Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 Performance in Answering Patients' Questions About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Pub Date : 2024-12-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2024.23697
Puren Gokbulut, Serife Mehlika Kuskonmaz, Cagatay Emir Onder, Isilay Taskaldiran, Gonul Koc
{"title":"Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 Performance in Answering Patients' Questions About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Puren Gokbulut, Serife Mehlika Kuskonmaz, Cagatay Emir Onder, Isilay Taskaldiran, Gonul Koc","doi":"10.14744/SEMB.2024.23697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease with a rising prevalence worldwide. Person-centered treatment factors, including comorbidities and treatment goals, should be considered in determining the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes. ChatGPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a large language model, holds the potential performance in various fields, including medicine. We aimed to examine the reliability, quality, reproducibility, and readability of ChatGPT-4's responses to clinical scenarios about the medical treatment approach and management of type 2 diabetes patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ChatGPT-4's responses to 24 questions were independently graded by two endocrinologists with clinical experience in endocrinology and resolved by a third reviewer based on the ADA(American Diabetes Association) 2023 guidelines. DISCERN (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information) Measurement Tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses to questions by ChatGPT-4 were fairly consistent in both sessions. No false or misleading information was found in any ChatGPT-4 responses. In terms of reliability, most of the answers showed good (87.5%), followed by excellent (12.5%) reliability. Reading Level was classified as fairly difficult to read (8.3%), difficult to read (50%), and very difficult to read (41.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ChatGPT-4 may have a role as an additional informative tool for type 2 diabetes patients for medical treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":42218,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","volume":"58 4","pages":"483-490"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729837/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2024.23697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a disease with a rising prevalence worldwide. Person-centered treatment factors, including comorbidities and treatment goals, should be considered in determining the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes. ChatGPT-4 (Generative Pre-trained Transformer), a large language model, holds the potential performance in various fields, including medicine. We aimed to examine the reliability, quality, reproducibility, and readability of ChatGPT-4's responses to clinical scenarios about the medical treatment approach and management of type 2 diabetes patients.

Methods: ChatGPT-4's responses to 24 questions were independently graded by two endocrinologists with clinical experience in endocrinology and resolved by a third reviewer based on the ADA(American Diabetes Association) 2023 guidelines. DISCERN (Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information) Measurement Tool was used to evaluate the reliability and quality of information.

Results: Responses to questions by ChatGPT-4 were fairly consistent in both sessions. No false or misleading information was found in any ChatGPT-4 responses. In terms of reliability, most of the answers showed good (87.5%), followed by excellent (12.5%) reliability. Reading Level was classified as fairly difficult to read (8.3%), difficult to read (50%), and very difficult to read (41.7%).

Conclusion: ChatGPT-4 may have a role as an additional informative tool for type 2 diabetes patients for medical treatment approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT-4在回答患者关于2型糖尿病管理问题中的作用评价
目的:2型糖尿病是一种全球患病率不断上升的疾病。在确定2型糖尿病的药物治疗时,应考虑以人为中心的治疗因素,包括合并症和治疗目标。ChatGPT-4(生成预训练变压器)是一种大型语言模型,在包括医学在内的各个领域具有潜在的性能。我们的目的是检验ChatGPT-4对2型糖尿病患者药物治疗方法和管理的临床情景反应的可靠性、质量、可重复性和可读性。方法:ChatGPT-4对24个问题的回答由两位具有内分泌学临床经验的内分泌学家独立评分,并由第三位审稿人根据ADA(美国糖尿病协会)2023指南进行解决。使用DISCERN(消费者健康信息质量标准)测量工具来评估信息的可靠性和质量。结果:在两次会议中,ChatGPT-4对问题的回答相当一致。在ChatGPT-4回复中没有发现虚假或误导性信息。在可靠性方面,大部分回答是“好”(87.5%),其次是“优秀”(12.5%)。阅读水平分为相当难读(8.3%)、难读(50%)和非常难读(41.7%)。结论:ChatGPT-4可能作为2型糖尿病患者医学治疗方法的额外信息工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
Drayer Syndrome due to Chromosome 15q26.3 Deletion: Response to Growth Hormone Treatment. Effect of Radiotherapy on the Type and Timing of Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients. Endovascular Treatment in Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Experience from Two Centers. Evaluation of ChatGPT-4 Performance in Answering Patients' Questions About the Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Adipsin and Leptin Levels in Type 2 Diabetic Patients on Sitagliptin and Metformin Versus Metformin Therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1