Joyce Weeland, Amaranta de Haan, Stephen Scott, Maria João Seabra-Santos, Carolyn Webster-Stratton, Sinéad McGilloway, Walter Matthys, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Margiad Elen Williams, Willy Tore Mørch, Ulf Axberg, Maartje Raaijmakers, Patty Leijten
{"title":"Exploring family profiles in explaining heterogeneity in parenting program engagement and effectiveness.","authors":"Joyce Weeland, Amaranta de Haan, Stephen Scott, Maria João Seabra-Santos, Carolyn Webster-Stratton, Sinéad McGilloway, Walter Matthys, Maria Filomena Gaspar, Margiad Elen Williams, Willy Tore Mørch, Ulf Axberg, Maartje Raaijmakers, Patty Leijten","doi":"10.1037/fam0001275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parenting programs have proven effective in reducing disruptive child behavior. However, not all families benefit equally, and, to date, we have little insight into who benefits more or less and why. One possible solution is to explore how different potential moderators cluster together in individual families and whether such family profiles predict who benefits more or less from these programs. This study explores (a) how family, child, and parenting risk factors for disruptive behavior cluster together in families enrolled in the popular and evidence-based Incredible Years Parenting Program using latent profile analyses; (b) how family profiles relate to covariate family characteristics; and (c) whether profiles predict program engagement (i.e., number of sessions attended by caregivers) and effectiveness of (i.e., pre-post changes in disruptive behavior). Individual participant data from six studies across four countries (Norway, the Netherlands, England, Portugal) were used, including a total sample of 772 families with children aged 2.5-9 years (<i>M</i> = 5.14; <i>SD</i> = 1.10; 58.0% boys). Families could be profiled into a low- and high-risk profile, which differed on most child and family (but not parenting) risk factors as well as on covariate family characteristics, such as severity of disruptive behavior. Profile membership predicted engagement in, but not effectiveness of, the program. These findings provide useful insights into the heterogeneity in families participating in parenting programs, although there is a need for further research on how such differences may relate to differences in program effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"121-136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001275","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Parenting programs have proven effective in reducing disruptive child behavior. However, not all families benefit equally, and, to date, we have little insight into who benefits more or less and why. One possible solution is to explore how different potential moderators cluster together in individual families and whether such family profiles predict who benefits more or less from these programs. This study explores (a) how family, child, and parenting risk factors for disruptive behavior cluster together in families enrolled in the popular and evidence-based Incredible Years Parenting Program using latent profile analyses; (b) how family profiles relate to covariate family characteristics; and (c) whether profiles predict program engagement (i.e., number of sessions attended by caregivers) and effectiveness of (i.e., pre-post changes in disruptive behavior). Individual participant data from six studies across four countries (Norway, the Netherlands, England, Portugal) were used, including a total sample of 772 families with children aged 2.5-9 years (M = 5.14; SD = 1.10; 58.0% boys). Families could be profiled into a low- and high-risk profile, which differed on most child and family (but not parenting) risk factors as well as on covariate family characteristics, such as severity of disruptive behavior. Profile membership predicted engagement in, but not effectiveness of, the program. These findings provide useful insights into the heterogeneity in families participating in parenting programs, although there is a need for further research on how such differences may relate to differences in program effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.