Respiratory-Swallow Coordination of Uncued Swallows in Dysphagic and Tracheotomized Patients

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-02-08 DOI:10.1002/lio2.70098
Martin Gerbert, Veronika Segler, Julia Adam, Arneborg Ernst, Benjamin Riebold, Philipp Mittmann, Rainer Seidl
{"title":"Respiratory-Swallow Coordination of Uncued Swallows in Dysphagic and Tracheotomized Patients","authors":"Martin Gerbert,&nbsp;Veronika Segler,&nbsp;Julia Adam,&nbsp;Arneborg Ernst,&nbsp;Benjamin Riebold,&nbsp;Philipp Mittmann,&nbsp;Rainer Seidl","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory-swallow coordination (RSC) in healthy, dysphagic, and subjects with blocked, unblocked or without tracheostomy cannula (TC) over 2 h with focus on unintended deglutition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a single center (cross-sectional) observational study, a total of 65 subjects were included. Swallowing processes were recorded using RehaIngest (Hasomed GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany), combining electromyography (EMG) and bioimpedance (BI) inputs. Group differences were calculated using non-parametric tests, the influences of age and gender were evaluated using regression analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Respiratory patterns from 3761 swallows were evaluated. Nineteen healthy and 46 dysphagic subjects, including 15 without TC, 15 with blocked TC and 16 with unblocked TC, were recorded. In the dysphagia cohort unblocked and without TC demonstrated increased post-deglutitive expiration (<i>p</i> = 0.012, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and a decrease in post-deglutitive inspiration (<i>p</i> = 0.028, <i>p</i> = 0.013) compared with healthy probands. In addition, a higher proportion of subjects demonstrating post-deglutitive expiration was recorded amongst probands with unblocked TC compared to blocked TC (<i>p</i> = 0.012). Neither age nor gender significantly impacted the aforementioned outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our novel cross-sectional study shows that the RSC adapts in a compensatory fashion in the acquired dysphagia cohort. The adaptation depends on the occurrence of dysphagia and the type of TC. If the TC cuff is blocked, patients likely have an inadequate adaptation of the RSC, mainly because of the absence of a transglottic air flow. These findings indicate that RSC and TC care should be closely incorporated into clinical routine to improve dysphagia therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>1</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lio2.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the respiratory-swallow coordination (RSC) in healthy, dysphagic, and subjects with blocked, unblocked or without tracheostomy cannula (TC) over 2 h with focus on unintended deglutition.

Methods

In a single center (cross-sectional) observational study, a total of 65 subjects were included. Swallowing processes were recorded using RehaIngest (Hasomed GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany), combining electromyography (EMG) and bioimpedance (BI) inputs. Group differences were calculated using non-parametric tests, the influences of age and gender were evaluated using regression analysis.

Results

Respiratory patterns from 3761 swallows were evaluated. Nineteen healthy and 46 dysphagic subjects, including 15 without TC, 15 with blocked TC and 16 with unblocked TC, were recorded. In the dysphagia cohort unblocked and without TC demonstrated increased post-deglutitive expiration (p = 0.012, p = 0.001) and a decrease in post-deglutitive inspiration (p = 0.028, p = 0.013) compared with healthy probands. In addition, a higher proportion of subjects demonstrating post-deglutitive expiration was recorded amongst probands with unblocked TC compared to blocked TC (p = 0.012). Neither age nor gender significantly impacted the aforementioned outcomes.

Conclusion

Our novel cross-sectional study shows that the RSC adapts in a compensatory fashion in the acquired dysphagia cohort. The adaptation depends on the occurrence of dysphagia and the type of TC. If the TC cuff is blocked, patients likely have an inadequate adaptation of the RSC, mainly because of the absence of a transglottic air flow. These findings indicate that RSC and TC care should be closely incorporated into clinical routine to improve dysphagia therapy.

Level of Evidence

1

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Century of Otorhinolaryngology at Yonsei University College of Medicine and Engagement With US Missionaries Respiratory-Swallow Coordination of Uncued Swallows in Dysphagic and Tracheotomized Patients A Novel Hybrid Solution for Hearing Impairments A Novel Effect of Allium tuncelianum Extract: Topical Application Improves Wound Healing in a Nasal Septal Perforation Rat Model No-Shows in a Tertiary Care Pediatric Otolaryngology Clinic: Predictors and Impact on Provider Productivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1