The Long-Term Effect of Childhood Otitis Media on Speech-in-Noise Testing at Ages 9 and 13

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70077
Stefanie N. H. Reijers, Jantien L. Vroegop, Bernd Kremer, Marc P. van der Schroeff
{"title":"The Long-Term Effect of Childhood Otitis Media on Speech-in-Noise Testing at Ages 9 and 13","authors":"Stefanie N. H. Reijers,&nbsp;Jantien L. Vroegop,&nbsp;Bernd Kremer,&nbsp;Marc P. van der Schroeff","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the relationship between a history of otitis media (OM) in early childhood and speech reception thresholds (SRT) in later childhood, using the Dutch digits-in-noise (DIN) test at ages 9 and 13 years.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted within the Generation R study, a prospective birth cohort in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Children underwent pure-tone audiometry and DIN testing at ages 9 (2011–2015) and 13 (2016–2020) years. Regression analyses and a linear mixed model were used to examine associations between OM history and SRT in noise, accounting for repeated measurements within individuals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At baseline (age 9 years), 2063 children were included with a mean SRT of −5.6 (SD = 2.0). At follow-up (age 13 years), 3382 children were included with a mean SRT of −7.4 (SD = 1.4). A positive association was found between recurrent acute OM (RAOM) and DIN test outcomes, with an estimated coefficient of 0.55 (95% CI = 0.26, 0.84; <i>t</i>-value = 3.70). Socioeconomic status and multilingualism did not significantly predict DIN test performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A history of RAOM may potentially influence SRT outcomes in later childhood, with higher DIN scores observed in the RAOM group. While the effect sizes between the groups are small to moderate, these findings highlight the importance of considering the potential long-term effects of OM in both clinical practice and future research. Further studies are needed to better understand these relationships.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>2 (cohort study).</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the relationship between a history of otitis media (OM) in early childhood and speech reception thresholds (SRT) in later childhood, using the Dutch digits-in-noise (DIN) test at ages 9 and 13 years.

Methods

This study was conducted within the Generation R study, a prospective birth cohort in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Children underwent pure-tone audiometry and DIN testing at ages 9 (2011–2015) and 13 (2016–2020) years. Regression analyses and a linear mixed model were used to examine associations between OM history and SRT in noise, accounting for repeated measurements within individuals.

Results

At baseline (age 9 years), 2063 children were included with a mean SRT of −5.6 (SD = 2.0). At follow-up (age 13 years), 3382 children were included with a mean SRT of −7.4 (SD = 1.4). A positive association was found between recurrent acute OM (RAOM) and DIN test outcomes, with an estimated coefficient of 0.55 (95% CI = 0.26, 0.84; t-value = 3.70). Socioeconomic status and multilingualism did not significantly predict DIN test performance.

Conclusion

A history of RAOM may potentially influence SRT outcomes in later childhood, with higher DIN scores observed in the RAOM group. While the effect sizes between the groups are small to moderate, these findings highlight the importance of considering the potential long-term effects of OM in both clinical practice and future research. Further studies are needed to better understand these relationships.

Level of Evidence

2 (cohort study).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
9岁和13岁儿童中耳炎对噪音中言语测试的长期影响。
目的:探讨儿童早期中耳炎(OM)病史与儿童后期言语接受阈值(SRT)的关系,采用9岁和13岁的荷兰数字噪声(DIN)测试。方法:本研究是在R世代研究中进行的,这是荷兰鹿特丹的一个前瞻性出生队列。儿童在9岁(2011-2015年)和13岁(2016-2020年)时接受纯音听力测定和DIN测试。回归分析和线性混合模型用于检查噪声中OM史和SRT之间的关系,考虑到个体内的重复测量。结果:在基线(9岁)时,纳入2063名儿童,平均SRT为-5.6 (SD = 2.0)。在随访(13岁)时,纳入3382名儿童,平均SRT为-7.4 (SD = 1.4)。复发性急性OM (RAOM)与DIN测试结果呈正相关,估计系数为0.55 (95% CI = 0.26, 0.84;t值= 3.70)。社会经济地位和多语言能力对DIN测试成绩没有显著的预测作用。结论:RAOM病史可能会影响儿童后期的SRT结果,在RAOM组观察到更高的DIN评分。虽然两组之间的效应大小从小到中等,但这些发现强调了在临床实践和未来研究中考虑OM潜在长期影响的重要性。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解这些关系。证据水平:2(队列研究)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Century of Otorhinolaryngology at Yonsei University College of Medicine and Engagement With US Missionaries Respiratory-Swallow Coordination of Uncued Swallows in Dysphagic and Tracheotomized Patients A Novel Hybrid Solution for Hearing Impairments A Novel Effect of Allium tuncelianum Extract: Topical Application Improves Wound Healing in a Nasal Septal Perforation Rat Model No-Shows in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Otolaryngology Clinic: Predictors and Impact on Provider Productivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1