Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters.

IF 3.5 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Public Understanding of Science Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1177/09636625241300646
Selina A Ruzi, Adrian A Smith, Nicole M Lee
{"title":"Communicating biodiversity research on YouTube: An experimental comparison of scientists and third-party presenters.","authors":"Selina A Ruzi, Adrian A Smith, Nicole M Lee","doi":"10.1177/09636625241300646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online videos are a popular medium for science communication. These videos can be presented from many perspectives, including scientists sharing their own work or a third-party presenting research findings. A mixed between- and within-subjects experiment (<i>n</i> = 620) was conducted in the United States to assess the impact of narrative perspective on the communication objectives of increasing knowledge, changing perceptions, and influencing behavior related to bee diversity. Results indicate that watching a video presented by a scientist was associated with higher levels of perceived competence and a higher likelihood to mention a person or persons when recalling the video. However, we did not find significant effects of narrative perspective on knowledge gain and behavioral intentions to help support bee diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48094,"journal":{"name":"Public Understanding of Science","volume":" ","pages":"9636625241300646"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Understanding of Science","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241300646","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online videos are a popular medium for science communication. These videos can be presented from many perspectives, including scientists sharing their own work or a third-party presenting research findings. A mixed between- and within-subjects experiment (n = 620) was conducted in the United States to assess the impact of narrative perspective on the communication objectives of increasing knowledge, changing perceptions, and influencing behavior related to bee diversity. Results indicate that watching a video presented by a scientist was associated with higher levels of perceived competence and a higher likelihood to mention a person or persons when recalling the video. However, we did not find significant effects of narrative perspective on knowledge gain and behavioral intentions to help support bee diversity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在YouTube上传播生物多样性研究:科学家和第三方主持人的实验比较。
网络视频是一种流行的科学传播媒介。这些视频可以从许多角度呈现,包括科学家分享他们自己的工作或第三方展示研究成果。在美国进行了一项受试者之间和受试者内部的混合实验(n = 620),以评估叙事视角对增加知识、改变观念和影响与蜜蜂多样性相关的行为的传播目标的影响。结果表明,观看由科学家展示的视频与更高水平的感知能力有关,并且在回忆视频时更有可能提到一个人或几个人。然而,我们没有发现叙事视角对知识获取和行为意图的显著影响,以帮助支持蜜蜂多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Public Understanding of Science is a fully peer reviewed international journal covering all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Public Understanding of Science is the only journal to cover all aspects of the inter-relationships between science (including technology and medicine) and the public. Topics Covered Include... ·surveys of public understanding and attitudes towards science and technology ·perceptions of science ·popular representations of science ·scientific and para-scientific belief systems ·science in schools
期刊最新文献
Advocacy - defending science or destroying it? Interviews with 47 climate scientists about their fundamental concerns. Narratives of hope and concern? Examining the impact of climate scientists' communication on credibility and engagement. Self-serving beliefs about science: Science justifies my weaknesses (but not other people's). Who is at risk of bias? Examining dispositional differences in motivated science reception. Does exposure necessarily lead to misbelief? A meta-analysis of susceptibility to health misinformation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1