{"title":"Demand side financing for promoting institutional delivery: experiences of Janani Suraksha Yojana in Indian states.","authors":"J Krishna Nair, Pulak Mishra","doi":"10.1007/s10754-025-09391-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public expenditure for the improvement of maternal health is crucial in addressing the major social and demographic challenges in developing countries like India. Accordingly, the Government of India initiated the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in 2005 as a flagship conditional cash transfer scheme to encourage institutional delivery in the country. While the provisions under the JSY remain uniform throughout the country, there are apprehensions that the impact would differ across the states as well as between the rural and urban setups depending on varied socio-economic conditions and local level dynamics. Besides, households' choice of the type of institution (i.e., government versus private healthcare centres) may also change following the implementation of the JSY. This paper examines these two critical but interrelated aspects. Using secondary data compiled mainly from the last two rounds of the National Family Health Survey and estimating panel data econometric models, the paper finds that interactions with health facilitators during pregnancy, and per capita income contribute positively to the increase in institutional delivery in India irrespective of whether the households are located in rural or urban areas. Importantly, the paper does not find any significant role of the JSY in this regard. On the contrary, the JSY encourages households to prefer public to private hospitals in both rural and urban areas, whereas preference for private hospitals is positively associated with the household head literacy rate in urban area and health insurance coverage and per capita income in rural areas. The findings suggest greater emphasis on quality enhancement of the government healthcare centres. Besides, active engagement of the health workers should also be encouraged, particularly in mobilising the community towards institutional delivery and linking them effectively with the related initiatives of the government.</p>","PeriodicalId":44403,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10754-025-09391-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Public expenditure for the improvement of maternal health is crucial in addressing the major social and demographic challenges in developing countries like India. Accordingly, the Government of India initiated the Janani Suraksha Yojana (JSY) in 2005 as a flagship conditional cash transfer scheme to encourage institutional delivery in the country. While the provisions under the JSY remain uniform throughout the country, there are apprehensions that the impact would differ across the states as well as between the rural and urban setups depending on varied socio-economic conditions and local level dynamics. Besides, households' choice of the type of institution (i.e., government versus private healthcare centres) may also change following the implementation of the JSY. This paper examines these two critical but interrelated aspects. Using secondary data compiled mainly from the last two rounds of the National Family Health Survey and estimating panel data econometric models, the paper finds that interactions with health facilitators during pregnancy, and per capita income contribute positively to the increase in institutional delivery in India irrespective of whether the households are located in rural or urban areas. Importantly, the paper does not find any significant role of the JSY in this regard. On the contrary, the JSY encourages households to prefer public to private hospitals in both rural and urban areas, whereas preference for private hospitals is positively associated with the household head literacy rate in urban area and health insurance coverage and per capita income in rural areas. The findings suggest greater emphasis on quality enhancement of the government healthcare centres. Besides, active engagement of the health workers should also be encouraged, particularly in mobilising the community towards institutional delivery and linking them effectively with the related initiatives of the government.
期刊介绍：
The focus of the International Journal of Health Economics and Management is on health care systems and on the behavior of consumers, patients, and providers of such services. The links among management, public policy, payment, and performance are core topics of the relaunched journal. The demand for health care and its cost remain central concerns. Even as medical innovation allows providers to improve the lives of their patients, questions remain about how to efficiently deliver health care services, how to pay for it, and who should pay for it. These are central questions facing innovators, providers, and payers in the public and private sectors. One key to answering these questions is to understand how people choose among alternative arrangements, either in markets or through the political process. The choices made by healthcare managers concerning the organization and production of that care are also crucial. There is an important connection between the management of a health care system and its economic performance. The primary audience for this journal will be health economists and researchers in health management, along with the larger group of health services researchers. In addition, research and policy analysis reported in the journal should be of interest to health care providers, managers and policymakers, who need to know about the pressures facing insurers and governments, with consequences for regulation and mandates. The editors of the journal encourage submissions that analyze the behavior and interaction of the actors in health care, viz. consumers, providers, insurers, and governments. Preference will be given to contributions that combine theoretical with empirical work, evaluate conflicting findings, present new information, or compare experiences between countries and jurisdictions. In addition to conventional research articles, the journal will include specific subsections for shorter concise research findings and cont ributions to management and policy that provide important descriptive data or arguments about what policies follow from research findings. The composition of the editorial board is designed to cover the range of interest among economics and management researchers.Officially cited as: Int J Health Econ ManagFrom 2001 to 2014 the journal was published as International Journal of Health Care Finance and Economics. (Articles published in Vol. 1-14 officially cited as: Int J Health Care Finance Econ)
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
