Hunger Strikes After Restricted Housing Reform.

Abstract

Hunger strikes are a common occurrence in carceral settings accompanied by serious health risks and intensive health care utilization. A 2017 study on hunger strikes within the New Jersey Department of Corrections found these events most often occurred in a disciplinary setting. We undertook this study after a new state law, the Isolated Confinement Restriction Act (ICRA), improved conditions of confinement in part by reducing the utilization, nature, and duration of disciplinary housing. We hypothesized that ICRA would reduce the frequency of hunger strikes. Although the frequency of strikes was unchanged, the mean hunger strike duration declined from 28.9 days to 9.7 days (p = .034). The typical strike was modestly briefer, with the median duration before ICRA being four days and after being three days. The rate of hunger strikes greater than three days declined (from 60.3% to 45.2%; p = .049). There was no difference in the rate of hunger striking in disciplinary housing before or after ICRA. Although hunger strikes remain a frequently used method of protest for incarcerated persons, reform to the conditions of confinement was associated with reducing the health-related dangers and associated health care costs of these phenomena and arguably was a factor in this reduction.