Diagnostic accuracy of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in differentiating between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-27 DOI:10.21037/tcr-2024-2493
Guo-Feng Wu, Rong-Chao Chen, Jing Luo, Ming-Tai Li, Pei Yu, Pan-Xiao Shen, Jia-Ying Luo, Yin-Yin Qin
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in differentiating between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules.","authors":"Guo-Feng Wu, Rong-Chao Chen, Jing Luo, Ming-Tai Li, Pei Yu, Pan-Xiao Shen, Jia-Ying Luo, Yin-Yin Qin","doi":"10.21037/tcr-2024-2493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Currently, traditional blood biomarkers such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) etc. are mostly elevated in the late stage of tumour, and patients have already lost the chance of tumour eradication when the relevant indexes are found to be elevated. Therefore, there is a need for blood biomarkers with higher sensitivity, better specificity, and better accessibility. Folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR<sup>+</sup>CTCs) may have diagnostic value in lung cancer. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of research exploring the efficacy of FR<sup>+</sup>CTCs in screening pulmonary nodules for lung cancer. The aims of this study were to differentiate between lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules using FR<sup>+</sup>CTCs in conjunction with blood markers and to develop a composite diagnostic model for pulmonary nodules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the inclusion and exclusion guidelines, we retrospectively analysed 1,135 patients with pulmonary nodules who underwent tissue biopsy or surgical resection after FR<sup>+</sup>CTC testing, assessed the histopathological findings by a specialised pathologist, and collected and compared demographic characteristics, blood markers, imaging and pathological parameters in malignant and benign patients. The random forest model was used to screen for indicators and to establish a composite index of blood biomarkers. The performance of single factors or the integrated model were estimated by applying receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 612 patients were included in the lung cancer group, predominantly presenting with stage I adenocarcinomas (n=458). The median age was 54 years, and 43.1% of the patients were male. In comparison, 523 patients were included in the benign pulmonary nodules group, with a median age of 53 years and 46.8% male. No significant differences were identified between the two groups with regard to gender or age (P>0.05). The level of FR<sup>+</sup>CTCs in the lung cancer group was significantly higher than that in the benign nodule group (P<0.001). The white blood cell (WBC) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) levels were significantly higher in the lung cancer group than in the benign nodule group (P<0.001 and P=0.01, respectively). FR<sup>+</sup>CTC level was associated with the pathological subtype (P=0.02), WBC (P<0.001), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (P=0.01). In both groups, the FR<sup>+</sup>CTC level was higher in the single-nodule group than in the multiple-nodule group (P=0.002 and P=0.040, respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of FR<sup>+</sup>CTCs for lung cancer at a cutoff of 8.7 FU/3 mL was 61.9% and 75.0%, respectively. Increasing the cutoff to 1.5 times (13.1 FU/3 mL) and 2 times (17.4 FU/3 mL) improved the specificity to 90.8% and 95.6%, respectively. The combination of FR<sup>+</sup>CTCs with WBC, procalcitonin, and LDH resulted in an area under the curve of 0.976 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.910-1.000], a sensitivity of 100.0%, and a specificity of 85.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FR<sup>+</sup>CTC was proven to be a viable blood biomarker for aiding in the early detection of lung cancer. The combined model based on FR<sup>+</sup>CTC showed substantially greater accuracy than did any single biomarker in patients with pulmonary nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"13 12","pages":"6982-6994"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11730451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-2024-2493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Currently, traditional blood biomarkers such as neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA) etc. are mostly elevated in the late stage of tumour, and patients have already lost the chance of tumour eradication when the relevant indexes are found to be elevated. Therefore, there is a need for blood biomarkers with higher sensitivity, better specificity, and better accessibility. Folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells (FR+CTCs) may have diagnostic value in lung cancer. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of research exploring the efficacy of FR+CTCs in screening pulmonary nodules for lung cancer. The aims of this study were to differentiate between lung cancer and benign pulmonary nodules using FR+CTCs in conjunction with blood markers and to develop a composite diagnostic model for pulmonary nodules.

Methods: Based on the inclusion and exclusion guidelines, we retrospectively analysed 1,135 patients with pulmonary nodules who underwent tissue biopsy or surgical resection after FR+CTC testing, assessed the histopathological findings by a specialised pathologist, and collected and compared demographic characteristics, blood markers, imaging and pathological parameters in malignant and benign patients. The random forest model was used to screen for indicators and to establish a composite index of blood biomarkers. The performance of single factors or the integrated model were estimated by applying receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results: A total of 612 patients were included in the lung cancer group, predominantly presenting with stage I adenocarcinomas (n=458). The median age was 54 years, and 43.1% of the patients were male. In comparison, 523 patients were included in the benign pulmonary nodules group, with a median age of 53 years and 46.8% male. No significant differences were identified between the two groups with regard to gender or age (P>0.05). The level of FR+CTCs in the lung cancer group was significantly higher than that in the benign nodule group (P<0.001). The white blood cell (WBC) and cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 (CYFRA21-1) levels were significantly higher in the lung cancer group than in the benign nodule group (P<0.001 and P=0.01, respectively). FR+CTC level was associated with the pathological subtype (P=0.02), WBC (P<0.001), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level (P=0.01). In both groups, the FR+CTC level was higher in the single-nodule group than in the multiple-nodule group (P=0.002 and P=0.040, respectively). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of FR+CTCs for lung cancer at a cutoff of 8.7 FU/3 mL was 61.9% and 75.0%, respectively. Increasing the cutoff to 1.5 times (13.1 FU/3 mL) and 2 times (17.4 FU/3 mL) improved the specificity to 90.8% and 95.6%, respectively. The combination of FR+CTCs with WBC, procalcitonin, and LDH resulted in an area under the curve of 0.976 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.910-1.000], a sensitivity of 100.0%, and a specificity of 85.7%.

Conclusions: FR+CTC was proven to be a viable blood biomarker for aiding in the early detection of lung cancer. The combined model based on FR+CTC showed substantially greater accuracy than did any single biomarker in patients with pulmonary nodules.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞鉴别肺良恶性结节的诊断准确性。
背景:目前,传统的血液生物标志物如神经元特异性烯化酶(NSE)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA)等多在肿瘤晚期升高,当发现相关指标升高时,患者已经失去了肿瘤根除的机会。因此,需要具有更高灵敏度、更好特异性和更好可及性的血液生物标志物。叶酸受体阳性循环肿瘤细胞(FR+ ctc)可能对肺癌有诊断价值。然而,关于FR+ ctc筛查肺癌肺结节的有效性的研究还很缺乏。本研究的目的是利用FR+ ctc结合血液标志物来区分肺癌和良性肺结节,并建立肺结节的复合诊断模型。方法:根据纳入和排除指南,我们回顾性分析了1135例在FR+CTC检测后接受组织活检或手术切除的肺结节患者,由专业病理学家评估组织病理学结果,并收集和比较恶性和良性患者的人口统计学特征、血液标志物、影像学和病理参数。采用随机森林模型筛选指标,建立血液生物标志物综合指数。采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic, ROC)分析评价单因素或综合模型的疗效。结果:肺癌组共纳入612例患者,主要表现为I期腺癌(n=458)。中位年龄54岁,男性占43.1%。良性肺结节组523例,中位年龄53岁,男性46.8%。两组在性别和年龄方面无显著差异(P < 0.05)。肺癌组FR+CTC水平明显高于良性结节组(P+CTC水平与病理亚型相关(P=0.02),单结节组WBC (P+CTC水平分别高于多结节组(P=0.002和P=0.040)。在8.7 FU/3 mL的临界值下,FR+ ctc对肺癌的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为61.9%和75.0%。将临界值提高到1.5倍(13.1 FU/3 mL)和2倍(17.4 FU/3 mL),特异性分别提高到90.8%和95.6%。FR+ ctc联合WBC、降钙素原、LDH的曲线下面积为0.976[95%可信区间(CI): 0.910-1.000],敏感性为100.0%,特异性为85.7%。结论:FR+CTC被证明是一种可行的血液生物标志物,有助于肺癌的早期检测。基于FR+CTC的联合模型在肺结节患者中显示出比任何单一生物标志物更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with head and neck cancer: a multicenter, prospective, observational, real-world study. Slamming hepatocellular carcinoma: targeting immunosuppressive macrophages via SLAMF7 reprograms the tumor microenvironment. Targeting the EZH2-SLFN11 pathway-a lesson in developing molecularly-informed treatments for recurrent small cell lung cancer. The clinicopathological significance of BRI3BP in women with invasive breast cancer. Treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1