Determinants of healthy lifestyle behaviours in colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-03-18 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09315-x
Judith de Vries-Ten Have, Renate M Winkels, Sharon A G Bloemhof, Annelot Zondervan, Iris Krabbenborg, Ellen Kampman, Laura H H Winkens
{"title":"Determinants of healthy lifestyle behaviours in colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review.","authors":"Judith de Vries-Ten Have, Renate M Winkels, Sharon A G Bloemhof, Annelot Zondervan, Iris Krabbenborg, Ellen Kampman, Laura H H Winkens","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09315-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Identifying and selecting determinants of health behaviours is an important step in the design of behaviour change interventions. Many colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience disease- and treatment-related complaints, which may make it difficult to implement behavioural changes. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify determinants of a healthy lifestyle, i.e. dietary behaviours and physical activity, in CRC survivors who finished treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Web of Science, PubMed and PsychINFO, to retrieve quantitative and qualitative studies on determinants of a healthy lifestyle in CRC survivors who finished treatment. Synonyms of the following search terms were used: 'CRC survivors', 'lifestyle', 'physical activity', 'nutrition' and 'determinant'. The level of evidence for each determinant was classified as 'convincing', 'moderately convincing' or 'unconvincing' based on consistency of findings between studies and quality of studies assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-one studies were retrieved of which twenty were classified as 'high-quality studies' and one as 'low-quality study'. Determinants that were convincingly associated with less healthy lifestyle behaviours were smoking, depression, body image distress/consciousness, experiencing pain, dealing with symptoms and bad health status. A good functional status was convincingly associated with more healthy lifestyle behaviours. Determinants with convincing evidence for an association with less or more healthy lifestyle behaviours were time and other priorities, knowledge, motivation, (false) beliefs, perceived and expected outcomes, skills, social support, social norms and influence, access to facilities and equipment and weather.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions for changing health behaviours in CRC survivors who finished treatment could use these determinants to tailor and personalize the intervention to the target group.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 4","pages":"292"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09315-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Identifying and selecting determinants of health behaviours is an important step in the design of behaviour change interventions. Many colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors experience disease- and treatment-related complaints, which may make it difficult to implement behavioural changes. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify determinants of a healthy lifestyle, i.e. dietary behaviours and physical activity, in CRC survivors who finished treatment.

Methods: We searched Web of Science, PubMed and PsychINFO, to retrieve quantitative and qualitative studies on determinants of a healthy lifestyle in CRC survivors who finished treatment. Synonyms of the following search terms were used: 'CRC survivors', 'lifestyle', 'physical activity', 'nutrition' and 'determinant'. The level of evidence for each determinant was classified as 'convincing', 'moderately convincing' or 'unconvincing' based on consistency of findings between studies and quality of studies assessed with the Mixed Methods Appraisal tool.

Results: Twenty-one studies were retrieved of which twenty were classified as 'high-quality studies' and one as 'low-quality study'. Determinants that were convincingly associated with less healthy lifestyle behaviours were smoking, depression, body image distress/consciousness, experiencing pain, dealing with symptoms and bad health status. A good functional status was convincingly associated with more healthy lifestyle behaviours. Determinants with convincing evidence for an association with less or more healthy lifestyle behaviours were time and other priorities, knowledge, motivation, (false) beliefs, perceived and expected outcomes, skills, social support, social norms and influence, access to facilities and equipment and weather.

Conclusion: Interventions for changing health behaviours in CRC survivors who finished treatment could use these determinants to tailor and personalize the intervention to the target group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌幸存者健康生活方式行为的决定因素:系统综述。
目的:确定和选择健康行为的决定因素是设计行为改变干预措施的重要步骤。许多结直肠癌(CRC)幸存者经历了与疾病和治疗相关的投诉,这可能使其难以实施行为改变。在本系统综述中,我们旨在确定完成治疗的结直肠癌幸存者中健康生活方式的决定因素,即饮食行为和身体活动。方法:我们检索Web of Science、PubMed和PsychINFO,检索完成治疗的结直肠癌幸存者健康生活方式决定因素的定量和定性研究。使用了以下搜索词的同义词:“结直肠癌幸存者”、“生活方式”、“身体活动”、“营养”和“决定因素”。根据研究结果的一致性和使用混合方法评估工具评估的研究质量,每个决定因素的证据水平被分类为“令人信服”、“中等可信”或“不令人信服”。结果:检索到21项研究,其中20项为“高质量研究”,1项为“低质量研究”。令人信服地与不健康生活方式行为相关的决定因素是吸烟、抑郁、身体形象困扰/意识、经历疼痛、处理症状和健康状况不佳。良好的功能状态与更健康的生活方式行为有令人信服的联系。具有令人信服证据的决定因素是时间和其他优先事项、知识、动机、(错误)信念、感知和预期结果、技能、社会支持、社会规范和影响、获得设施和设备以及天气。结论:改变结直肠癌幸存者健康行为的干预措施可以利用这些决定因素来针对目标群体定制和个性化干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Coping with primary brain tumors together: a scoping review of dyadic psychosocial interventions. Psycho-oncologists' roles, tasks, and needs regarding requests for assisted suicide - a qualitative interview study on current experiences and future directions. Healthcare professionals' beliefs on promoting physical activity in oncology: a COM-B framework analysis. Beyond breast cancer: mapping unmet needs and advancing an evidence-based framework of survivorship care. The effectiveness of electroacupuncture in the treatment of cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1