Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mental health care.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Print Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.4045/tidsskr.23.0396
Marte C Ørbo, Camilla Larsen, Martin Bystad, Lars Lien
{"title":"Transcranial magnetic stimulation in mental health care.","authors":"Marte C Ørbo, Camilla Larsen, Martin Bystad, Lars Lien","doi":"10.4045/tidsskr.23.0396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which is a neuromodulation therapy for psychiatric disorders, is not widely used in Norway. We aimed to investigate whether doctors in mental health care are familiar with and interested in the method, as well as the reasons for its limited use and the key factors required for its implementation.</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>An anonymous electronic survey questionnaire was distributed to all active members of the Norwegian Psychiatric Association in the autumn of 2022 (n = 1979), consisting of 484 specialty registrars and 1495 specialists. Respondents were asked to provide demographic data in the questionnaire and indicate their level of agreement with specific statements regarding TMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1979 potential respondents, 481 (24.3 %) completed the survey, 295 (61.3 %) of whom were women, 70 (14.6 %) were specialty registrars and 411 (85.4 %) were specialists. All health trusts were represented. A total of 236 out of 481 respondents (49.1 %) reported not being familiar with the modality, while 307 out of 376 (81.6 %) expressed a desire to learn more about it. The limited use of the method was attributed to it being relatively unknown (334/385, 86.8 %), insufficient training of doctors (321/383, 83.8 %) and uncertainty about patient selection for treatment (215/380, 56.6 %). For future implementation, 294/368 respondents (79.9 %) highlighted the need for national clinical guidelines and 299/371 (80.6 %) emphasised the importance of training for doctors.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The results suggest that doctors are interested in the modality but lack knowledge about it. To promote its implementation, the modality should be incorporated into psychiatric training.</p>","PeriodicalId":23123,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.23.0396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which is a neuromodulation therapy for psychiatric disorders, is not widely used in Norway. We aimed to investigate whether doctors in mental health care are familiar with and interested in the method, as well as the reasons for its limited use and the key factors required for its implementation.

Material and method: An anonymous electronic survey questionnaire was distributed to all active members of the Norwegian Psychiatric Association in the autumn of 2022 (n = 1979), consisting of 484 specialty registrars and 1495 specialists. Respondents were asked to provide demographic data in the questionnaire and indicate their level of agreement with specific statements regarding TMS.

Results: Of the 1979 potential respondents, 481 (24.3 %) completed the survey, 295 (61.3 %) of whom were women, 70 (14.6 %) were specialty registrars and 411 (85.4 %) were specialists. All health trusts were represented. A total of 236 out of 481 respondents (49.1 %) reported not being familiar with the modality, while 307 out of 376 (81.6 %) expressed a desire to learn more about it. The limited use of the method was attributed to it being relatively unknown (334/385, 86.8 %), insufficient training of doctors (321/383, 83.8 %) and uncertainty about patient selection for treatment (215/380, 56.6 %). For future implementation, 294/368 respondents (79.9 %) highlighted the need for national clinical guidelines and 299/371 (80.6 %) emphasised the importance of training for doctors.

Interpretation: The results suggest that doctors are interested in the modality but lack knowledge about it. To promote its implementation, the modality should be incorporated into psychiatric training.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅磁刺激在精神卫生保健中的应用
背景:经颅磁刺激(TMS)是一种治疗精神疾病的神经调节疗法,在挪威并没有广泛应用。我们的目的是调查精神卫生保健医生对该方法是否熟悉和感兴趣,以及其有限使用的原因和实施所需的关键因素。材料和方法:于2022年秋季(n = 1979)向挪威精神病学协会的所有活跃成员分发了一份匿名电子调查问卷,其中包括484名专业登记员和1495名专家。受访者被要求在问卷中提供人口统计数据,并表明他们对有关经颅磁刺激的具体陈述的同意程度。结果:1979名潜在调查对象中,完成调查的481人(24.3%),其中女性295人(61.3%),专业注册者70人(14.6%),专科注册者411人(85.4%)。所有保健信托机构都有代表出席。481名受访者中有236名(49.1%)表示不熟悉这种形态,而376名受访者中有307名(81.6%)表示希望进一步了解这种形态。该方法使用有限的原因是其相对不为人知(334/385,86.8%)、医生培训不足(321/383,83.8%)和患者治疗选择不确定(215/380,56.6%)。对于未来的实施,294/368名受访者(79.9%)强调了国家临床指南的必要性,299/371(80.6%)强调了医生培训的重要性。解释:结果表明,医生对该模式感兴趣,但缺乏相关知识。为促进其实施,应将该模式纳入精神病学培训中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening
Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
18.20%
发文量
593
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vi hører hjemme i Pride-paraden. 25. juni-studien: Man vet ikke alltid selv hva man trenger. Vendepunkt i kampen mot rasisme i medisinstudiet. Rettelse: Mangel på veiledere truer studentutveksling. 89 sekunder på midnatt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1