Recognising vicarious trauma in research: the experiences of researchers who work with victimisation data and the support they need.

IF 1 Q3 NURSING Nurse Researcher Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.7748/nr.2025.e1952
Shannon Dhollande, Diksha Sapkota, Silke Meyer
{"title":"Recognising vicarious trauma in research: the experiences of researchers who work with victimisation data and the support they need.","authors":"Shannon Dhollande, Diksha Sapkota, Silke Meyer","doi":"10.7748/nr.2025.e1952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vicarious trauma people who provide direct clinical care may experience is well documented. However, there is limited information about the vicarious trauma that researchers working with victim-survivors of domestic and family violence (DFV) or victimisation-related data may experience.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe and reflect on the vicarious trauma experienced by people researching DFV who have repeatedly been exposed to significant, traumatic data.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Reflections were sourced from three researchers who were studying DFV victim-survivors' stories of trauma. Their work often left them feeling distressed and helpless. Crucial self-care strategies included taking regular breaks and debriefing co-researchers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential to monitor, prepare for and provide appropriate supervision and trauma-informed support to manage and address the vicarious trauma that researchers who work with sensitive and distressing data and vulnerable populations commonly experience.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Researchers need to consider during the conceptual phases of their studies possible risks to their psychological safety. Furthermore, research institutions have a responsibility to support researchers' mental well-being and promote safe research practices. Ethics committees may need to ensure prior to granting ethical approval that researchers have developed and implement strategies to prevent psychological harm to themselves.</p>","PeriodicalId":47412,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Researcher","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2025.e1952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The vicarious trauma people who provide direct clinical care may experience is well documented. However, there is limited information about the vicarious trauma that researchers working with victim-survivors of domestic and family violence (DFV) or victimisation-related data may experience.

Aim: To describe and reflect on the vicarious trauma experienced by people researching DFV who have repeatedly been exposed to significant, traumatic data.

Discussion: Reflections were sourced from three researchers who were studying DFV victim-survivors' stories of trauma. Their work often left them feeling distressed and helpless. Crucial self-care strategies included taking regular breaks and debriefing co-researchers.

Conclusion: It is essential to monitor, prepare for and provide appropriate supervision and trauma-informed support to manage and address the vicarious trauma that researchers who work with sensitive and distressing data and vulnerable populations commonly experience.

Implications for practice: Researchers need to consider during the conceptual phases of their studies possible risks to their psychological safety. Furthermore, research institutions have a responsibility to support researchers' mental well-being and promote safe research practices. Ethics committees may need to ensure prior to granting ethical approval that researchers have developed and implement strategies to prevent psychological harm to themselves.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识到研究中的间接创伤:处理受害数据的研究人员的经验和他们需要的支持。
背景:提供直接临床护理的人可能会经历的间接创伤是有据可查的。然而,研究家庭暴力的受害者-幸存者(DFV)或与受害者相关的数据的研究人员可能经历的替代性创伤的信息有限。目的:描述和反思研究DFV的人所经历的替代创伤,他们反复接触到重要的创伤数据。讨论:反思来自三位研究DFV受害者-幸存者创伤故事的研究人员。他们的工作常常使他们感到痛苦和无助。重要的自我照顾策略包括定期休息和向共同研究人员汇报情况。结论:监测、准备和提供适当的监督和创伤知情支持是至关重要的,以管理和解决研究人员与敏感和痛苦的数据和弱势群体共同经历的间接创伤。对实践的启示:研究人员需要在研究的概念阶段考虑对他们的心理安全可能存在的风险。此外,研究机构有责任支持研究人员的心理健康,促进安全的研究实践。伦理委员会可能需要确保在给予伦理批准之前,研究人员已经制定并实施了防止对自己造成心理伤害的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Researcher
Nurse Researcher NURSING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Additionally, the website provides a range of Internet links to the latest research news, conference information, jobs and grants, and other resources. We hope that this site becomes an invaluable interactive resource for both novice and experienced researchers. If you have any comments or suggestions to improve the site, or details of additional websites that could be usefully added, please let us know. We very much welcome your ideas so that we can provide the kind of online resource that will best help you to develop your research.
期刊最新文献
Recognising vicarious trauma in research: the experiences of researchers who work with victimisation data and the support they need. Sex workers and their stories: using timelines as a creative method in research involving underserved populations. Exploring the application and significance of case study research in nursing. How nurse researchers can use stepped-wedge design and analysis. Building inclusive research cultures in nursing - getting ready for the Research Excellence Framework 2029.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1