Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 Performance in Answering Patients' Questions About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2024.23697
Puren Gokbulut, Serife Mehlika Kuskonmaz, Cagatay Emir Onder, Isilay Taskaldiran, Gonul Koc
{"title":"Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 Performance in Answering Patients' Questions About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Puren Gokbulut, Serife Mehlika Kuskonmaz, Cagatay Emir Onder, Isilay Taskaldiran, Gonul Koc","doi":"10.14744/SEMB.2024.23697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease with a rising prevalence worldwide. Person-centered treatment factors, including comorbidities and treatment goals, should be considered in determining the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes. ChatGPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a large language model, holds the potential performance in various fields, including medicine. We aimed to examine the reliability, quality, reproducibility, and readability of ChatGPT-4's responses to clinical scenarios about the medical treatment approach and management of type 2 diabetes patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT-4's responses to 24 questions were independently graded by two endocrinologists with clinical experience in endocrinology and resolved by a third reviewer based on the ADA(American Diabetes Association) 2023 guidelines. DISCERN (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information) Measurement Tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses to questions by ChatGPT-4 were fairly consistent in both sessions. No false or misleading information was found in any ChatGPT-4 responses. In terms of reliability, most of the answers showed good (87.5%), followed by excellent (12.5%) reliability. Reading Level was classified as fairly difficult to read (8.3%), difficult to read (50%), and very difficult to read (41.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-4 may have a role as an additional informative tool for type 2 diabetes patients for medical treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":42218,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","volume":"58 4","pages":"483-490"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2024.23697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease with a rising prevalence worldwide. Person-centered treatment factors, including comorbidities and treatment goals, should be considered in determining the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes. ChatGPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a large language model, holds the potential performance in various fields, including medicine. We aimed to examine the reliability, quality, reproducibility, and readability of ChatGPT-4's responses to clinical scenarios about the medical treatment approach and management of type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods: ChatGPT-4's responses to 24 questions were independently graded by two endocrinologists with clinical experience in endocrinology and resolved by a third reviewer based on the ADA(American Diabetes Association) 2023 guidelines. DISCERN (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information) Measurement Tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information.

Results: Responses to questions by ChatGPT-4 were fairly consistent in both sessions. No false or misleading information was found in any ChatGPT-4 responses. In terms of reliability, most of the answers showed good (87.5%), followed by excellent (12.5%) reliability. Reading Level was classified as fairly difficult to read (8.3%), difficult to read (50%), and very difficult to read (41.7%).

Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 may have a role as an additional informative tool for type 2 diabetes patients for medical treatment approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT-4在回答患者关于2型糖尿病管理问题中的作用评价
目的:2型糖尿病是一种全球患病率不断上升的疾病。在确定2型糖尿病的药物治疗时,应考虑以人为中心的治疗因素,包括合并症和治疗目标。ChatGPT-4(生成预训练变压器)是一种大型语言模型,在包括医学在内的各个领域具有潜在的性能。我们的目的是检验ChatGPT-4对2型糖尿病患者药物治疗方法和管理的临床情景反应的可靠性、质量、可重复性和可读性。方法:ChatGPT-4对24个问题的回答由两位具有内分泌学临床经验的内分泌学家独立评分,并由第三位审稿人根据ADA(美国糖尿病协会)2023指南进行解决。使用DISCERN(消费者健康信息质量标准)测量工具来评估信息的可靠性和质量。结果:在两次会议中,ChatGPT-4对问题的回答相当一致。在ChatGPT-4回复中没有发现虚假或误导性信息。在可靠性方面,大部分回答是“好”(87.5%),其次是“优秀”(12.5%)。阅读水平分为相当难读(8.3%)、难读(50%)和非常难读(41.7%)。结论:ChatGPT-4可能作为2型糖尿病患者医学治疗方法的额外信息工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Patients with Respiratory Disorders About Environmental Smoke. Comment on "Performance of AI Models vs. Orthopedic Residents in Turkish Specialty Training Development Exams in Orthopedics". Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care and Brief Overview of the Literature. ChatGPT's Role in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Information: A Critical Assessment. Does Co-Infection with HPV 16 Have a Worse Effect on Cervical Pathology than HPV 16 Alone?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1