Bayesian surprise intensifies pain in a novel visual-noxious association.

IF 2.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106064
Ryota Ishikawa, Genta Ono, Jun Izawa
{"title":"Bayesian surprise intensifies pain in a novel visual-noxious association.","authors":"Ryota Ishikawa, Genta Ono, Jun Izawa","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain perception is not solely determined by noxious stimuli, but also varies due to other factors, such as beliefs about pain and its uncertainty. A widely accepted theory posits that the brain integrates prediction of pain with noxious stimuli, to estimate pain intensity. This theory assumes that the estimated pain value is adjusted to minimize surprise, mathematically defined as errors between predictions and outcomes. However, it is still unclear whether the represented surprise directly influences pain perception or merely serves to update this estimate. In this study, we empirically examined this question using virtual reality. In the task, participants reported felt pain via VAS after their arm was stimulated by noxious heat and thrusted into by a virtual knife actively. To manipulate surprise level, the visual threat suddenly disappeared randomly, and noxious heat was presented in the on- or post-action phases. We observed that a transphysical surprising event, created by sudden disappearance of a visual threat cue combined with delayed noxious heat, amplified pain intensity. Subsequent model-based analysis using Bayesian theory revealed significant modulation of pain by the Bayesian surprise value. These results illustrated a real-time computational process for pain perception during a single task trial, suggesting that the brain anticipates pain using an efference copy of actions, integrates it with multimodal stimuli, and perceives it as a surprise.</p>","PeriodicalId":48455,"journal":{"name":"Cognition","volume":"257 ","pages":"106064"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pain perception is not solely determined by noxious stimuli, but also varies due to other factors, such as beliefs about pain and its uncertainty. A widely accepted theory posits that the brain integrates prediction of pain with noxious stimuli, to estimate pain intensity. This theory assumes that the estimated pain value is adjusted to minimize surprise, mathematically defined as errors between predictions and outcomes. However, it is still unclear whether the represented surprise directly influences pain perception or merely serves to update this estimate. In this study, we empirically examined this question using virtual reality. In the task, participants reported felt pain via VAS after their arm was stimulated by noxious heat and thrusted into by a virtual knife actively. To manipulate surprise level, the visual threat suddenly disappeared randomly, and noxious heat was presented in the on- or post-action phases. We observed that a transphysical surprising event, created by sudden disappearance of a visual threat cue combined with delayed noxious heat, amplified pain intensity. Subsequent model-based analysis using Bayesian theory revealed significant modulation of pain by the Bayesian surprise value. These results illustrated a real-time computational process for pain perception during a single task trial, suggesting that the brain anticipates pain using an efference copy of actions, integrates it with multimodal stimuli, and perceives it as a surprise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝叶斯惊讶在一种新的视觉有害联想中加剧了疼痛。
疼痛感知不仅仅是由有害的刺激决定的,还会因其他因素而变化,比如对疼痛的信念及其不确定性。一个被广泛接受的理论认为,大脑将对疼痛的预测与有害刺激结合起来,以估计疼痛的强度。该理论假设,估计的疼痛值被调整到最小的惊喜,数学上定义为预测和结果之间的误差。然而,目前尚不清楚所代表的惊讶是否直接影响疼痛感知或仅仅用于更新这一估计。在这项研究中,我们使用虚拟现实对这个问题进行了实证检验。在这项任务中,参与者报告说,当他们的手臂受到有毒热量的刺激,并被一把虚拟刀主动刺入后,他们通过VAS感到疼痛。为了操纵惊讶程度,视觉威胁随机突然消失,并在行动前或行动后阶段呈现有害热量。我们观察到,由视觉威胁提示的突然消失和延迟的有毒热量造成的超物理惊讶事件,放大了疼痛强度。随后使用贝叶斯理论的基于模型的分析揭示了贝叶斯惊喜值对疼痛的显著调节。这些结果说明了在单一任务试验中疼痛感知的实时计算过程,表明大脑使用动作的一个感知拷贝来预测疼痛,将其与多模态刺激相结合,并将其视为一个惊喜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition
Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
283
期刊介绍: Cognition is an international journal that publishes theoretical and experimental papers on the study of the mind. It covers a wide variety of subjects concerning all the different aspects of cognition, ranging from biological and experimental studies to formal analysis. Contributions from the fields of psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, computer science, mathematics, ethology and philosophy are welcome in this journal provided that they have some bearing on the functioning of the mind. In addition, the journal serves as a forum for discussion of social and political aspects of cognitive science.
期刊最新文献
Blocking of associative learning by explicit descriptions. London taxi drivers exploit neighbourhood boundaries for hierarchical route planning. Hidden size: Size representations in implicitly coded objects. Is an eye truly for an eye? Magnitude differences affect moral praise more than moral blame. People expect artificial moral advisors to be more utilitarian and distrust utilitarian moral advisors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1