)与较高的OIC发生率相关。结论:在我们的研究中,预防性泻药对OIC的发生率没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,在开始阿片类药物治疗时,不一定需要预防性泻药。此外,我们发现年龄≥65岁和ECOG PS≥3与OIC的高发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Methodologies and characteristics of studies investigating the cost of the palliative phase of cancer: a systematic review. The citizen perspective on challenges and rehabilitation needs among individuals treated for head and neck cancer: a qualitative study. "The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home. Musculoskeletal symptoms associated with aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of early breast cancer: A scoping review of risk factors and outcomes. Sleep quality in lung cancer and specifically non-small-cell lung cancer: a rapid review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1