Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-24-00308

Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Brian Hutton, Adrienne Stevens, Joanne E McKenzie, Matthew J Page, David Moher, Jessie McGowan, Sharon E Straus, Tianjing Li, Zachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Heather Colquhoun, Christina Godfrey, Maureen Smith, Janice Tufte, Sherrie Logan, Ferrán Catalá-López, David Tovey, Juan V A Franco, Stephanie Chang, Chantelle Garritty, Lisa Hartling, Tanya Horsley, Etienne V Langlois, Matthew McInnes, Martin Offringa, Vivian Welch, Chris Pritchard, Hanan Khalil, Nicole Mittmann, Micah Peters, Menelaos Konstantinidis, Ellen B M Elsman, Shannon E Kelly, Adrian Aldcroft, Sai Surabi Thirugnanasampanthar, Jasmeen Dourka, Dipika Neupane, George Well, Elie Akl, Michael Wilson, Karla Soares-Weiser, Andrea C Tricco

{"title":"Update to the PRISMA guidelines for network meta-analyses and scoping reviews and development of guidelines for rapid reviews: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Brian Hutton, Adrienne Stevens, Joanne E McKenzie, Matthew J Page, David Moher, Jessie McGowan, Sharon E Straus, Tianjing Li, Zachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Heather Colquhoun, Christina Godfrey, Maureen Smith, Janice Tufte, Sherrie Logan, Ferrán Catalá-López, David Tovey, Juan V A Franco, Stephanie Chang, Chantelle Garritty, Lisa Hartling, Tanya Horsley, Etienne V Langlois, Matthew McInnes, Martin Offringa, Vivian Welch, Chris Pritchard, Hanan Khalil, Nicole Mittmann, Micah Peters, Menelaos Konstantinidis, Ellen B M Elsman, Shannon E Kelly, Adrian Aldcroft, Sai Surabi Thirugnanasampanthar, Jasmeen Dourka, Dipika Neupane, George Well, Elie Akl, Michael Wilson, Karla Soares-Weiser, Andrea C Tricco","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-24-00308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to develop a list of items for potential inclusion in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for network meta-analysis (NMA), scoping reviews (ScRs), and rapid reviews (RRs).Introduction: The PRISMA extensions for NMA and ScRs were published in 2015 and 2018. However, since then, their methodologies and innovations, including automation, have evolved. There is no reporting guideline for RRs. In 2020, an updated PRISMA statement was published, reflecting advances in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. These advances are not yet incorporated into these PRISMA extensions. We will update our previous methods scoping reviews to inform the update of PRISMA-NMA and PRISMA-ScR as well as the development of the PRISMA-RR reporting guidelines.Inclusion criteria: This review will include any study designs evaluating the completeness of reporting, or offering reporting guidance, or assessing methods relevant to NMA, ScRs, or RRs. Editorial guidelines and tutorials that describe items related to reporting completeness will also be eligible.Methods: We will follow the JBI guidance for scoping reviews. For each PRISMA extension, we will (1) search multiple electronic databases from inception, (2) search for unpublished studies, and (3) scan the reference lists of included studies. There will be no language limitations. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by 2 researchers independently. A third researcher will resolve discrepancies. We will conduct frequency analyses of the identified items. The final list of items will be considered for potential inclusion in the relevant PRISMA reporting guidelines.Review registration: NMA protocol (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7BKWY); ScR protocol (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MTA4P); RR protocol (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3JCPE); EQUATOR registration link: https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-systematic-reviews/.","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this scoping review is to develop a list of items for potential inclusion in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines for network meta-analysis (NMA), scoping reviews (ScRs), and rapid reviews (RRs).

Introduction: The PRISMA extensions for NMA and ScRs were published in 2015 and 2018. However, since then, their methodologies and innovations, including automation, have evolved. There is no reporting guideline for RRs. In 2020, an updated PRISMA statement was published, reflecting advances in the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. These advances are not yet incorporated into these PRISMA extensions. We will update our previous methods scoping reviews to inform the update of PRISMA-NMA and PRISMA-ScR as well as the development of the PRISMA-RR reporting guidelines.

Inclusion criteria: This review will include any study designs evaluating the completeness of reporting, or offering reporting guidance, or assessing methods relevant to NMA, ScRs, or RRs. Editorial guidelines and tutorials that describe items related to reporting completeness will also be eligible.

Methods: We will follow the JBI guidance for scoping reviews. For each PRISMA extension, we will (1) search multiple electronic databases from inception, (2) search for unpublished studies, and (3) scan the reference lists of included studies. There will be no language limitations. Screening and data extraction will be conducted by 2 researchers independently. A third researcher will resolve discrepancies. We will conduct frequency analyses of the identified items. The final list of items will be considered for potential inclusion in the relevant PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Review registration: NMA protocol (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7BKWY); ScR protocol (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MTA4P); RR protocol (OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3JCPE); EQUATOR registration link: https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-systematic-reviews/.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

更新PRISMA网络荟萃分析和范围审查指南，制定快速审查指南：范围审查协议。

目的：本范围审查的目的是制定一份项目清单，用于网络荟萃分析（NMA）、范围审查（ScRs）和快速审查（rs）的系统审查和荟萃分析（PRISMA）报告指南中潜在的首选报告项目。介绍：针对NMA和scr的PRISMA扩展分别于2015年和2018年发布。然而，从那时起，他们的方法和创新，包括自动化，已经发展。没有关于rr的报告指南。2020年，发布了更新的PRISMA声明，反映了系统审查的实施和报告方面的进展。这些进步尚未纳入这些PRISMA扩展。我们将更新我们以前的方法范围审查，以通知PRISMA-NMA和PRISMA-ScR的更新以及PRISMA-RR报告指南的制定。纳入标准：本综述将包括评估报告完整性的任何研究设计，或提供报告指导，或评估与NMA、ScRs或rr相关的方法。描述与报告完整性相关项目的编辑指南和教程也将符合条件。方法：我们将按照JBI指南进行范围审查。对于每个PRISMA扩展，我们将(1)从一开始就搜索多个电子数据库，(2)搜索未发表的研究，(3)扫描纳入研究的参考文献列表。没有语言限制。筛选和数据提取将由2名研究人员独立进行。第三位研究人员将解决差异。我们将对已识别的项目进行频率分析。将考虑最终的项目清单是否可能列入有关的PRISMA报告准则。审核注册：NMA协议（OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7BKWY）；ScR协议（OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MTA4P）；RR协议（OSF: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3JCPE）；EQUATOR注册链接：https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-systematic-reviews/。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊