Accuracy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Robot-Assisted MRI-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY World neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640
Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Arya Afrooghe, Elham Ahmadi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Rasa Zafari, Amir Reza Bahadori, Mohamed Jalloh, Abbas Tafakhori, Badih Adada, Hamid Borghei-Razavi
{"title":"Accuracy, Effectiveness, and Safety of Robot-Assisted MRI-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Arya Afrooghe, Elham Ahmadi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Rasa Zafari, Amir Reza Bahadori, Mohamed Jalloh, Abbas Tafakhori, Badih Adada, Hamid Borghei-Razavi","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robotic-assisted laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive method for ablating seizure foci and has gained prominence in epilepsy treatment. The use of robotic guidance in these procedures can minimize errors in probe placement, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of robot-assisted LITT for drug-resistant epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till July 7<sup>th</sup>, 2024. Two independent authors performed screening and data extraction. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy, procedure duration, efficacy, and complications of robot-assisted LITT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The results demonstrated that the overall target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.66 (95%CI = 1.23-2.25) with higher precision in frame-based methods (P = 0.02). The mean procedure duration was 5.35 hours (95%CI = 3.69-7.74) and the pooled ablation time was 11.24 minutes (95%CI = 2.78-45.49); both were longer in disconnection surgery compared to the ablative procedure (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In follow-up, 0.58 (95%CI = 0.47-0.69) of patients became seizure-free, and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-0.95) of patients had improvements. Individual patient data analysis showed that robots in LITT are usually used when there are more lesions (P < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robot-assisted LITT offers high precision, positive seizure outcomes, and minimal complications, comparable to non-robotic methods, and is suitable for treating drug-resistant epilepsy with multiple lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"123640"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Robotic-assisted laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive method for ablating seizure foci and has gained prominence in epilepsy treatment. The use of robotic guidance in these procedures can minimize errors in probe placement, potentially leading to better clinical outcomes. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the accuracy, safety, and effectiveness of robot-assisted LITT for drug-resistant epilepsy.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted in Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase till July 7th, 2024. Two independent authors performed screening and data extraction. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine the accuracy, procedure duration, efficacy, and complications of robot-assisted LITT.

Results: Overall, 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses. The results demonstrated that the overall target point localization error (TPLE) was 1.66 (95%CI = 1.23-2.25) with higher precision in frame-based methods (P = 0.02). The mean procedure duration was 5.35 hours (95%CI = 3.69-7.74) and the pooled ablation time was 11.24 minutes (95%CI = 2.78-45.49); both were longer in disconnection surgery compared to the ablative procedure (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In follow-up, 0.58 (95%CI = 0.47-0.69) of patients became seizure-free, and 0.86 (95%CI = 0.72-0.95) of patients had improvements. Individual patient data analysis showed that robots in LITT are usually used when there are more lesions (P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Robot-assisted LITT offers high precision, positive seizure outcomes, and minimal complications, comparable to non-robotic methods, and is suitable for treating drug-resistant epilepsy with multiple lesions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助mri引导激光间质热治疗耐药癫痫的准确性、有效性和安全性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:机器人辅助激光间质热疗法(LITT)是一种微创消融癫痫病灶的方法,在癫痫治疗中得到了突出的应用。在这些过程中使用机器人引导可以最大限度地减少探针放置的错误,可能会带来更好的临床结果。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了机器人辅助LITT治疗耐药癫痫的准确性、安全性和有效性。方法:系统检索截止到2024年7月7日的Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase数据库。两位独立作者进行了筛选和数据提取。进行随机效应荟萃分析以确定机器人辅助LITT的准确性、手术时间、疗效和并发症。结果:总共有11项研究被纳入meta分析。结果表明,基于帧的方法总体目标点定位误差(TPLE)为1.66 (95%CI = 1.23 ~ 2.25),精度较高(P = 0.02)。平均手术时间为5.35小时(95%CI = 3.69 ~ 7.74),合并消融时间为11.24分钟(95%CI = 2.78 ~ 45.49);与消融手术相比,两者在断开手术中的时间都更长(P < 0.001和P < 0.0001)。随访中,0.58例(95%CI = 0.47 ~ 0.69)患者癫痫消失,0.86例(95%CI = 0.72 ~ 0.95)患者病情改善。个体患者数据分析显示,在LITT中,机器人通常在病变较多时使用(P < 0.01)。结论:与非机器人方法相比,机器人辅助的LITT具有高精度、积极的癫痫结果和最小的并发症,适用于治疗多发性病变的耐药癫痫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Hemorrhagic Complications in Deep Brain Stimulation: Microelectrode Recording versus Macrostimulation-Does the Technique Matter? Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Model for Hospital Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Interventional Embolization for Intracranial Aneurysms. Reduced Vertebral Hounsfield Unit Values in the Bridging Group of Ossification-Related Segments in Patients with Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament of the Cervical Spine. The Role of Neuropsychology in the Management of Spinal Cord Injury: A Comprehensive Literature Review. In Reply to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Intersection of Care: Navigating Patient-Hospital Relationships in Neurosurgery".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1