Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664
Solomon S Marrye, Simangele Shakwane
{"title":"Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia.","authors":"Solomon S Marrye, Simangele Shakwane","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A lack of awareness, poor quality of care, and gender inequalities are factors associated with access and utilisation of leprosy services.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors affecting community access and utilisation of leprosy services in high-burden districts of Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A community-based cross-sectional study design was utilised and a simple random sampling technique was used to recruit study respondents. One hundred and sixty-one respondents completed the self-administered structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors associated with leprosy services. A <i>p</i>-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>More than 75% (<i>n</i> = 123) of study respondents had limited knowledge about leprosy. However, respondents who reside in urban areas were knowledgeable about the disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6, 42.0). Men were most likely to use health care facilities (AOR [95% CI] = 2.9 [1.2, 7.2]). In addition, those who had better household income were more likely to have examined their family members for leprosy compared to low-income families (AOR [95% CI] = 4.5 [1.6, 12.9]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>General knowledge about leprosy was low in communities. However, persons infected with leprosy who resided in the urban areas had a better understanding of leprosy. Male persons infected with leprosy were more likely to utilise leprosy services.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>The results of this study provide early insights into the factors associated with leprosy service utilisation to provide community-centred leprosy care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"39 1","pages":"664"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v39i1.664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A lack of awareness, poor quality of care, and gender inequalities are factors associated with access and utilisation of leprosy services.

Objectives: This study aimed to identify factors affecting community access and utilisation of leprosy services in high-burden districts of Ethiopia.

Method: A community-based cross-sectional study design was utilised and a simple random sampling technique was used to recruit study respondents. One hundred and sixty-one respondents completed the self-administered structured questionnaire. Data were analysed using SPSS version 26. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors associated with leprosy services. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: More than 75% (n = 123) of study respondents had limited knowledge about leprosy. However, respondents who reside in urban areas were knowledgeable about the disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 8.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6, 42.0). Men were most likely to use health care facilities (AOR [95% CI] = 2.9 [1.2, 7.2]). In addition, those who had better household income were more likely to have examined their family members for leprosy compared to low-income families (AOR [95% CI] = 4.5 [1.6, 12.9]).

Conclusion: General knowledge about leprosy was low in communities. However, persons infected with leprosy who resided in the urban areas had a better understanding of leprosy. Male persons infected with leprosy were more likely to utilise leprosy services.

Contribution: The results of this study provide early insights into the factors associated with leprosy service utilisation to provide community-centred leprosy care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚高负担地区获得和利用麻风病保健服务的情况。
背景:缺乏认识、护理质量差和性别不平等是与获得和利用麻风病服务相关的因素。目的:本研究旨在确定影响埃塞俄比亚高负担地区社区获得和利用麻风病服务的因素。方法:采用基于社区的横断面研究设计,采用简单的随机抽样技术招募研究对象。161名受访者完成了自我管理的结构化问卷。数据采用SPSS 26进行分析。使用逻辑回归模型确定与麻风病服务相关的预测因子。p值< 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:超过75% (n = 123)的调查对象对麻风病了解有限。然而,居住在城市地区的受访者对该疾病有所了解(调整优势比[AOR] = 8.2;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.6, 42.0)。男性最有可能使用卫生保健设施(AOR [95% CI] = 2.9[1.2, 7.2])。此外,与低收入家庭相比,家庭收入较好的家庭更有可能对其家庭成员进行麻风病检查(AOR [95% CI] = 4.5[1.6, 12.9])。结论:社区对麻风病的了解程度较低。然而,居住在城市地区的麻风病感染者对麻风病有更好的了解。感染麻风病的男性更有可能利用麻风病服务。贡献:本研究的结果提供了与麻风服务利用相关因素的早期见解,以提供以社区为中心的麻风护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊最新文献
Access and utilisation of leprosy healthcare services in high-burden districts in Ethiopia. Enhanced pathogen identification among patients with clinically suspected meningitis. Improving peritoneal dialysis fluid culture-positivity yield from 2022 to 2023. Brain abscesses in an immunocompromised patient with a soft tissue mass. Sexually transmitted pathogens in asymptomatic women at Rethabile clinic, Limpopo, South Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1